Article

Increased ethanol productivity in xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae via a randomly mutagenized xylose reductase. Appl Environ Microbiol

Department of Applied Microbiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Applied and Environmental Microbiology (Impact Factor: 3.95). 10/2010; 76(23):7796-802. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01505-10
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) has been genetically engineered to ferment the pentose sugar xylose present in lignocellulose biomass. One of the reactions controlling the rate of xylose utilization is catalyzed by xylose reductase (XR). In particular, the cofactor specificity of XR is not optimized with respect to the downstream pathway, and the reaction rate is insufficient for high xylose utilization in S. cerevisiae. The current study describes a novel approach to improve XR for ethanol production in S. cerevisiae. The cofactor binding region of XR was mutated by error-prone PCR, and the resulting library was expressed in S. cerevisiae. The S. cerevisiae library expressing the mutant XR was selected in sequential anaerobic batch cultivation. At the end of the selection process, a strain (TMB 3420) harboring the XR mutations N272D and P275Q was enriched from the library. The V(max) of the mutated enzyme was increased by an order of magnitude compared to that of the native enzyme, and the NADH/NADPH utilization ratio was increased significantly. The ethanol productivity from xylose in TMB 3420 was increased ∼40 times compared to that of the parent strain (0.32 g/g [dry weight {DW}] × h versus 0.007 g/g [DW] × h), and the anaerobic growth rate was increased from ∼0 h(-1) to 0.08 h(-1). The improved traits of TMB 3420 were readily transferred to the parent strain by reverse engineering of the mutated XR gene. Since integrative vectors were employed in the construction of the library, transfer of the improved phenotype does not require multicopy expression from episomal plasmids.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Maurizio Bettiga, Aug 25, 2015
1 Follower
 · 
117 Views
  • Source
    • "S. cerevisiae TMB 3043 (Karhumaa et al. 2005) was transformed with the EcoRV-linearized vector YIpOB8 (Runquist et al. 2010), generating the strain TMB 4440. The yeast cells were transformed using the highefficiency Li-Ac method (Gietz and Schiestl 2007), and plated on YNB-xylose (20 g L "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Poly-3-D-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a promising biopolymer naturally produced by several bacterial species. In the present study, the robust baker’s yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae was engineered to produce PHB from xylose, the main pentose found in lignocellulosic biomass. The PHB pathway genes from the well-characterized PHB producer Cupriavidus necator were introduced in recombinant S. cerevisiae strains already capable of pentose utilization by introduction of the fungal genes for xylose utilization from the yeast Scheffersomyces stipitis. PHB production from xylose was successfully demonstrated in shake-flasks experiments, with PHB yield of 1.17 ± 0.18 mg PHB g−1 xylose. Under well-controlled fully aerobic conditions, a titer of 101.7 mg PHB L−1 was reached within 48 hours, with a PHB yield of 1.99 ± 0.15 mg PHB g−1 xylose, thereby demonstrating the potential of this host for PHB production from lignocellulose.
    02/2015; 5(14). DOI:10.1186/s13568-015-0100-0
  • Source
    • "Using YPK the xylose utilizing pathway was assembled in a multi-copy at once into S. cerevisiae CEN.PK 113-5D strain, using URA3 gene as a selection marker. The engineered pathway contains the SsXYL1 (N272D; mutated (Runquist et al., 2010)), SsXYL2, ScXKS1 and ScTAL1 genes, under different S. cerevisiae promoters TEF1, TDH3, PGI1 and FBA1, respectively. The obtained plasmid was named pMEC1035 (Pereira et al., submitted). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this work, Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains PE-2 and CAT-1, commonly used in the Brazilian fuel ethanol industry, were engineered for xylose fermentation, where the first fermented xylose faster than the latter, but also produced considerable amounts of xylitol. An engineered PE-2 strain (MEC1121) efficiently consumed xylose in presence of inhibitors both in synthetic and corn-cob hydrolysates. Interestingly, the S. cerevisiae MEC1121 consumed xylose and glucose simultaneously, while a CEN.PK based strain consumed glucose and xylose sequentially. Deletion of the aldose reductase GRE3 lowered xylitol production to undetectable levels and increased xylose consumption rate which led to higher final ethanol concentrations. Fermentation of corn-cob hydrolysate using this strain, MEC1133, resulted in an ethanol yield of 0.47g/g of total sugars which is 92% of the theoretical yield. Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
    Bioresource Technology 12/2014; 179C:150-158. DOI:10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.020 · 5.04 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "the gene of interest, or alternatively promoter regions or even whole genomes, is subjected to PCR amplification with an elevated error rate (by the lack of exonuclease activity and/or nonideal reaction conditions), followed by transformation of the fragments into the microorganism of interest and a screening to recover mutants that display phenotypic improvement. For instance, Runquist et al. (2010) applied epPCR to the cofactor-binding region of the Sc. stipitis gene XYL1, one of the enzymes needed for S. cerevisiae to consume xylose, and transformed this library into S. cerevisiae. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Yeasts have been used for thousands of years to make fermented foods and beverages, such as beer, wine, sake and bread. However, the choice for a particular yeast strain or species for a specific industrial application is often based on historical rather than scientific grounds. Moreover, new biotechnological yeast applications, such as the production of second-generation biofuels, confronts yeast with environments and challenges that differ from those encountered in traditional food fermentations. Together, this implies that there are interesting opportunities to isolate or generate variants that perform better than the currently used strains. Here, we discuss the different strategies of strain selection and improvement available for both conventional and non-conventional yeasts. Exploiting the existing natural diversity and using techniques such as mutagenesis, protoplast fusion, breeding, genome shuffling and directed evolution to generate artificial diversity, or the use of genetic modification strategies to alter traits in a more targeted way, have led to selection of superior industrial yeasts. Furthermore, recent technological advances allowed the development of high-throughput techniques, such as “global transcription machinery engineering” (gTME), to induce genetic variation, providing a new source of genetic yeast diversity.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    FEMS microbiology reviews 04/2014; 38(5). DOI:10.1111/1574-6976.12073 · 13.81 Impact Factor
Show more