Can firms do well while doing good?

Applied Financial Economics 06/2010; 20(11):845-860. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.794790
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT We investigate the relationship between a firm's degree of social responsibility and its performance. To accomplish this objective, we examine the stock market reaction to the announcement of Fortune magazine's list of 100 Best Companies to Work For over the 1998-2003 period. We find significant positive excess returns, which indicate that being included on the list is viewed positively by the stock market. To explain the positive abnormal performance, we regress the excess returns against firm-specific variables. Excess return has a positive relation to the job growth rate, but not to firm rank, on a pre-listing basis. However, the additional analysis reveals that the firms with a more favourable ranking are relatively small and have a higher job growth rate, low employee turnover, high betas and extremely positive stock market performance prior to their inclusion on the list. In the year following the publication, sample firms with a favourable ranking have higher sales and gross profit margin than their lower-ranked counterparts. Overall, the results indicate that firms exhibiting a high degree of social responsibility towards their employees are positively rewarded by stock market participants, and that the rankings are somewhat related to pre- and post-survey financial performance.


Available from: Parvez Ahmed, May 23, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Greening has become a powerful idea in corporate strategy. Firms engaged in greening often seek and cherish external validations such as being an active participant in UN’s Global Compact. This paper examines the investment performance of firms who were named in Newsweek's annual survey of most green companies. Results show that there is no direct relationship between a higher Newsweek Green Ranking and performance. However, firms after being named in the Newsweek survey had better return performance than in the year prior to being named although this difference in return was not statistically significant. The results are nonetheless important as it allows investors to separate good external validators of greening from those external validators who may have wide media recognition but are a perhaps a lagging indicator of greening.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: With a meta-analysis of 85 studies and 190 experiments, the authors test the relationship between socially responsible investing (SRI) and financial performance to determine whether including corporate social responsibility and ethical concerns in portfolio management is more profitable than conventional investment policies. The study also analyses the influence of researcher methodologies with respect to several dimensions of SRI (markets, financial performance measures, investment horizons, SRI thematic approaches, family investments and journal impact) on the effects identified. The results indicate that the consideration of corporate social responsibility in stock market portfolios is neither a weakness nor a strength compared with conventional investments; the heterogeneous results in prior studies largely reflect the SRI dimensions under study (e.g. thematic approach, investment horizon and data comparison method).
    Business Ethics A European Review 04/2015; 24(2):158-185. DOI:10.1111/beer.12076 · 0.91 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The role of a corporation is often debated as a mutually exclusive choice between economic responsibility to shareholders and social responsibility to society. An evolving viewpoint embraces an integrated approach focused on long-term value creation for shareholders which benefits other stakeholders. Maximizing long-term shareholder value as a corporate objective can be compatible with stakeholder theory when an enlightened shareholder maximization strategy is embraced. Firms implementing an enlightened shareholder maximization strategy are expected to make decisions and use resources which achieve long-term value-creating outcomes. However, critics of enlightened shareholder maximization as a corporate goal contend this strategy conflicts with maximizing shareholder value. This study explores whether firms which embrace a balanced enlightened shareholder maximization strategy indeed create long-term value which does not sacrifice shareholder wealth.
    Journal of Business Ethics 03/2014; 127(3). DOI:10.1007/s10551-014-2070-6 · 0.96 Impact Factor