A Risk Prediction Model for Delayed Graft Function in the Current Era of Deceased Donor Renal Transplantation

Biostatistics and Health Outcomes Research, CTI Clinical Trial and Consulting Services, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
American Journal of Transplantation (Impact Factor: 6.19). 10/2010; 10(10):2279-86. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2010.03179.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Delayed graft function (DGF) impacts short- and long-term outcomes. We present a model for predicting DGF after renal transplantation. A multivariable logistic regression analysis of 24,337 deceased donor renal transplant recipients (2003-2006) was performed. We developed a nomogram, depicting relative contribution of risk factors, and a novel web-based calculator ( as an easily accessible tool for predicting DGF. Risk factors in the modern era were compared with their relative impact in an earlier era (1995-1998). Although the impact of many risk factors remained similar over time, weight of immunological factors attenuated, while impact of donor renal function increased by 2-fold. This may reflect advances in immunosuppression and increased utilization of kidneys from expanded criteria donors (ECDs) in the modern era. The most significant factors associated with DGF were cold ischemia time, donor creatinine, body mass index, donation after cardiac death and donor age. In addition to predicting DGF, the model predicted graft failure. A 25-50% probability of DGF was associated with a 50% increased risk of graft failure relative to a DGF risk < 25%, whereas a > 50% DGF risk was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of graft failure. This tool is useful for predicting DGF and long-term outcomes at the time of transplant.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Kidney transplantation is the best renal replacement therapy option and is superior to dialysis in elderly ESRD patients. Furthermore, the outcome of transplantation in the elderly is comparable to younger patients in terms of allograft survival. The exact nature of this phenomenon is not completely clear.As the elderly population continues to grow, it becomes more important to identify specific issues associated with kidney transplantation. In particular, elderly transplant recipients might have a lower chance of acute rejection since their immune systems seem to be less reactive. This might predispose elderly recipients to greater risk of post-transplant infectious complications or malignancies.Furthermore, due to differences in pharmacokinetics elderly recipients might require lower doses of immunosuppressive medication. As the main cause of graft failure in the elderly is death with a functioning graft, and also considering the scarcity of donor organs, it might make sense to recommend transplanting elderly recipients with extended criteria donor kidneys. This approach would balance shorter patient survival compared to younger recipients.In conclusion, old age should not preclude ESRD patients from kidney transplantation. However, specific differences that have to do with immunosuppression and other aspects of managing elderly transplant recipients should be considered.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Clinical Transplantation 11/2014; 29(2). DOI:10.1111/ctr.12481 · 1.49 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Identification of pre-transplant factors influencing delayed graft function (DGF) could have an important clinical impact. This could allow clinicians to early identify dialyzed chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients eligible for special transplant programs, preventive therapeutic strategies and specific post-transplant immunosuppressive treatments. To achieve these objectives, we retrospectively analyzed main demographic and clinical features, follow-up events and outcomes registered in a large dedicated dataset including 2,755 patients compiled collaboratively by four Italian renal/transplant units. The years of transplant ranged from 1984 to 2012. Statistical analysis clearly demonstrated that some recipients' characteristics at the time of transplantation (age and body weight) and dialysis-related variables (modality and duration) were significantly associated with DGF development (p ≤ 0.001). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the final model based on the four identified variables predicting DGF was 0.63 (95 % CI 0.61, 0.65). Additionally, deciles of the score were significantly associated with the incidence of DGF (p value for trend <0.001). Therefore, in conclusion, in our study we identified a pre-operative predictive model for DGF, based on inexpensive and easily available variables, potentially useful in routine clinical practice in most of the Italian and European dialysis units.
    Internal and Emergency Medicine 08/2014; 10(2). DOI:10.1007/s11739-014-1119-y · 2.41 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Despite a continuously growing knowledge of the impact of factors on kidney graft function, such as donor age, body mass index and cold ischemia time, few data are available regarding anastomosis time (AT) and its impact on long-term results. We investigated whether surgical AT correlates with patient and graft survival after kidney transplantation performing a retrospective analysis of 1245 consecutive deceased donor kidney transplantations between 01/2000 and 12/2010 at Innsbruck Medical University. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analyses were carried out for one and five year patient and graft survival. Anastomosis time was defined as time from anastomosis start until reperfusion. Median AT was 30 minutes. Five-year survival of allografts with an AT >30 minutes was 76.6% compared to 80.6% in the group with AT <30 minutes (p=0.027). Patient survival in the group with higher AT similarly was inferior with 85.7% after five years compared to 86.9% (p<0.0001). Cox regression analysis revealed AT as an independent significant factor for patient survival (HR 1.021 per minute; 95% CI 1.006 to 1.037; p=0.006). As longer AT closely correlates with inferior long-term patient survival, it has to be considered as a major risk factor for inferior long-term results after deceased donor kidney transplantation.This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Transplant International 01/2015; 28(5). DOI:10.1111/tri.12516 · 3.16 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014