Impact of delayed graft function on renal function and graft survival in deceased kidney transplantation

Renal Unit, Department of Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Hong Kong.
Hong Kong medical journal = Xianggang yi xue za zhi / Hong Kong Academy of Medicine (Impact Factor: 0.87). 10/2010; 16(5):378-82.
Source: PubMed


To define the risk factors for delayed graft function and study the impact of such delays on renal function and long-term allograft survival in renal transplant recipients.
Single-centre retrospective study.
Regional hospital, Hong Kong.
Records of 118 Chinese renal transplant recipients from 1 July 1997 to 31 July 2005 were reviewed, and categorised into delayed and immediate graft function groups.
Delayed graft function was observed in about 19% of patients, for which cold ischaemic time was an important independent predictor. For each additional hour of cold ischaemic time, the odds ratio increased for delayed function by 0.002 (95% confidence interval, 0.001-0.003; P=0.03). Multivariate analysis revealed that neither cold ischaemic time nor delayed graft function was associated with acute rejection. On the other hand, at 1 year both delayed graft function (odds ratio=18.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.6-130.5; P=0.003) and donor age (1.2; 1.1-1.3; P=0.003) were related to a glomerular filtration rate of less than 30 mL/min. When renal function between patients with and without delayed graft function during the first 3 years was compared, it was significantly better in those without delayed graft function. However, there was no significant difference in death-censored graft survival between delayed graft function and immediate graft function groups.
Delayed graft function has a significant adverse effect on graft function at 1 year. Limiting cold ischaemic time is important as it is an independent predictor of delayed graft function.

Download full-text


Available from: Chi Yuen Cheung,
72 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the immunosuppressant cyclosporine (CsA) is widely used after kidney transplantation over the long term, there is still no firm consensus on the best way to monitor of CsA blood levels. Cyclosporine (CsA) assay is critical for the management of renal transplant recipients due to inter- and intra-patient variation in CsA absorption and metabolism. In a retrospective cross sectional study, blood levels of CsA (through and 2 hours post dose) measured at least 5 times during 3 years post transplantation, in 7702 kidney transplant recipients from different transplant center of Tehran, IR Iran between 2008 and 2012. Cyclosporine absorption (CA) calculated C2/C0 ratio. CA had a significant correlation with allograft function (P = 0.000, r =.0.285), this correlation was stronger than its relationship with C0 and C2 blood levels (P = 0.000 and P = 0.000 as well as r = 0.033 and r = 0.090, respectively). In univariate analysis during different times after transplantation, C0 and C2 blood levels significantly decreased over three years follow up (P = 0.000), (P = 0.000); While, CA reversely increases over the time (P = 0.000). In linear regression model overall CA levels had correlation with lower age of recipient (P = 0.02), hypokalemia (P = 0.001), higher level of creatinine (P = 0.02) and triglyceride (P = 0.001). The present study shows that CsA absorption changes trough the post-transplant time and appears to increases over time in long-term period after kidney transplantation.
    03/2012; 4(2):470-4. DOI:10.5812/numonthly.2437
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Despite several studies conducted to detect predisposing factors of graft rejection, results are inconsistent and limited. This study was performed to estimate long-term survival rate of kidney transplantation and to detect associated prognostic factors. Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted in Hamadan Province, in western Iran, enrolling 475 patients who had undergone kidney transplantation from 1994 to 2011. Data were extracted from patients' medical records using a checklist. Chronic nonreversible graft rejection was considered as the event of interest. The duration of time between kidney transplantation and rejection was considered as the survival time. Life table, Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model were used for data analysis. Results: Out of 475 transplantations, 55 episodes of rejection occurred. One-, 5-, 10-, 15-, and 18-year survival rates of transplantation were 97.1%, 92.3%, 86.2%, 77.6%, and 60.3%, respectively. The hazard ratio of graft rejection per 1-year increase in recipient age was 0.92 (P=0.001). The hazard ratio of graft rejection was 5.47 for grafts from deceased donors compared to grafts from living donors (P=0.025), and 3.54 (P=0.025) and 47.99 (P=0.001) in patients with episode of acute and hyperacute rejection compared to those without rejection episode, respectively. Conclusions: Rejection of kidney transplantation is shaped by several prognostic factors, the most important of which are recipient age, type of donor (living vs. deceased), and episode of post-transplantation acute and hyperacute rejection.
    06/2013; 18(1):153-60. DOI:10.12659/AOT.883873
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Delayed graft function (DGF) is an early complication of kidney transplant (KT) and it is related to a higher incidence of acute rejection (AR) and lower graft survival. The incidence of DGF ranges from 2 to 29% in different series. Several risk factors for DGF have been described, including inotropic use in the deceased donor, long cold ischemia time, cardiovascular brain death, age > 55 years, hypovolemia, previous transplant, preformed antibodies and OKT3 use. This study is a retrospective cohort of the kidney transplant recipients (KTR) of deceased donors from 1990 to 2009, at the INCMNSZ. We analyzed the incidence of DGF, risk factors associated to its development, and patient and graft outcome. To compare the groups, we used chi2 test or Student's t test for categorical and numeric variables, respectively. Patient and graft survival were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method; a p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data from 105 KTR were analyzed. DGF occurred in 21%, AR in 27%, graft loss in 15.2%. The only risk factor associated to DGF was brain death due to vascular disease (p = 0.028). Brain death due to vascular disease was the only risk factor associated to DGF. A non-significant higher incidence of AR was observed in patients with DGF. Survival was significantly lower in patients who developed DGF compared to those without DGF, and it was not related to renal function.
    Revista de investigacion clinica; organo del Hospital de Enfermedades de la Nutricion 07/2013; 65(2):109-15. · 0.48 Impact Factor
Show more