Comparison of in vitro cell models in predicting in vivo brain entry of drugs.

School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 1627, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland.
International journal of pharmaceutics (Impact Factor: 2.96). 10/2010; 402(1-2):27-36. DOI:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.09.016
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although several in vitro models have been reported to predict the ability of drug candidates to cross the blood-brain barrier, their real in vivo relevance has rarely been evaluated. The present study demonstrates the in vivo relevance of simple unidirectional permeability coefficient (P(app)) determined in three in vitro cell models (BBMEC, Caco-2 and MDCKII-MDR1) for nine model drugs (alprenolol, atenolol, metoprolol, pindolol, entacapone, tolcapone, baclofen, midazolam and ondansetron) by using dual probe microdialysis in the rat brain and blood as an in vivo measure. There was a clear correlation between the P(app) and the unbound brain/blood ratios determined by in vivo microdialysis (BBMEC r=0.99, Caco-2 r=0.91 and MDCKII-MDR1 r=0.85). Despite of the substantial differences in the absolute in vitro P(app) values and regardless of the method used (side-by-side vs. filter insert system), the capability of the in vitro models to rank order drugs was similar. By this approach, thus, the additional value offered by the true endothelial cell model (BBMEC) remains obscure. The present results also highlight the need of both in vitro as well as in vivo methods in characterization of blood-brain barrier passage of new drug candidates.

0 0
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The drug discovery process for drugs that target the central nervous system suffers from a very high rate of failure due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier, which limits the entry of xenobiotics into the brain. To minimise drug failure at different stages of the drug development process, new methodologies have been developed to understand the absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity (ADMET) profile of drug candidates at early stages of drug development. Additionally, understanding the permeation of drug candidates is also important, particularly for drugs that target the central nervous system. During the first stages of the drug discovery process, in vitro methods that allow for the determination of permeability using high-throughput screening methods are advantageous. For example, performing the parallel artificial membrane permeability assay followed by cell-based models with interesting hits is a useful technique for identifying potential drugs. In silico models also provide interesting information but must be confirmed by in vitro models. Finally, in vivo models, such as in situ brain perfusion, should be studied to reduce a large number of drug candidates to a few lead compounds. This article reviews the different methodologies used in the drug discovery and drug development processes to determine the permeation of drug candidates through the blood-brain barrier.
    Pharmaceutical Research 06/2013; · 4.74 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract 1. Currently available in vitro blood-brain barrier models all have recognized restrictions. In addition to leakiness, inconsistent data about P-glycoprotein mediated efflux limit the attractiveness of the primary bovine brain microvessel endothelial cells (BBMECs). Therefore, we re-evaluated the role of P-glycoprotein mediated efflux with two culture conditions in BBMECs for prediction of drug permeability of potential P-glycoprotein substrates. 2. BBMECs were monocultured on filters on petri dishes and on filter inserts, and expression and localization of P-glycoprotein were compared by using western blot and confocal microscopy, respectively. The functionality of P-glycoprotein was assessed by using cellular uptake, calcein-AM and bidirectional transport assays. 3. P-glycoprotein expression was higher in BBMECs cultured on filter inserts decreasing the permeability of digoxin and paclitaxel, but not the permeability of vinblastine. However, the monocultured BBMECs were not able to demonstrate efflux in the bidirectional transport assays. Under certain culture conditions, occludin may not be correctly located, perhaps explaining in part the leakiness of BBMECs. 4. In conclusion, BBMECs, despite possessing a functional P-glycoprotein, under certain culture conditions may not be a suitable in vitro model for the bidirectional transport assays and for predicting the permeability of drugs and xenobiotics that are potential P-glycoprotein substrates.
    Xenobiotica 08/2013; · 1.98 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relevant parameters for predicting rate and extent of access across the Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) are: fu,plasma (unbound fraction in plasma), Vu,brain (distribution volume in brain) and Kp,uu,brain (ratio of free concentrations in plasma and brain). Their estimation still requires animal studies and in vitro low throughput experiments which difficults the screening of new CNS candidates. The aim of the present work was to develop a new whole-in vitro high throughput method to predict drug rate and extent of access across the BBB. The system permits to estimate fu, plasma , Vu,brain and Kp,uu,brain in a single experimental system, using in vitro cell monolayers in different conditions. From the ratios of the apparent permeability values (Papp) with the adequate mathematical analysis the relevant parameters can be estimated. Papp of ten model compounds has been obtained in MDCKII and MDCK-Mdr1cell monolayers in absence and presence of albumin and brain homogenate. Ratio of Papp in absence and presence of albumin allows estimation of in vitro fu,plasma. Papp in the presence of brain homogenate is used to estimate fu,brain and Vu,brain. Kp,uu,brain is estimated from the apical to basal versus basal to apical clearances. The BBB parameters obtained with the new method were predictive of the in vivo behavior of candidates. In vitro fu,brain and Vu,brain. Kp,uu,brain calculated with Papp from MDCKII cell line presented a good correlation with in vivo published values (r=0.93; r=0.85 and r=0.99 respectively). Despite its simplicity the predictive performance is fairly good considering the reduced number of tested compounds with different physicochemical and transport properties. Further experimental modifications could be checked to optimize the method but the present data support its feasibility. As other in vitro cell culture models the system is suitable for miniaturization and robotization to allow high throughput screening of CNS candidates.
    Molecular Pharmaceutics 08/2013; · 4.57 Impact Factor