Predictors of Perceived Benefit Among Patients Committed by Court Order in the Netherlands: One-Year Follow-Up

Department of Psychiatry, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Psychiatric services (Washington, D.C.) (Impact Factor: 2.41). 10/2010; 61(10):1024-7. DOI: 10.1176/
Source: PubMed


This study identified predictors of perceived benefit resulting from court-ordered hospitalization in the Netherlands.
This prospective study included 174 psychiatric inpatients committed under court order. Logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between predictor variables and perceived benefit.
At one year, 52% of patients evaluated their involuntary hospitalization as beneficial. These patients were more likely to be homeless (odds ratio [OR]=4.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.33-12.84), to have been previously hospitalized voluntarily (OR=2.30, CI=1.18-4.48), and to have high service engagement (OR=2.79, CI=1.19-6.53) or more illness insight (OR=2.78, 95% CI=1.13-6.89). Having a psychotic disorder or higher severity of symptoms at baseline was correlated with an improved perception of benefit.
Perceived benefits were predicted by living condition, hospitalization history, service engagement, and illness insight. Clinical characteristics were associated with improvement in perceived benefit. Additional research should focus on causality of associations before effective intervention programs can be developed.

Download full-text


Available from: Cornelis L Mulder, Sep 08, 2015
5 Reads
  • Psychiatric journal of the University of Ottawa: Revue de psychiatrie de l'Université d'Ottawa 10/1986; 11(3):162-5.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper reviews studies on outcomes of involuntary hospital admissions in general adult psychiatry, and predictors of outcomes. Studies assessing observer-rated clinical change and self-rated outcomes were identified. Relevant databases were searched and authors were contacted. Studies were classified according to quality criteria. Eighteen studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Most involuntarily admitted patients show substantial clinical improvement over time. Retrospectively, between 33% and 81% of patients regard the admission as justified and/or the treatment as beneficial. Data on predictors of outcomes is limited and inconsistent. Patients with more marked clinical improvement tend to have more positive retrospective judgements. A substantial number of involuntary patients do retrospectively not feel that their admission was justified and beneficial. At least for this group, new approaches might have to be considered. Larger studies are required to identify predictors on which patients are likely to fall into this group.
    Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 11/2006; 114(4):232-41. DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00823.x · 5.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thirty-five involuntarily hospitalized psychiatric patients were interviewed immediately following admission and again prior to discharge to assess attitudinal changes and their relationship to patient characteristics and treatment outcome. The results indicate significant changes toward recognition of the original need for involuntary treatment. Those patients achieving remission of symptoms were most likely to have positive attitudes. Follow-up data indicate that the majority continued to receive outpatient treatment after the index episode, and among those readmissions that occurred, 92% were voluntary.
    Archives of General Psychiatry 05/1983; 40(4):374-7. · 14.48 Impact Factor