Article

Convergence across States and Regions

Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Impact Factor: 3.41). 01/1991; 22(1):107-182. DOI: 10.2307/2534639
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT [eng] Transportation costs and monopoly location in presence of regional disparities. . This article aims at analysing the impact of the level of transportation costs on the location choice of a monopolist. We consider two asymmetric regions. The heterogeneity of space lies in both regional incomes and population sizes: the first region is endowed with wide income spreads allocated among few consumers whereas the second one is highly populated however not as wealthy. Among the results, we show that a low transportation costs induces the firm to exploit size effects through locating in the most populated region. Moreover, a small transport cost decrease may induce a net welfare loss, thus allowing for regional development policies which do not rely on inter-regional transportation infrastructures. cost decrease may induce a net welfare loss, thus allowing for regional development policies which do not rely on inter-regional transportation infrastructures. [fre] Cet article d�veloppe une statique comparative de l'impact de diff�rents sc�narios d'investissement (projet d'infrastructure conduisant � une baisse mod�r�e ou � une forte baisse du co�t de transport inter-r�gional) sur le choix de localisation d'une entreprise en situation de monopole, au sein d'un espace int�gr� compos� de deux r�gions aux populations et revenus h�t�rog�nes. La premi�re r�gion, faiblement peupl�e, pr�sente de fortes disparit�s de revenus, tandis que la seconde, plus homog�ne en termes de revenu, repr�sente un march� potentiel plus �tendu. On montre que l'h�t�rog�n�it� des revenus constitue la force dominante du mod�le lorsque le sc�nario d'investissement privil�gi� par les politiques publiques conduit � des gains substantiels du point de vue du co�t de transport entre les deux r�gions. L'effet de richesse, lorsqu'il est associ� � une forte disparit� des revenus, n'incite pas l'entreprise � exploiter son pouvoir de march� au d�triment de la r�gion l

1 Bookmark
 · 
194 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: El libro ha sido pensado como un texto académico, pero a la vez también como algo cercano al público en general, gracias a su enfoque interdisciplinar en el que participan ocho académicos y que permite que algunos de los principios que forman parte del Buen Gobierno, sean abordados bajo una perspectiva iberoamericana del caso ecuatoriano. La obra se encuentra dividida en tres grandes partes: 1ᵃ) Ética Pública y Transparencia; 2ᵃ) Participación Ciudadana; y, 3ᵃ) Política y Gobiernos Locales. Dan un total de ocho capítulos, que se inician con un capítulo que viene a ser el estudio introductorio, a cargo del Catedrático de Ciencia Política y de la Administración de la Universidad de Alicante, Dr. José Manuel Canales Aliende, quien se detiene en explicar el paradigma de la Gobernanza y sus principales características, definiendo al Buen Gobierno, y detallando ochos principios: a) Transparencia y Apertura (“Open Government”); b) Receptividad; c) Integridad Ética; d) Vías de Participación en su interior de sus empleados, y de la ciudadanía en el exterior; e) Rendimiento de cuentas, y exigencia de responsabilidades; f) Eficacia, Eficiencia y Economía; g) Accesibilidad física y documental a sus instituciones; h) Legalidad y calidad de las leyes aprobadas; i) Respeto y garantía eficaz de los derechos humanos; j) Evaluación de los resultados de la gestión; y, k) Emprendimiento y ecología.
    Observatorio Lucentino de Administración y Políticas Públicas Comparadas edited by José Manuel Canales Aliende, Andrés Martínez Moscoso, 10/2014; University of Cuenca and University of Alicante., ISBN: 978-9978-14-277-6
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Social protection systems used in the European Union Member States display such general values as equality, justice, solidarity, and income redistribution. At the same time, diverse economic possibilities of the EU countries generate essential restrictions to taking account of these values. For example, Sweden spent on social protection over 30% of its GDP in 2006, Latvia and Estonia only 12% of GDP. Countries are exerting efforts to increase revenue in order to cover the constantly increasing costs of social protection. The issue of financing is the subject of political discussions both in the EU as a whole and in individual countries. Various schemes of financing are used in EU countries. Social protection expenditures are financed from various sources, the most important of which, in most of the countries, is social tax revenue. In EU-15 on average, 58.9% of the social protection expenditures were covered from social tax revenue receipts (contributions paid by employers and insured persons) and 38.0% from state contributions (public financing) in 2006. The share of social tax receipts in the financing schemes in new, EU-10 Member States is mostly higher than in EU-15 countries. The tendencies have been in different directions across countries. Our paper analyzes the financing schemes of social protection, how they have changed in EU countries over the period of 1991-2006, defining the trends that characterize these changes. We investigate whether or not the financing schemes are related to the social model used in that country, whether there has been convergence or divergence in social protection financing schemes between EU Member States. Convergence as a phenomenon we discuss on the basis of different theories and methods of evaluation. We use two principal methods of convergence evaluation for analyzing this problem.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Long-run income convergence is investigated in the U.S. context. We employ a novel pairwise econometric procedure based on a probabilistic definition of convergence. The time-series properties of all the possible regional income pairs are examined by means of unit root and non-cointegration tests, where inference is based on the fraction of rejections. We distinguish between the cases of strong convergence, where the implied cointegrating vector is [1, −1], and weak convergence, where long-run homogeneity is relaxed. To address cross-sectional dependence, we employ a bootstrap methodology to derive the empirical distribution of the fraction of rejections. We find supporting evidence of U.S. states sharing a common stochastic trend consistent with a definition of convergence based on long-run forecasts of state incomes being proportional rather than equal. We find that the strength of convergence between states decreases with distance and initial income disparity. Using Metropolitan Statistical Area data, evidence for convergence is stronger.
    Macroeconomic Dynamics 01/2014; 18:1635-1655. · 0.91 Impact Factor