Economists, Incentives, Judgment, and the European CVAR Approach to Macroeconometrics

Economics E-Journal (Impact Factor: 0.64). 01/2009; 3(9):1-21. DOI: 10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2009-9
Source: RePEc


This paper argues that the DSGE approach to macroeconometrics is the dominant approach because it meets the institutional needs of the replicator dynamics of the profession, not because it is necessarily the best way to do macroeconometrics. It further argues that this 'DSGE theory-first' approach is inconsistent with the historical approach that economists have advocated in the past and that the alternative European CVAR approach is much more consistent with economist's historically used methodology, correctly understood. However, because the European CVAR approach requires explicit researcher judgment, it does not do well in the replicator dynamics of the profession. The paper concludes with the suggestion that there should be an increase in dialog between the two approaches. --

Download full-text


Available from: David Colander, Apr 02, 2014
23 Reads
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper argues that the reason that the DSGE model, which has proved so successful in convincing academic economists of its value, has made relatively few inroads into the undergraduate teaching sphere is that it fails to allow for the development of higher order educational objectives in students. The qualities which make it attractive to academics, such as the purity of its assumptions and its sound microeconomic basis, have little resonance with undergraduate students. Instead, the qualities of the neo-Keynesian model, such as its ability to incorporate 'real-world' institutional features and the ease with which it can be used to develop higher order skills and applications, prove much more attractive.
    SSRN Electronic Journal 06/2009; 10(2):7-15. DOI:10.2139/ssrn.1433568
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2007-2008, the world economy came perilously close to a systemic failure in which a financial system collapse almost undermined the entire world economy as we know it. These events have led some to fault the economics profession for its failure to predict the crisis, and to ask whether the crisis will lead the economics profession to change its ways. In this paper, I will discuss these two issues, and then turn to some suggestions for institutional changes in the economics profession that might lead to better outcomes in the future.
    Journal of Economic Methodology 12/2010; 17(4):419-427. DOI:10.1080/1350178X.2010.525039
Show more