Article

Association between orthodontic treatment need and caries experience.

Department of Orthodontics, University of Birmingham, UK.
Acta odontologica Scandinavica (Impact Factor: 1.41). 10/2010; 69(1):2-11. DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2010.516732
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate the association between orthodontic treatment need (OTN) and caries experience (CE).
Using a stratified sampling method, 748 subjects (355 females, 393 males; mean ± standard deviation age 15.11 ± 2.23 years) were examined. The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI), DMFT, simple (DMFT > 0) and severe CE (DMFT > 8) were recorded. Socio-economic status (SES) was assessed by recording parental education, mother's employment status, and household size.
Higher (but not statistically significant) CE was observed in subjects with OTN (DAI > 30). The association between DAI and DMFT scores was not significant (rho = 0.05). Mean DMFT score did not vary significantly between the SES and OTN subgroups. In children with a household size >6 persons (n = 85), OTN was associated with higher CE and a higher prevalence of severe CE compared with those without OTN. In this group, when DAI treatment need grade increased, severe CE prevalence also increased from 10.8% to 50%. Similarly, in those with OTN and household size >6 persons, the odds of observing subjects with severe CE was 4.6 times higher (95% confidence interval 1.45-14.55) compared to those without OTN.
Associations were observed between OTN and CE and also between the prevalence of severe CE and the severity of malocclusion in children with a household size >6 persons. The current findings suggest that the relationship between caries experience and malocclusion should be assessed in a wider context of SES and background factors.

1 Bookmark
 · 
324 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Malocclusion has great impact on society and the individual in terms of social and functional limitations, psychological trauma and discomfort. The Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) is a WHO recommended method of screening for dentofacial anomalies and orthodontic treatment need. This survey was conducted to determine the prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need among high school students in Mangalore city, Karnataka State, India. List of schools in Mangalore city was obtained from the Block Educational Officer. After obtaining consent from the relevant authorities, four schools were selected by random sampling (lottery method). In these schools, all students who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were examined with the help of a recorder. A proforma was used to record demographic data (name of the student and school, age, gender), and the criteria of the DAI for each subject. Data were analyzed using the Chi squared test and a p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Study subjects numbered 422 and ranged in age from 11-18 years. According to the DAI criteria, 66.1% subjects had no abnormality or minor malocclusion (requiring little or no orthodontic treatment), 22.3% had definite malocclusion (in whom orthodontic treatment was an elective option), 9.9% presented with severe malocclusion (with orthodontic treatment being highly desirable) and 1.7% had very severe or handicapping malocclusion (requiring mandatory orthodontic treatment). Malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need were found to be present in 33.9% of the population surveyed. These data will help in planning and executing appropriate measures to overcome this oral condition.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Malocclusion and dental caries are two of the most frequent dental and oral cavity conditions. Studies evaluating the relationship between malocclusion and tooth decay have reported conflicting results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between DMFS index and different types of malocclusion in a population of 11‒14-year-old Iranian children. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study 281 Iranian children aged 11‒14 (162 females, 119 males) were selected by multistage stratified sampling from elementary and guidance schools in Isfahan. DMFS index, overjet (mm), overbite (mm), anterior crowding (mm) and anterior spacing (mm) were measured. The results were analyzed by linear regression and Pearson’s correlation test at a significance level of 0.05. Results: DMFS index showed significant relationship with crowding (p value = 0.002, r = 0.183). Other types of malocclusion, including overjet, overbite and anterior tooth spacing did not exhibit significant relationships with DMFS (p value > 0.05). Conclusion: Under the limitations of this study, it was shown that of all types of malocclusion, there was a significant relationship between DMFS and crowding, with no such relationship between overjet, overbite and anterior tooth spacing.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe the distribution of malocclusion and its associated factors in Brazilian adolescents. Data from 7,328 subjects aged 12 years and 5,445 adolescents aged 15-19 years were analyzed. The adolescents took part in the Brazilian Oral Health Survey (SBBrasil 2010). The outcome was severe malocclusion according to the dental aesthetic index. The independent variables were sex, skin color, monthly household income, possessions, number of individuals in the household, untreated dental caries, missing teeth and dental appointments or lack thereof, frequency, and reason. Logistical regression analysis was carried out, considering the complex sampling cluster design, based on a hierarchical model. The prevalence of severe malocclusion was 6.5% and 9.1% in the 12-year-olds and the 15-19-year-olds, respectively. After adjustment, those with lighter- skinned black or black skin were 1.59 (95%CI 1.08;2.34) times more likely to present the outcome compared with those with white skin. The loss of one or more first molars increased 2.66 (95%CI 1.26;5.63) the chance to present severe malocclusion by the age of 12. Adolescents aged 15-19 whose household income was below R$ 1,500.00 (OR 2.69 [95%CI 1.62; 4.47]) and those who had seen a dentist for treatment (OR 2.59 [95%CI 2.55;4.34]) had the greatest chance of having severe malocclusion compared with those with higher incomes and those who visited the dentist for prevention.
    Revista de saude publica 12/2013; 47 Suppl 3:109-17. · 1.01 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
135 Downloads
Available from
May 23, 2014