Article

Current status in the management of uterine corpus cancer in Korea.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (Impact Factor: 1.6). 09/2010; 21(3):151-62. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2010.21.3.151
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Uterine corpus cancer has increased in prevalence in Korean women over the last decade. Recently, elegant studies have been reported from many institutes. To improve treatment strategies, a review of our own data is warranted. This work will discuss the risks and prognostic factors for uterine corpus cancer, and the radiologic evaluation, prediction of lymph node metastasis, systematic lymphadenectomy, minimally invasive surgery, ovarian-saving surgery, fertility-sparing treatment, and adjuvant treatment in women with uterine cancer.

0 Followers
 · 
101 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: : To analyze pregnancy outcomes in young women with stage IA, grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus after successful fertility-sparing management using progestin. : We reviewed the medical records of 141 women with stage IA, grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus who had complete remission after progestin treatment. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables, using χ or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables, and using log-rank test for survival comparison. : Fifty-four (38.3%) women in the study cohort had a history of infertility. Seventy (49.6%) of the 141 patients tried to conceive with 44 (62.9%) receiving fertility drugs. The median interval to attempted pregnancy after treatment was 5 months (range 1-31 months). The median age at the time of the pregnancy trial was 32.4 years (range 23-40 years). Fifty-one (73%) of 70 women who tried to conceive were successful and 46 (66%) gave birth to 58 live neonates. The spontaneous abortion rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, and preterm delivery rates in our cohort were 24%, 2.8%, and 11.5%, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survival was similar between patients who received fertility drugs (n=44) or who did not (n=97) (73% compared with 62%, P=.335), and this rate was significantly higher in patients who achieved at least one pregnancy (n=51) than those who did not (n=90) (76% compared with 62%, P=.028). : Although the proportion of patients with a history of subfertility or infertility was high in our cohort, the pregnancy outcomes were very promising using assisted reproductive technology. The use of fertility drugs was not associated with a higher incidence of cancer recurrence after successful fertility-sparing management in this study population. : II.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 01/2013; 121(1):136-42. DOI:10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827a0643 · 4.37 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical staging and management through laparotomy has been the “gold standard” for treatment of endometrial cancer. However, recent advances in laparoscopic surgical techniques and instrumentation have meant that all surgical procedures for the treatment of endometrial cancer can now be performed using laparoscopy, which has naturally led to an increase in its use for treating this condition. Indeed, laparoscopic surgery is now the preferred alternative to laparotomy for the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Laparoscopic surgery is associated with improved outcomes, less complications, and improved quality of life, without compromising survival of patients. This review provides an update on the role of laparoscopic surgery for the surgical management of endometrial cancer with particular emphasis on feasibility, safety, and efficacy, based on the results of randomized, controlled trials comparing laparoscopy and laparotomy for surgical staging of endometrial cancer.
    03/2012; 2(1). DOI:10.1007/s13669-012-0031-6
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of second round of fertility-sparing management using progestin in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer after successful fertility-sparing management using progestin. METHODS: We reviewed 45 patients who had recurrence after achieving complete remission by fertility-sparing management using progestin for presumed stage IA, grade 1, endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus. Of 45 patients, 33 tried progestin re-treatment at recurrence and were included in this study. RESULTS: Recurrent disease was atypical hyperplasia in 13 patients (39%) and grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma in 20 patients (61%) which were confined to the endometrium. Thirty patients (91%) received medroxyprogesterone acetate (dose range, 80-500 mg/day) and three patients (9%) received megestrol acetate (dose range, 80-160 mg/day), with 29 patients receiving a dose of 500 mg/day of medroxyprogesterone acetate. The median duration of treatment was 6 months (range, 3-19 months). Five patients failed to respond to progestin re-treatment and underwent definitive surgical treatment including hysterectomy. Twenty eight patients (85%) showed complete response to progestin re-treatment. The median follow-up time after progestin re-treatment in 28 patients who achieved complete remission was 51 months (range, 24-160 months). During follow-up, five patients had second recurrence after median time interval of 14 months (range, 4-82 months). All patients who tried progestin re-treatment are alive without evidence of disease. CONCLUSION: Progestin re-treatment in patients with recurrent endometrial cancer was effective and safe. Therefore, this can be recommended for young women who still want to preserve fertility at recurrence after complete response to progestin.
    Gynecologic Oncology 12/2012; DOI:10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.12.037 · 3.69 Impact Factor

Preview

Download
23 Downloads
Available from