Task partitioning increases reproductive output in a cooperative bird

Behavioral Ecology (Impact Factor: 3.22). 01/2008; 19(6):1136-1142. DOI:10.1093/beheco/arn097
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Parents often face a trade-off between the quality and quantity of young produced because terminating investment in current young could result in lower survival and future reproductive success, whereas initiating new breeding attempts could result in greater production of young. In cooperatively breeding species, helpers may alleviate this trade-off by assuming the role of primary caregivers to first broods, liberating breeders to initiate subsequent breeding attempts without compromising the level of care offspring receive. Here, we investigate the occurrence and consequences of brood overlap in the cooperatively breeding pied babbler (Turdoides bicolor). Brood overlap occurred only in groups and resulted in breeders primarily investing in second broods while helpers continued to provide care to first broods, resulting in dependent young from overlapping broods being raised simultaneously. Interbrood partitioning of care during brood overlap resulted in a greater production of young per season in groups (cf., pairs) without any effect on offspring survival, thus representing a reproductive benefit of task partitioning in cooperatively breeding species. Copyright 2008, Oxford University Press.

0 0
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many cooperative bird species have an extended period of post-fledging care. Despite the fact that this period of care can last up to several months, it remains a relatively understudied stage of chick development. This period, when young are actively begging but highly mobile, provides an opportunity for young to maximise the amount of care they receive by selectively choosing particular adults to beg from. In pied babblers Turdoides bicolor (a cooperatively breeding passerine), fledglings closely follow foraging adults and beg for food regularly (a behavioural interaction termed social foraging). Using a combination of natural observations and experimental manipulations, we found that fledgling pied babblers preferentially socially forage with adult care-givers who have high foraging success, since this results in young receiving more food. By supplementally feeding adults to artificially increase their foraging success, we increased the proportion of time that fledglings chose to socially forage with them, confirming that fledglings are selectively choosing dyadic interactions with the best adult foragers. These results indicate that pied babbler fledglings are sensitive to and can respond to short-term changes in adult foraging success, enabling them to maximize their nutritional intake, a behavioural adjustment that has long-term benefits in this system.
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 10/2012; 67(1):69-78. · 2.75 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Behaviour is typically regarded as among the most flexible of animal phenotypic traits. In particular, expression of cooperative behaviour is often assumed to be conditional upon the behaviours of others. This flexibility is a key component of many hypothesized mechanisms favouring the evolution of cooperative behaviour. However, evidence shows that cooperative behaviours are often less flexible than expected and that, in many species, individuals show consistent differences in the amount and type of cooperative and non-cooperative behaviours displayed. This phenomenon is known as 'animal personality' or a 'behavioural syndrome'. Animal personality is evolutionarily relevant, as it typically shows heritable variation and can entail fitness consequences, and hence, is subject to evolutionary change. Here, we review the empirical evidence for individual variation in cooperative behaviour across taxa, we examine the evolutionary processes that have been invoked to explain the existence of individual variation in cooperative behaviour and we discuss the consequences of consistent individual differences on the evolutionary stability of cooperation. We highlight that consistent individual variation in cooperativeness can both stabilize or disrupt cooperation in populations. We conclude that recognizing the existence of consistent individual differences in cooperativeness is essential for an understanding of the evolution and prevalence of cooperation.
    Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society B Biological Sciences 09/2010; 365(1553):2751-64. · 6.23 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Seasonal patterns in territorial behaviour are common in many species, and are often attributed to the adaptive benefits of increased defence or the provision of information to potential competitors or mates during the breeding season. However, because defence behaviour is likely to be costly in terms of time and energy, an alternative possibility is that decreases in the nonbreeding season are a consequence of reduced food availability. We studied territoriality in the pied babbler, Turdoides bicolor, a cooperatively breeding bird species that defends permanent territories. Groups interacted with rivals less and responded less strongly to an experimentally simulated intrusion of neighbours in nonbreeding periods compared to the breeding season. Foraging efficiency and biomass intake were significantly lower in the nonbreeding season, which resulted in birds being significantly lighter at this time of year. Finally, a feeding experiment in the nonbreeding season showed that groups given supplementary food significantly increased their response to a simulated territorial intrusion. These results indicate that the reduction in territorial behaviour during the nonbreeding season may be attributed, at least in part, to a reduction in food availability. We suggest that future studies on seasonal variation in territorial behaviour, especially those investigating species in which two or more individuals combine their defence, should take this potential constraint into account.
    Animal Behaviour 01/2011; 83(3):613-619. · 3.07 Impact Factor


Available from
Mar 18, 2013