The fourth year of medical education: a literature review.

Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine-Wichita, Wichita, Kansas 67214, USA.
Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges (Impact Factor: 2.34). 09/2010; 85(11):1698-704. DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181f52dc6
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To identify expert recommendations and examples of programs that could be incorporated into curricular renewal of the fourth year of medical school.
In 2009, the authors searched the relevant literature published from 1974 to 2009 using PubMed; they then searched bibliographies and related articles. They consulted clerkship and residency program directors at their institution and accessed recommendations from national organizations.
Of the 66 publications reviewed, 40 focused on aspects of fourth-year education and 26 included the fourth year in general reviews. Long-standing concerns included clarifying the purpose of the year, the optimal type and organization of courses, and academic quality of courses. Specific concerns included excessive focus on securing residency positions ("preresidency syndrome"), uncertainty about the optimal ratio of required and elective courses, and grade inflation.
Despite representing a substantial proportion of the student experience, the fourth year has received significantly less attention than other phases of the curriculum. The authors conclude that goals for the year should be clarified, reflect the mission of the school, and be designed to both complete the medical school experience and facilitate the transition to residency. Schools should decide the types of courses and organization of the year based on these goals. Organizational strategies for the fourth year should incorporate the requirements of the United States Medical Licensing Examination examinations and the residency application process. Fourth-year curricula and their constituent courses should be well designed and stringently evaluated to ensure educational goals are met and appropriate grades awarded.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives: To characterize junior residents' perspectives on the purpose, value, and potential improvement of the final year of medical school. Methods: Eighteen interviews were conducted with junior residents who graduated from nine different medical schools and who were in internal medicine, surgery, and psychiatry programs at one institution in the United States. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed inductively for themes. Results: Participants' descriptions of the purpose of their recently completed final year of medical school contained three primary themes: residency-related purposes, interest-or need-based purposes, and transitional purposes. Partici-pants commented on the most valued aspects of the final year. Themes included opportunities to: prepare for resi-dency; assume a higher level of responsibility in patient care; pursue experiences of interest that added breadth of knowledge, skills and perspective; develop and/or clarify career plans; and enjoy a period of respite. Suggestions for improvement included enhancing the learning value of clinical electives, augmenting specific curricular content, and making the final year more purposeful and better aligned with career goals. Conclusions: The final year of medical school is a critical part of medical education for most learners, but careful attention is needed to ensure that the year is developmental-ly robust. Medical educators can facilitate this by creating structures to help students define personal and professional goals, identify opportunities to work toward these goals, and monitor progress so that the value of the final year is optimized and not exclusively focused on residency preparation.
    International Journal of Medical Education. 01/2012; 3.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Current undergraduate medical school curricular trends focus on both vertical integration of clinical knowledge into the traditionally basic science-dedicated curricula and increasing basic science education in the clinical years. This latter type of integration is more difficult and less reported on than the former. Here, we present an outline of a course wherein the primary learning and teaching objective is to integrate basic science anatomy knowledge with clinical education. The course was developed through collaboration by a multi-specialist course development team (composed of both basic scientists and physicians) and was founded in current adult learning theories. The course was designed to be widely applicable to multiple future specialties, using current published reports regarding the topics and clinical care areas relying heavily on anatomical knowledge regardless of specialist focus. To this end, the course focuses on the role of anatomy in the diagnosis and treatment of frequently encountered musculoskeletal conditions. Our iterative implementation and action research approach to this course development has yielded a curricular template for anatomy integration into clinical years. Key components for successful implementation of these types of courses, including content topic sequence, the faculty development team, learning approaches, and hidden curricula, were developed. We also report preliminary feedback from course stakeholders and lessons learned through the process. The purpose of this report is to enhance the current literature regarding basic science integration in the clinical years of medical school. Anat Sci Educ. © 2014 American Association of Anatomists.
    Anatomical Sciences Education 03/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The implementation of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones in the field of obstetrics and gynecology has arrived with Milestones Level One defined as the level expected of an incoming first-year resident. We designed, implemented, and evaluated a 4-week elective for fourth-year medical school students, which utilized a multimodal approach to teaching and assessing the Milestones Level One competencies. The 78-hour curriculum utilized traditional didactic lectures, flipped classroom active learning sessions, a simulated paging curriculum, simulation training, embalmed cadaver anatomical dissections, and fresh-frozen cadaver operative procedures. We performed an assessment of student knowledge and surgical skills before and after completion of the course. Students also received feedback on their assessment and management of eight simulated paging scenarios. Students completed course content satisfaction surveys at the completion of each of the 4 weeks. Students demonstrated improvement in knowledge and surgical skills at the completion of the course. Paging confidence trended toward improvement at the completion of the course. Student satisfaction was high for all of the course content, and the active learning components of the curriculum (flipped classroom, simulation, and anatomy sessions) had higher scores than the traditional didactics in all six categories of our student satisfaction survey. This pilot study demonstrates a practical approach for preparing fourth-year medical students for the expectations of Milestones Level One in obstetrics and gynecology. This curriculum can serve as a framework as medical schools and specific specialties work to meet the first steps of the ACGME's Next Accreditation System.
    Medical Education Online 11/2014; 19:25746. · 1.27 Impact Factor


Available from