Are Health care Providers Still Smoking? Data From the 2003 and 2006/2007 Tobacco Use Supplement-Current Population Surveys

School of Nursing, University of California, 700 Tiverton Ave, Box 956918, Los Angeles, CA 90095-6918, USA.
Nicotine & Tobacco Research (Impact Factor: 3.3). 10/2010; 12(11):1167-71. DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntq161
Source: PubMed


Smoking by health care professionals poses a barrier to interventions with patients. This study reports smoking status changes among health care professionals using the Tobacco Use Supplement-Current Population Surveys (TUS-CPS).
TUS-CPS self-reported smoking status (current, former, and never) identified by occupation (physicians, physician assistants, registered nurses [RNs], licensed practical nurses [LPNs], respiratory therapists, dentists, and dental hygienists), were analyzed for the 2003 (N = 4,095) and 2006/2007 (N = 3,976) cohorts. Quit ratios among U.S. health care professionals were calculated by dividing the number of former smokers by the number of ever-smokers using weighted estimates.
In 2006/2007, LPNs (20.55%) and respiratory therapists (19.28%) had the highest smoking prevalence. Physicians (2.31%), dentists (3.01%), pharmacists (3.25%), and RNs (10.73%) had the lowest prevalence. Data from 2006/2007 indicate that physicians, pharmacists, dentists, and physician assistants had the highest quit ratios; all groups had quit ratios higher than the general public, except LPNs (.52 vs. .46, respectively). Current smoking varied by group but did not significantly decline from 2003 to 2006/2007. The majority of health care professionals were never-smokers.
These data indicate that only 4 health care professional groups met the Healthy People 2010 goal of 12% smoking prevalence. LPNs were the only group with quit ratios lower than the general population. The lack of significant decline in smoking rates among health professionals was similar to the "flat" rate seen among adults in the United States. This is of concern as smoking among health care professionals limits their interventions with smokers and their involvement in tobacco control.

