Block Ownership, Trading Activity, and Market Liquidity

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (Impact Factor: 1.77). 01/2009; 44(06):1403-1426. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1117285
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT We examine the impact of block ownership on the firm s market liquidity. These adverse liquidity effects disappear, however, once we control for trading activity. Our findings suggest that block ownership is detrimental to the firm a real friction effect. After controlling for this real friction effect, we find little evidence that block ownership has a negative impact on informational friction. Our results suggest that the relative lack of trading, and not the threat of informed trading, explains the inverse relation between block ownership and market liquidity.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study examines the relation between the bid-ask spread from the daily CRSP data and the bid-ask spread from the intraday TAQ data. We show that the CRSP-based spread is highly correlated with the TAQ-based spread across stocks using data from 1993 through 2009. The simple CRSP-based spread provides a better approximation of the TAQ-based spread than all other low-frequency liquidity measures in cross-sectional settings. However, the CRSP-based spread is highly correlated with the TAQ spread in time-series settings only for NASDAQ stocks. Overall, our results suggest that the simple CRSP-based spread could be used in lieu of the TAQ-based spread in academic research that focuses on cross-sectional analysis.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Prior research reports increased stock transaction costs when informed trading is present. Recent studies suggest the transfer of privileged information via social ties. Combing these two literature streams, we document a significant, positive relation between a company's trading costs and the Wall Street social ties of its executives and directors. Social ties based on education, leisure activities, local ties, and ties to individuals responsible for trading have stronger effects. Exogenous severance of ties reduces trading costs and trading activities by connected parties. Firms with more ties to Wall Street exhibit reduced market reaction to official announcements of earnings and acquisitions.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We use transactions data from TORQ and present empirical evidence on the cross sectional relation between institutional trading and effective spread after controlling for trading volume denoting inventory and order processing costs and probability of informed trading (PIN) denoting risk of informed trading. We find that volume, information risk premium denoted by PIN times price, and institutional trading are significant determinants of bid ask spreads for a sample of 65 NYSE listed securities. We also find that institutional trading increases the adverse selection component but does not have a significant effect on order processing costs. The net effect of institutional trading on spread depends on the dominant effect, information increasing adverse selection costs or liquidity decreasing order processing costs. In our sample the increase in adverse selection costs trumps the decrease in order processing costs and as a consequence spread increases as institutional trading rises.
    Journal of Economics and Finance 12/2012; · 0.42 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 29, 2014