Internal exposure: Linking bioavailability to effects

Swiss Federal Institute for Environmental Science and Technology (EAWAG).
Environmental Science and Technology (Impact Factor: 5.48). 01/2005; 38(23). DOI: 10.1021/es0406740
Source: OAI
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many studies in pharmacology, toxicology and environmental science require a method for determining the freely dissolved concentration of a target substance. A recently developed tool for this purpose is equilibrium passive sampling with polymeric materials. However, this method has rarely been applied to ionic organic substances, primarily due to limited availability of convenient sorption materials. This study introduces ion exchange membranes (IEMs) as a novel passive sampling material for organic ions. The partitioning of 4-ethylbenzene-1-sulfonate, 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid and pentachlorophenol to one anion exchange membrane (FAS) and of difenzoquat, nicotine and verapamil to one cation exchange membrane (FKS) was investigated. All test substances exhibited a sufficiently high affinity for the respective IEM with logarithmic IEM–water partition coefficients >2.3. Sorption equilibrium was established quickly, within several hours for the FAS membrane and within 1–3 days for the FKS membrane. For permanently charged substances the partitioning to the IEMs was independent of pH, but was influenced by the salt composition of the test solution. For all test substances sorption to IEM was dependent on the substance concentration. Bovine serum albumin–water partition coefficients determined by passive sampling with IEMs agree well with those determined by the conventional dialysis method. The results of this study indicate that IEMs exhibit the potential to measure freely dissolved concentrations of organic ions in a simple and time-saving manner.
    Journal of Chromatography A 10/2014; 1370. DOI:10.1016/j.chroma.2014.10.041 · 4.26 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The chorion and the perivitellin space which surround unhatched zebrafish embryos (ZFE, Danio rerio) may affect the determination of internal concentrations of study compounds taken up in early life-stages of ZFE. Internal concentration-time profiles were gathered for benzocaine, caffeine, clofibric acid, metribuzin and phenacetin as study compounds over 96 hours of exposure starting with ZFE at 4 hours post-fertilization. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) was used to determine the concentration of the study compounds from intact (i.e. unhatched), dechorionated and from hatched ZFE. The mass of the study compounds per ZFE was 5–30 ng higher for intact ZFE compared to dechorionated ones. Thus, internal concentrations were overestimated if only intact ZFE were analyzed. Dechorionation of unhatched ZFE after their exposure is proposed to determine the true internal concentration in the embryo. For the compounds studied here the mass of the study compounds determined in unhatched ZFE after a short term (5 min) exposure provided a reasonable estimate of the mass taken up by the chorion and the PVS. This mass can be subtracted from the total mass found in unhatched ZFE to calculate the true internal mass. Estimating the mass in the chorion and the PVS from the concentration of the study compound in the external exposure medium and the volume of the PVS provided no reasonable results.
    Aquatic Toxicology 12/2014; DOI:10.1016/j.aquatox.2014.10.008 · 3.51 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Ecotoxicological effect data are generally expressed as effective concentrations in the external exposure medium and do thus not account for differences in chemical uptake, bioavailability, and metabolism, which can introduce substantial data variation. The Critical Body Residue (CBR) concept provides clear advantages, because it links effects directly to the internal exposure. Using CBRs instead of external concentrations should therefore reduce variability. For compounds that act via narcosis even a constant CBR has been proposed. Despite the expected uniformity, CBR values for these compounds still show large variability, possibly due to biased and inconsistent experimental testing. In the present study we tested whether variation in CBR data can be substantially reduced when using an improved experimental design and avoiding confounding factors. The aim was to develop and apply a well-defined test protocol for accurately and precisely measuring CBR data, involving improved (passive) dosing, sampling, and processing of organisms. The chemicals 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, 1,2,3,4-tetrachlorobenzene, 2,3,4-trichloroaniline, 2,3,5,6-tetrachloroaniline, 4-chloro-3-methylphenol, pentylbenzene, pyrene, and bromophos-methyl were tested on Lumbriculus variegatus (California blackworm), Hyalella azteca (scud), and Poecilia reticulata (guppy), which yielded a high-quality database of 348 individual CBR values. Medians of CBR values ranged from 2.1 to 16.1 mmol/kg wet weight (ww) within all combinations of chemicals and species, except for the insecticide bromophos-methyl, for which the median was 1.3 mmol/kg ww. The new database thus covers about one log unit, which is considerably less than in existing databases. Medians differed maximally by a factor of 8.4 between the 7 chemicals but within one species, and by a factor of 2.6 between the three species but for individual chemicals. Accounting for the chemicals' internal distribution to different partitioning domains and relating effects to estimated concentrations in the target compartment (i.e., membrane lipids) was expected to but did not decrease the overall variability, likely because the surrogate partition coefficients for membrane lipid, storage lipid, protein, and carbohydrate that were used as input parameters did not sufficiently represent the actual partitioning processes. The results of this study demonstrate that a well-designed test setup can produce CBR data that are highly uniform beyond chemical and biological diversity.
    Environmental Science & Technology 02/2015; 49:1879-1887. DOI:10.1021/es505078r · 5.48 Impact Factor