Article

Applications of the molecular dynamics flexible fitting method

Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Journal of Structural Biology (Impact Factor: 3.23). 10/2010; 173(3):420-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.09.024
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In recent years, cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) has established itself as a key method in structural biology, permitting the structural characterization of large biomolecular complexes in various functional states. The data obtained through single-particle cryo-EM has recently seen a leap in resolution thanks to landmark advances in experimental and computational techniques, resulting in sub-nanometer resolution structures being obtained routinely. The remaining gap between these data and revealing the mechanisms of molecular function can be closed through hybrid modeling tools that incorporate known atomic structures into the cryo-EM data. One such tool, molecular dynamics flexible fitting (MDFF), uses molecular dynamics simulations to combine structures from X-ray crystallography with cryo-EM density maps to derive atomic models of large biomolecular complexes. The structures furnished by MDFF can be used subsequently in computational investigations aimed at revealing the dynamics of the complexes under study. In the present work, recent applications of MDFF are presented, including the interpretation of cryo-EM data of the ribosome at different stages of translation and the structure of a membrane-curvature-inducing photosynthetic complex.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Eduard Schreiner, Aug 25, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
164 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Singles-based positron volume imaging (PVI) transmission scans can provide measured 3D attenuation correction factors (ACFs) while requiring relatively short scan times (4-5 minutes). The main concern associated with singles-based transmission measurements is bias in the ACFs caused by scattered events in the transmission data. The magnitude and spatial characteristics of this scatter were investigated through computer simulation. Objects simulated include right circular cylinders of varying diameters, a 32 cm by 24 cm right elliptical cylinder, and the voxel.man digital phantom. Results indicated that scatter is very object dependent. For all objects simulated single scatter events comprised at least 70% of the total detected scatter. Furthermore, the shape of the scatter distribution was primarily determined by the single scatter events. Because the scatter distribution is very object dependent it is unlikely that simple correction techniques (e.g. fitting scatter tails or convolution subtraction) will prove effective. On the other hand because most of the detected scatter are single scatters, analytical methods which can accurately model single scatter events should provide the basis for an accurate scatter correction
    Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record, 1995., 1995 IEEE; 11/1995
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the Rhodobacter (Rba.) species of photosynthetic purple bacteria, a single transmembrane α-helix, PufX, is found within the core complex, an essential photosynthetic macromolecular assembly that performs the absorption and the initial processing of light energy. Despite its structural simplicity, many unresolved questions surround PufX, the most important of which is its location within the photosynthetic core complex. One proposed placement of PufX is at the center of a core complex dimer, where two PufX helices associate in the membrane and form a homodimer. Inability for PufX of certain Rba. species to form a homodimer is thought to lead to monomeric core complexes. In the present study, we employ a combination of computational and experimental techniques to test the hypothesized homodimerization of PufX. We carry out a systematic investigation to measure the dimerization affinity of PufX from four Rba. species, Rba. blasticus , Rba. capsulatus , Rba. sphaeroides , and Rba. veldkampii , using a molecular dynamics-based free-energy method, as well as experimental TOXCAT assays. We found that the four PufX helices have substantially different dimerization affinities. Both computational and experimental techniques demonstrate that species with dimeric core complexes have PufX that can potentially form a homodimer, whereas the one species with monomeric core complexes has a PufX with little to no dimerization propensity. Our analysis of the helix-helix interface revealed a number of positions that may be important for PufX dimerization and the formation of a hydrogen-bond network between these GxxxG-containing helices. Our results suggest that the different oligomerization states of core complexes in various Rba. species can be attributed, among other factors, to the different propensity of its PufX helix to homodimerize.
    Journal of the American Chemical Society 08/2011; 133(35):14071-81. DOI:10.1021/ja204869h · 11.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ribosome assembly in eukaryotes requires approximately 200 essential assembly factors (AFs) and occurs through ordered events that initiate in the nucleolus and culminate in the cytoplasm. Here, we present the electron cryo-microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of a late cytoplasmic 40S ribosome assembly intermediate from Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 18 angstrom resolution. We obtained cryo-EM reconstructions of preribosomal complexes lacking individual components to define the positions of all seven AFs bound to this intermediate. These late-binding AFs are positioned to prevent each step in the translation initiation pathway. Together, they obstruct the binding sites for initiation factors, prevent the opening of the messenger RNA channel, block 60S subunit joining, and disrupt the decoding site. These redundant mechanisms probably ensure that pre-40S particles do not enter the translation pathway, which would result in their rapid degradation.
    Science 08/2011; 333(6048):1449-53. DOI:10.1126/science.1208245 · 31.48 Impact Factor
Show more