Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial

Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, UK.
The Lancet (Impact Factor: 39.21). 10/2010; 376(9747):1147-54. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61389-X
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Cabazitaxel is a novel tubulin-binding taxane drug with antitumour activity in docetaxel-resistant cancers. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of cabazitaxel plus prednisone with those of mitoxantrone plus prednisone in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with progressive disease after docetaxel-based treatment.
We undertook an open-label randomised phase 3 trial in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who had received previous hormone therapy, but whose disease had progressed during or after treatment with a docetaxel-containing regimen. Participants were treated with 10 mg oral prednisone daily, and were randomly assigned to receive either 12 mg/m(2) mitoxantrone intravenously over 15-30 min or 25 mg/m(2) cabazitaxel intravenously over 1 h every 3 weeks. The random allocation schedule was computer-generated; patients and treating physicians were not masked to treatment allocation, but the study team was masked to the data analysis. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival and safety. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered at, NCT00417079.
755 men were allocated to treatment groups (377 mitoxantrone, 378 cabazitaxel) and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. At the cutoff for the final analysis (Sept 25, 2009), median survival was 15·1 months (95% CI 14·1-16·3) in the cabazitaxel group and 12·7 months (11·6-13·7) in the mitoxantrone group. The hazard ratio for death of men treated with cabazitaxel compared with those taking mitoxantrone was 0·70 (95% CI 0·59-0·83, p<0·0001). Median progression-free survival was 2·8 months (95% CI 2·4-3·0) in the cabazitaxel group and 1·4 months (1·4-1·7) in the mitoxantrone group (HR 0·74, 0·64-0·86, p<0·0001). The most common clinically significant grade 3 or higher adverse events were neutropenia (cabazitaxel, 303 [82%] patients vs mitoxantrone, 215 [58%]) and diarrhoea (23 [6%] vs one [<1%]). 28 (8%) patients in the cabazitaxel group and five (1%) in the mitoxantrone group had febrile neutropenia.
Treatment with cabazitaxel plus prednisone has important clinical antitumour activity, improving overall survival in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose disease has progressed during or after docetaxel-based therapy.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To improve the outcomes of patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), there is an urgent need for more effective therapies and approaches that individualize specific treatments for patients with CRPC. These studies compared the novel taxane cabazitaxel with the previous generation docetaxel, and aimed to determine which tumors are most likely to respond. Cabazitaxel and docetaxel were compared via in vitro modeling to determine the molecular mechanism, biochemical and cell biologic impact, and cell proliferation, which was further assessed ex vivo in human tumor explants. Isogenic pairs of RB knockdown and control cells were interrogated in vitro and in xenograft tumors for cabazitaxel response. The data herein show that (i) cabazitaxel exerts stronger cytostatic and cytotoxic response compared with docetaxel, especially in CRPC; (ii) cabazitaxel induces aberrant mitosis, leading to pyknotic and multinucleated cells; (iii) taxanes do not act through the androgen receptor (AR); (iv) gene-expression profiling reveals distinct molecular actions for cabazitaxel; and (v) tumors that have progressed to castration resistance via loss of RB show enhanced sensitivity to cabazitaxel. Cabazitaxel not only induces improved cytostatic and cytotoxic effects, but also affects distinct molecular pathways, compared with docetaxel, which could underlie its efficacy after docetaxel treatment has failed in patients with CRPC. Finally, RB is identified as the first potential biomarker that could define the therapeutic response to taxanes in metastatic CRPC. This would suggest that loss of RB function induces sensitization to taxanes, which could benefit up to 50% of CRPC cases. Clin Cancer Res; 21(4); 795-807. ©2015 AACR. ©2015 American Association for Cancer Research.
    Clinical Cancer Research 02/2015; 21(4):795-807. DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1358 · 8.19 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The rapid evolution of molecular technologies that can identify genetic markers and lead to dissecting the inherent variance of individual cancer biology has had a tangible impact on trial designs in oncology. Rational trial designs based on molecular marker expression coupled with drug-marker interactions have started to be adopted, challenging the previous paradigms of morphology-based, single-arm efficacy studies. This review summarizes novel trials being developed based on molecular predictive factor therapeutics and the potential impact these novel trial designs will have on the practice of oncology in future. A variety of clinical trial designs based on tumor and drug-host genetic interactions are discussed and the example of advanced prostate cancer is used to illustrate the changing landscape of clinical trial designs in cancer.
    Personalized Medicine 11/2013; 10(8):859-869. DOI:10.2217/pme.13.78 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Corticosteroids have been used in the management of prostate cancer for over 30 years. Although daily oral corticosteroids have frequently used in conjunction with chemotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, their independent impact on survival is unclear. However, corticosteroids confer palliative benefits and are associated with objective responses and circulating tumor cell (CTC) and PSA declines in a small minority of patients, although toxicities such as osteoporosis and immunosuppression complicate long-term use. Following the demonstration of a palliative benefit for mitoxantrone combined with corticosteroids compared with corticosteroids alone, subsequent trials that demonstrated a benefit for first-line docetaxel over mitoxantrone, and second-line cabazitaxel over mitoxantrone, administered concurrent daily oral corticosteroids with all of these agents to maintain uniformity. Conversely, improved outcomes were demonstrated with docetaxel without corticosteroids for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Daily oral corticosteroids are routinely combined with abiraterone to mitigate symptoms of mineralocorticoid excess. In contrast daily corticosteroids are not essential when administering enzalutamide or radium-223, and there is a concern of deleterious immune effects concurrently with sipuleucel-T. Given emerging evidence for promotion of resistance mechanisms, routine administration of daily oral corticosteroids in settings other than abiraterone administration and palliation of symptoms is probably not required.
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology 02/2015; 16(2):320. DOI:10.1007/s11864-014-0320-6 · 3.24 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 3, 2014