21 Reads
    • "Health professionals, especially family physicians (FPs), are the major part of providing for smoking cessation practice (SCP) [3]. However, frequency of smoking health care providers is not rare, and cigarette smoking by health care professionals, particularly FPs, in health care practice undermines their roles [4]. It is essential that clinicians consistently identify and document status of tobacco use and treat every tobacco user encountered in a health care setting not only the ones already suffering from tobacco-related diseases [5]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objective: Family physicians (FPs) are cornerstone for tobacco control. It was aimed to compare the effect of training on their smoking cessation practice, knowledge level and attitudes towards smoking and tobacco control. Methods and materials: The cross-sectional and multi-centered study was carried out using structured survey modified WHO based questionnaire. It was delivered to 1500 FPs randomly selected among approximately 23000 family physicians across the country. The study survey was self-reported by FPs, assessing their knowledge, attitudes, status of post-graduate training, and practice about tobacco control. Participants were assigned into two groups as non-trainee groups (Group 1) and post-graduate trainee (Group 2). Results: The mean age was 38.4 ± 7.1 years-old. The percentage of male and female FPs in the study was 53.1% and 46.9%. The ratio of family physicians who participated in training program Group 2) was 26.5% (n = 327). The ratio of female FPs who participated the SCP training course was significantly higher than that of male FPs (27.3% versus 22.5%, p = 0.035). There was no significant difference for smoking status between groups (p = 0.686). When the number FPs whose consulted by the smokers over ≥ 5 a week was compared, the ratio of FPs was significantly higher in group 2 than group 1 (p < 0.001), but overall ratio of FPs (2.8%) who consulted within a week smokers was considerably lower Statements of Competence and confidence items stated by all FPs were 24.2% and 32.2%, respectively. Physicians who had attended post-graduate training on SCP were more competent and confident, compared to non-trained FPs (p = 0.002 and p = 0.001). Conclusion: Post-graduate training on tobacco control improved self-confidence and competence of FPs. With post-graduate training, significant improvement was seen in practical skills of physicians. A continuing training program should be introduced to FPs, to engage them for smoking cessation practice.
    International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine 09/2014; 7(9):2763-70. · 1.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "), the prevalence of smoking among nursing students was higher than proportions reported in a 1990 study of Australian medical students: Year 1, 11.8% and Year 5, 13.7% (Richmond & Kehoe, 1997). This observation parallels the finding that, among healthcare professional, nurses continue to be the group with the highest smoking rates (Percival, Bialous, Chan, & Sarna, 2003). As reported in most previous studies of nursing students (Lenz, 2008), the great majority of daily smokers among nursing subjects (88%) reported they smoked daily before initiating their studies. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study identified major challenges to be addressed before student nurses can achieve their full potential in providing effective and comprehensive smoking cessation interventions. Smoking behaviors were assessed among undergraduate nursing students. In addition, students' attitudes, confidence levels, and support for extra training in tobacco control were examined. A nonprobability sample of 381 students at an Australian university was surveyed. The consent rate was 81%. Prevalence of current smoking was 21%. In the regression analysis, age group was the only statistically significant predictor of smoking status. Over one third (36%) did not endorse the nonsmoking exemplar role of their future profession. Most (60%) did not support the concept of routine smoking cessation intervention. Students who were smokers had significantly higher tobacco control confidence levels than nonsmokers. Smoking-related variables did not differ between students in different years of the course. Improved tobacco control training is needed at undergraduate level.
    Journal of Addictions Nursing 10/2012; 23(3):181-190. DOI:10.1097/JAN.0b013e31826f4b83 · 0.45 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In the TUS-CPS sample of female smokers, the proportions of nurses and women making a quit attempt in the previous 12 months (43% and 42%, respectively) are slightly lower than the one reported for the general population, i.e., 45% [28]. The lack of difference in recent quit efforts also was surprising given the changes in social acceptability of smoking, especially among healthcare professionals [29]. This is substantially lower than the quit attempt rates of a motivated sample of nurse smokers (92% female) participating in web-based smoking cessation intervention where 73% had made a quit attempt in the previous 12 months [19]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Smoking is a significant women's health issue. Examining smoking behaviors among occupational groups with a high prevalence of women may reveal the culture of smoking behavior and quit efforts of female smokers. The purpose of this study was to examine how smoking and quitting characteristics (i.e., ever and recent quit attempts) among females in the occupation of nursing are similar or different to those of women in the general population. Cross-sectional data from the Tobacco Use Supplement of the Current Population Survey 2006/2007 were used to compare smoking behaviors of nurses (n = 2, 566) to those of non-healthcare professional women (n = 93, 717). Smoking characteristics included years of smoking, number of cigarettes, and time to first cigarette with smoking within the first 30 minutes as an indicator of nicotine dependence. Logistic regression models using replicate weights were used to determine correlates of ever and previous 12 months quit attempts. Nurses had a lower smoking prevalence than other women (12.1% vs 16.6%, p < 0.0001); were more likely to have ever made a quit attempt (77% vs 68%, p = 0.0002); but not in the previous 12 months (42% vs 43%, p = 0.77). Among those who ever made a quit attempt, nurses who smoked within 30 minutes of waking, were more likely to have made a quit attempt compared to other women (OR = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.9, 5.1). When considering quit attempts within the last 12 months, nurses whose first cigarette was after 30 minutes of waking were less likely to have made a quit attempt compared to other females (OR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.49, 0.98). There were no other significant differences in ever/recent quitting. Smoking prevalence among female nurses was lower than among women who were not in healthcare occupations, as expected. The lack of difference in recent quit efforts among female nurses as compared to other female smokers has not been previously reported. The link between lower level of nicotine dependence, as reflected by the longer time to first cigarette, and lower quit attempts among nurses needs further exploration.
    BMC Women's Health 03/2012; 12(1):4. DOI:10.1186/1472-6874-12-4 · 1.50 Impact Factor
Show more

Karabi Nandy