Foreign Capital and Economic Growth

Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Impact Factor: 3.41). 02/2007; 75(2007-1). DOI: 10.1353/eca.2007.0016
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Nonindustrial countries that have relied more on foreign finance have not grown faster in the long run as standard theoretical models predict. The reason may lie in these countries’ limited ability to absorb foreign capital, especially because their financial systems have difficulty allocating it to productive uses, and because their currencies are prone to appreciation (and often overvaluation) when such inflows occur. The current anomaly of poor countries financing rich countries may not really hurt the former’s growth, at least conditional on their existing institutional and financial structures. Our results do not imply that foreign finance has no role in development or that all types of capital naturally flow “uphill.” Indeed, the patterns associated with foreign direct investment flows have generally been more consistent with theoretical predictions. However, we find no evidence that providing financing in excess of domestic saving is the channel through which financial integration delivers its benefits.


Available from: Eswar S. Prasad, Apr 19, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A nascent literature explores the measurement of financial fragility. This paper considers evidence for rising financial fragility during the 1984-2007 Great Moderation in the U.S. The literature suggests that macroeconomic stability combined with strong growth of credit to asset markets, in asset prices and in credit relative to output are all indicators of rising financial fragility. We show each of these trends in the Great Moderation. We derive the testable implication that in the Great Moderation credit growth is driven more by past credit growth and less by output growth (Allen and Gale, 2000), relative to pre-Great Moderation years. Results from a VAR model estimated on quarterly data for 1955-2007 are consistent with the hypothesis. This invites a reinterpretation of the Great Moderation. Our methodology may help understand when a credit boom turns into a credit bubble, and contributes to the development of methods of measuring financial fragility.
    Journal of Banking & Finance 12/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.09.005 · 1.29 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The paper studies the determinants of the relative unit labor cost (RULC) in the manufactures between Mexico and the US, and the effect of RULC on Mexican private investment. Seeking to detect persistent, "long-run" effects, the econometric estimations apply the bounds testing approach to quarterly data from the post-liberalization period in Mexico, 1988–2008. While the productivity-adjusted manufacturing real wage fell in Mexico, RULC nonetheless increased due to an even stronger fall in the US and the misalignment of the peso —with the latter resulting in a steady rise in Mexico's exchange-rate-adjusted relative manufacturing prices. The estimations show that RULC affects private investment negatively, and thus that the upward trend in RULC contributed to the low levels of investment observed in Mexico. In addition to capital flows, RULC responds significantly to the peso–dollar real interest rate differential, indicating that the upward trend in RULC is partly explained by repeated surges in capital inflows and the disinflationary stance of monetary policy. Looking ahead, the estimation results suggest that monetary policy can support faster economic growth, in the medium term, by reducing the interest rate differential and encouraging a more competitive level of RULC.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Promotion of foreign direct investment (FDI) has been a priority policy goal in Central America, Panama and Dominican Republic for the past twenty years. Fiscal benefits are among the policies that have been used to attract it. At first sight the model followed has been fruitful. In 2013 the eight countries of the region succeeded in attracting US$ 12.7 billion, the highest level of FDI in their history. But there are question marks about how FDI will perform in future and what the incentives to promote it should be now that World Trade Organization rules on the instruments used to promote FDI in the region have changed. The present book analyzes this situation in depth. Firstly, it reviews the importance of FDI in the region as a source of financing for the external deficit. Then it reviews the findings of international economic research on the impact of FDI on growth and the factors that attract it. It highlights that far from being assured, the benefits of FDI depend on complementary factors which are often not present in the region. Subsequently the book analyzes the international evolution of FDI and the growing importance of multinationals of Latin origin. It then tackles the controversial question of the efficacy of fiscal incentives as a means to attract investment, following an innovative technical approach based on firm level data which questions whether the free zones have had a net positive impact on development. This analysis is complemented by a study of investment promotion policies, which focuses particularly on the Investment Promotion Agencies. Finally, the book outlines the prospects for FDI attraction now the sun has set on strategies based on providing fiscal incentives. It argues that a new strategy should be based on the creation of new skills and capacities through instruments designed to complement productive development policies and thereby generate positive spillovers in the economy.
    02/2015; Inter-American Development Bank., ISBN: 978-1-59782-208-4