Do Behavioral Biases Vary across Individuals? Evidence from Individual Level 401(k) Data

Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis (Impact Factor: 1.77). 01/2006; 41(04):939-962. DOI: 10.1017/S0022109000002702
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper investigates whether some individuals are prone to behavioral biases in their 401(k) investments. Using demographic data and allocation information for over 73,000 employees, I examine two allocation biases and a participation bias. The findings suggest that higher salaried employees tend to make significantly better choices. Participants who earn $100, 000 hold 12. 7% less in company stock, are 3% less likely to follow the framing 1/n heuristic, and are 37.7% more likely to participate than those earning $46, 000. Women make better choices in two of the three cases and I find evidence of mental accounting.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: For a long list of investment “biases,” including lack of diversification, excessive trading, and the disposition effect, we find that genetic differences explain up to 45% of the remaining variation across individual investors, after controlling for observable individual characteristics. The evidence is consistent with a view that investment biases are manifestations of innate and evolutionary ancient features of human behavior. We find that work experience with finance reduces genetic predispositions to investment biases. Finally, we find that even genetically identical investors, who grew up in the same family environment, often differ substantially in their investment behaviors due to individual-specific experiences or events.
    Journal of Financial Economics 08/2014; · 3.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We design and implement a choice experiment to investigate the extent to which retirement savers follow standard mean-variance analysis when choosing from a menu of investment options. We conduct this survey twice: once during a period of …nancial tranquility (March 2007) and once during …nancial crisis (October 2008). Tranquil and crisis period results are assessed using the scale adjusted version of the latent class choice model. During the tranquil period, we identify income and age as important determinants of the preference classes, and underlying risk toler- ance and age as key determinants of variability (scale). Estimation of the marginal eects of variations in net expected returns and risk on choice of investment option reveals that classes populated by young and low income individuals as more likely
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study documents patterns of investor irrationality in Finnish rights issues. Current shareholders of issuing companies lost at least MEUR 9.9 from 1995 to 2002 by exercising rights too early, selling rights in the open market below their intrinsic value, or leaving rights unexercised. Investors with small portfolios, inactive trading history, those who know neither of the official languages, or who are living abroad are most likely to act irrationally. The overall conclusion is that low sophistication and the costs of becoming informed contribute to irrational behavior.


1 Download
Available from