Adolescent development and risk of injury: Using developmental science to improve interventions

Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Injury Prevention (Impact Factor: 1.89). 09/2010; 17(1):50-4. DOI: 10.1136/ip.2010.028126
Source: PubMed


In adolescence, there is a complex interaction among physical, cognitive, and psychosocial developmental processes, culminating in greater risk-taking and novelty-seeking. Concurrently, adolescents face an increasingly demanding environment, which results in heightened vulnerability to injury. In this paper, we provide an overview of developmental considerations for adolescent injury interventions based on developmental science, including findings from behavioural neuroscience and psychology. We examine the role that typical developmental processes play in the way adolescents perceive and respond to risk and how this integrated body of developmental research adds to our understanding of how to do injury prevention with adolescents. We then highlight strategies to improve the translation of developmental research into adolescent injury prevention practice, calling on examples of existing interventions including graduated driver licensing.

Download full-text


Available from: Sara Burr Johnson, Jul 29, 2015
  • Source
    • "A related characteristic that is also greater in adolescents is impulsivity, the tendency to act without adequate consideration of the consequences [40]. Both tendencies are stronger in males [41] and have been the focus of commentaries on the role of brain development in adolescent risky driving [11] [12] However, unlike sensation seeking, impulsivity is characterized by a deficit in attention skills [41], an extreme form of which is apparent in ADHD, which presents with both impulsive and attentional problems [42]. When the effects of sensation seeking are separated from impulsivity, impulsivity appears to be the more serious predictor of risky behavior [43] [44]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Motor vehicle crashes are the leading source of morbidity and mortality in adolescents in the United States and the developed world. Inadequate allocation of attention to the driving task and to driving hazards are important sources of adolescent crashes. We review major explanations for these attention failures with particular focus on the roles that brain immaturity and lack of driving experience play in causing attention problems. The review suggests that the potential for overcoming inexperience and immaturity with training to improve attention to both the driving task and hazards is substantial. Nevertheless, there are large individual differences in both attentional abilities and risky driving tendencies that pose challenges to novice driver policies. Research that can provide evidence-based direction for such policies is urgently needed.
  • Source
    • "though such differences are likely [11]. Another limitation is the failure to examine the combination of age and sex either as an interaction or to define driver groups. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Much is known about sex and age differences in collision types, but most studies have examined the effect of declining physical and mental capabilities on older drivers' performance. Fewer studies have focused on the relationship between younger driver's sex and crash type, and these studies have largely ignored the multidimensionality of crashes, have not consistently examined sex differences, and are based on outdated data. This study addressed these issues by examining differences in the likelihood of involvement in seven crash configurations between adolescent and adult male and female drivers. Fatal crash data from the Fatality Analysis Reporting System and nonfatal crash data from the General Estimation System for years 2005-2009 were used. Crash configurations were identified using point of initial impact, manner of collision, and vehicle action (i.e., striking or struck). Logistic regression estimated relative odds ratios among four driver groups: male and female drivers aged 15-19 years, and male and female drivers aged 45-64 years. Crash likelihood varied dramatically by driver age and sex across crash configuration. Adolescent male drivers were most likely to be in single-vehicle and fatal head-on crashes; adolescent drivers had a higher likelihood of front-to-rear crashes; adults had the highest likelihood of rear-end crashes; and female drivers had higher likelihoods of left- and right-side crashes. These findings may result from differences in driving experience, driving styles, or cognitive spatial abilities. Future research is needed to identify contributors to different crash configurations so that they can be directly addressed through tailored interventions and programs.
    Journal of Adolescent Health 11/2012; 51(5):484-90. DOI:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.02.012 · 3.61 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Serum α(1 → 3)-L-fucosyltransferase activity was measured in 58 patients with lung cancer, 27 benign diseases, and in 100 healthy controls. The levels of enzyme activity were significantly higher in the sera of patients with cancer when compared to those in benign diseases and healthy controls. The elevation of the enzyme activity correlated with the clinical stages and to the size of the primary tumors. Follow-up studies with various stages showed that the enzyme activity was useful in tracking the clinical course of disease after surgery. To evaluate the usefulness of this enzyme as a diagnostic marker, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and sialyl Lewis X-i antigen levels were also measured. The results indicate that α(1 → 3)-L-fucosyltransferase could be a more specific tumor marker than such tumor-associated antigens in lung cancer. Cancer 64:2541–2545, 1989.
    Cancer 12/1989; 64(12):2541 - 2545. DOI:10.1002/1097-0142(19891215)64:12<2541::AID-CNCR2820641222>3.0.CO;2-7 · 4.89 Impact Factor
Show more