An Even Sterner Review: Introducing Relative Prices into the Discounting Debate

Review of Environmental Economics and Policy (Impact Factor: 2.15). 04/2008; 2(1):61-76. DOI: 10.1093/reep/rem024
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT The existing literature on climate change offers little guidance on why one specification or another of a "damages function" has been selected. Ideally, one wants a functional form that captures reality adequately, yet is analytically sufficiently tractable to yield useful results. This paper gives two plausible risk aversion axioms that a reduced form utility function of temperature change and the capacity to produce consumption might reasonably be required to satisfy. These axioms indicate that the standard-practice multiplicative specification of disutility damages from global warming, as well as its additive analogue, are special cases of this paper's theoretically derived utility function. Empirically, the paper gives some numerical examples demonstrating the surprisingly strong implications for economic policy of the distinction between additive and multiplicative disutility damages.

Download full-text


Available from: Thomas Sterner, Jul 07, 2015
  • Source
    • "Examples of adaptive coping include migration and changing crop technology. General equilibrium effects include relative price changes and substitution responses (Sterner & Persson, 2008). Transformative adaptation, a complete revamp of a social–ecological system in order to become adaptive, would be incorporated in this model as either adaptive coping or protective adaptation. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In order to increase adaptive capacity and empower people to cope with their changing environment, it is imperative to develop decision-support tools that help people understand and respond to challenges and opportunities. Some such tools have emerged in response to social and economic shifts in light of anticipated climatic change. Climate change will play out at the local level, and adaptive behaviours will be influenced by local resources and knowledge. Community-based insights are essential building blocks for effective planning. However, in order to mainstream and scale up adaptation, it is useful to have mechanisms for evaluating the benefits and costs of candidate adaptation strategies. This article reviews relevant literature and presents an argument in favour of using various modelling tools directed at these considerations. The authors also provide evidence for the balancing of qualitative and quantitative elements in assessments of programme proposals considered for financing through mechanisms that have the potential to scale up effective adaptation, such as the Adaptation Fund under the Kyoto Protocol. The article concludes that it is important that researchers and practitioners maintain flexibility in their analyses, so that they are themselves adaptable, to allow communities to best manage the emerging challenges of climate change and the long-standing challenges of development.
    Climate and Development 11/2014; 6(4). DOI:10.1080/17565529.2014.912196 · 1.21 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Different from Q1 and Q2, paths are said to represent " well-being per person — reflecting private consumption, public services, and services provided by nature. " The importance of the latter for integrated assessment models is demonstrated by (Hoel and Sterner, 2007) and (Sterner and Persson, 2008). The purpose of the second questionnaire is to see how these types of overshoots influence implicit discount rates. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Climate policy recommendations differ widely because of disagreements over what discount rates to use. Disagreement reduces the impact of economic models and signals a need for improved methodology. The problem is related to the choice of intergenerational welfare functions. A first questionnaire finds that the standard welfare function (SWF) fails to capture people's dislike of overshooting and fluctuating consumption paths. A second questionnaire reveals that when very-long-term sustainability of well-being is threatened, people's implicit discount rates resemble the low estimates used by the Stern Review. An alternative welfare function (AWF) reflecting consumption growth can potentially capture the preference structure revealed in both questionnaires. This makes the AWF an interesting candidate when searching for policies for sustainable development under uncertainty. Importantly, the questionnaires demonstrate that people are able to choose among policies by inspecting time graphs of policy consequences. Thus, it is possible to circumvent the complexities and disagreements introduced by welfare functions and discounting.
    Ecological Economics 06/2014; 102:158–166. DOI:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.003 · 2.52 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Considering limited substitution possibilities instead, and hence subscribing to a concept of relatively strong sustainability , requires choosing a value for σ below 1 (e.g., Gerlagh and van der Zwaan 2002, Heal 2009, Bateman et al 2011, Traeger 2013). More specifically, Sterner and Persson (2008) suggest using σ = 0.5 in their study of the human-climate system. Instead of choosing a specific value for σ , we assume σ to be uniformly distributed between 0 and 1 and perform a Monte Carlo simulation ( = n 10 000) to recalculate the ocean-health index for 2012 and 2013 based on the equallyweighted individual goal scores obtained from the oceanhealth website. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Halpern et al (2012 An index to assess the health and benefits of the global ocean Nature 488 11397) propose a detailed measure of the state of the human-ocean system against ten societal goals. They devote less attention to the normative foundation of the index, which is crucial for assessing the overall health of the human-ocean system, notably when it comes to aggregation of potentially conflicting goals. Social choice theory provides several possible functional forms for assessing the compound change in various goals. The one chosen by Halpern et al, the arithmetical mean, is not only a specific but also an extreme case. It implicitly allows for unlimited substitution. A one-unit reduction in one goal can be fully offset by a one-unit increase in another with the same weighting factor. For that reason, the current index satisfies an extremely weak sustainability concept. We show that the results in Halpern et al are not robust when one adopts a strong sustainability concept. The overall health score of the ocean decreases, the ranking of the various coastal states changes substantially, and the assessment of sustainable development needs to be partially reversed.
    Environmental Research Letters 05/2014; 9(4):044013. DOI:10.1088/1748-9326/9/4/044013 · 4.09 Impact Factor