Risky Decisions and Their Consequences: Neural Processing by Boys with Antisocial Substance Disorder

Substance Dependence Division, Psychiatry Department, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA.
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 09/2010; 5(9):e12835. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012835
Source: PubMed


Adolescents with conduct and substance problems ("Antisocial Substance Disorder" (ASD)) repeatedly engage in risky antisocial and drug-using behaviors. We hypothesized that, during processing of risky decisions and resulting rewards and punishments, brain activation would differ between abstinent ASD boys and comparison boys.
We compared 20 abstinent adolescent male patients in treatment for ASD with 20 community controls, examining rapid event-related blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) responses during functional magnetic resonance imaging. In 90 decision trials participants chose to make either a cautious response that earned one cent, or a risky response that would either gain 5 cents or lose 10 cents; odds of losing increased as the game progressed. We also examined those times when subjects experienced wins, or separately losses, from their risky choices. We contrasted decision trials against very similar comparison trials requiring no decisions, using whole-brain BOLD-response analyses of group differences, corrected for multiple comparisons. During decision-making ASD boys showed hypoactivation in numerous brain regions robustly activated by controls, including orbitofrontal and dorsolateral prefrontal cortices, anterior cingulate, basal ganglia, insula, amygdala, hippocampus, and cerebellum. While experiencing wins, ASD boys had significantly less activity than controls in anterior cingulate, temporal regions, and cerebellum, with more activity nowhere. During losses ASD boys had significantly more activity than controls in orbitofrontal cortex, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, brain stem, and cerebellum, with less activity nowhere.
Adolescent boys with ASD had extensive neural hypoactivity during risky decision-making, coupled with decreased activity during reward and increased activity during loss. These neural patterns may underlie the dangerous, excessive, sustained risk-taking of such boys. The findings suggest that the dysphoria, reward insensitivity, and suppressed neural activity observed among older addicted persons also characterize youths early in the development of substance use disorders.

Download full-text


Available from: Carl W Lejuez,
  • Source
    • "In other clinical cohorts such as in those with anxiety and attention disorders, behavioral and conduct disorders have been linked with abnormal structure and activity of subcortical regions such as the caudate , striatum, amygdala, and the hippocampus. Lower functional activity of the amygdala, hippocampus, and the striatum has been seen in youth with conduct disorders [Crowley et al., 2010; Fairchild et al., 2013; Marsh et al., 2013], while smaller thalamus are found in children with ADHD [Xia et al., 2012]. In contrast, negative or nonsignificant relationships in brain-behavior relationships have been reported previously both in typical children [Lebel et al., 2010] and in typical older populations [Gautam et al., 2011]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Children with prenatal alcohol exposure (PAE) may have cognitive, behavioral and brain abnormalities. Here, we compare rates of white matter and subcortical gray matter volume change in PAE and control children, and examine relationships between annual volume change and arithmetic ability, behavior, and executive function. Participants (n = 75 PAE/64 control; age: 7.1-15.9 years) each received two structural magnetic resonance scans, ∼2 years apart. Assessments included Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV), the Child Behavior Checklist and the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function. Subcortical white and gray volumes were extracted for each hemisphere. Group volume differences were tested using false discovery rate (q < 0.05). Analyses examined group-by-age interactions and group-score interactions for correlations between change in volume and raw behavioral scores. Results showed that subjects with PAE had smaller volumes than control subjects across the brain. Significant group-score interactions were found in temporal and parietal regions for WISC arithmetic scores and in frontal and parietal regions for behavioral measures. Poorer cognitive/ behavioral outcomes were associated with larger volume increases in PAE, while control subjects generally showed no significant correlations. In contrast with previous results demonstrating different trajectories of cortical volume change in PAE, our results show similar rates of subcortical volume growth in subjects with PAE and control subjects. We also demonstrate abnormal brain-behavior relationships in subjects with PAE, suggesting different use of brain resources. Our results are encouraging in that, due to the stable volume differences, there may be an extended window of opportunity for intervention in children with PAE. Hum Brain Mapp, 2015. © 2015 The Authors Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Human Brain Mapping 02/2015; 36(6). DOI:10.1002/hbm.22772 · 5.97 Impact Factor
    • "This will lead to poorer decision-making and frustration. This is particularly the case given potential additional impairments in the representation of reinforcement expected values within vmPFC (Crowley et al. 2010; Finger et al. 2008, 2011; Rubia et al. 2009b; White et al. 2013c). Studies have reported reduced striatal (though not vmPFC) activity to reward anticipation in individuals with ADHD (Plichta et al. 2009; Scheres et al. 2007; Strohle et al. 2008). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The disruptive behavior disorders Disruptive behavior disorders include Conduct Disorder (CD) Conduct Disorder (CD) , Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) , and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). These disorders are highly comorbid with each other as well as with mood and anxiety disorders and personality disorders (particularly borderline personality disorder). The goal of this chapter is to consider these disorders from an RDoC(ish) approach. In other words, we will outline four functional processes and the behavioral implications of dysfunction within these processes. Moreover, we will briefly consider how dysfunction in one might increase the risk for the development of rather different behavioral problems that have been previously associated with rather different disorders. Our goal is to identify neurocognitive-based functional targets for treatment.
    Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences 09/2013; 16. DOI:10.1007/7854_2013_247
  • Source
    • "The amygdala has long been implicated in affective processing (Sterzer et al., 2005, Marsh et al., 2008; for meta-analysis see Marsh and Blair, 2008) and decision-making (e.g. Crowley et al., 2010), and is likely part of an important valuation circuit that includes the medial OFC (Padoa-Schioppa and Assad, 2006; Schoenbaum and Roesch, 2005). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Antisocial traits are common among alcoholics- particularly in certain subtypes. Although people with antisocial tendencies show atypical brain activation in some emotion and reward paradigms, how the brain reward systems of heavy drinkers (HD) are influenced by antisocial traits remains unclear. We used subjects' preferred alcohol drink odors (AO), appetitive (ApCO) and non-appetitive (NApO) control odors in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to determine if reward system responses varied as a function of antisocial trait density (ASD). In this retrospective analysis, we examined 30 HD who had participated in imaging twice: once while exposed to clamped intravenous alcohol infusion targeted to 50mg%, and once during placebo saline infusion. Under placebo, there were positive correlations between ASD and blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) activation in the [AO>ApCO] contrast in the left dorsal putamen, while negative correlations were present in medial orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) and the bilateral amygdala. A similar pattern was observed in the correlation with the [AO>NApO] contrast. This inverse relationship between ASD and activation in OFC and amygdala was specific to AO. However, negative correlations between ASD and the [ApCO>NApO] contrast were also present in the insula, putamen, and medial frontal cortex. These data suggest that frontal and limbic reward circuits of those with significant ASD are less responsive to reward cues in general, and particularly to alcohol cues in medial OFC and amygdala. These findings are broadly consistent with the reward deficiency syndrome hypothesis, although positive correlation in the striatum suggests regional variability.
    NeuroImage 03/2012; 60(1):644-52. DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.12.043 · 6.36 Impact Factor
Show more