Management of perceptions of information technology service quality

Journal of Business Research (Impact Factor: 1.48). 09/2009; 62(9):876-882. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.10.005
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT The present study evaluates the perception gaps of service quality between information technology (IT) service providers and their clients. IT services require high investments, which make analyzing its effectiveness increasingly important. To do this analysis, this study uses the instrument SERVPERF of the SERVQUAL model. The research took place in a large Brazilian retail bank, which identified gaps in perceptions between IT service providers and its clients. The findings suggest opportunities for improvement in the quality of IT services from a strategic alignment perspective, particularly in the following dimensions: tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy. The study also indicates some enhancements for the SERVQUAL model.

Download full-text


Available from: Norberto Hoppen, Nov 24, 2014
73 Reads
  • Source
    • "Roses, Hoppen, and Henrique (2009) identify gaps in the perception of consulting service quality between service providers and customers. Roses et al. (2009) also suggest opportunities to improve the quality in some dimensions from a strategic alignment perspective. 2.2. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study explores whether consulting service clients' degree of satisfaction can explain differences in consulting service fees to the same clients. By monitoring factors having a relationship with consulting fees as well as consulting service quality attributes, this study notes that client satisfaction with consulting team positively and strongly affects consulting fees. A dimension of consulting client satisfaction, which is not a consulting service quality attribute, is the factor that better explains consulting service pricing. This satisfaction dimension may allow consultants to charge higher fees through higher leverage while setting prices during contracting process. Clients' satisfaction with consulting firms appears to be unimportant in the consulting service market. Results emphasize that individuals' participation in consulting processes is essential for consulting firms to be able to single out their consulting services.
    Journal of Business Research 02/2015; 68(7). DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.01.033 · 1.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Unfortunately, these traditional measures were found to have some serious shortcomings when used to measure the service performance of IT departments (WATSON et al., 1993; KANG & BRADLEY, 2002). On the other hand, an effective service analysis of the services produced by IT division for other organizational divisions, or IT client divisions, should take into consideration how these clients perceive IT services (ROSES et al., 2009). The concept of service quality as a measure of performance originated from the field of marketing, which proposes that there is a need for organizations to understand and measure customer expectation (KANG & BRADLEY, 2002). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Information Technology Support Services (ITSS) are playing an important role to the companies which wish for more efficiency and competitive advantages. For doing so, the starting point is to identify the real stage the services are on by aassessing the quality of services that have been provided. This paper presents some results obtained from an experimental analysis conducted in order to analyze the application of an evaluation model of IT support services according to the perspectives of the users. ELECTRE TRI method was used to assign the IT support services into one of the predefined categories; Cronbach’s  coefficient was used to measure the model reliability and quartile analysis was used to determine the most critical criteria.
    XIX International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, ICIEOM 2013, Valladolid, Spain; 07/2013
  • Source
    • ", Berry & Parasuraman (1997), Watson et al. (1998), Zeithaml et al. (2000), Liu & Arnett (2000), Cox & Dale (2001), Yoo & Douthu (2001), Zeithaml et al. (2002), Zeithaml (2002), Wolfinbarger & Gilly (2003), Wilkin & Castleman (2003), Landrum & Prybutok (2004), Yang & Fang (2004), Parasuraman et al. (2005), Kettinger & Lee (2005), Yang et al. (2005), Lai (2006), Lee & Kozar (2006), Bauer et al. (2006), Fassnacht & Koese (2006), Hwang & Kim (2007), Cristobal et al. (2007), Loiacono et al. (2007), Rauyruen & Miller (2007), Roses et al. (2009), McManus ( 2009), Park & Gretzel (2007), Ding et al.(2010), Udo et al.(2010). Brigham (2001), McLoughlin & Luca (2001), Frydenber (2002), Mcgorry (2003), Chiu et al.(2005), Reid (2005), Oliver (2005), MacDonald & Thompson (2005), Roca et al. (2006), Holsapple & Lee Post (2006), Wang et al. (2007), Lee & Lee (2008), Wang & Wang (2009), Ozkan & Koseler (2009), Ramayah et al. (2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Education is considered to be one of the sectors that have been radically affected by developments in information technology. E-learning is believed to be the main outcome of adopting and using the new and more advanced information technology in the education sector. In spite of this rapid growth in the elearning field there still exists a range of issues facing the stakeholders of e-learning systems. One of the key issues is measuring e-learning system success. Although considerable attention has been paid to the information systems success issue, there remain arguments about the factors which are most effective in measuring information system success. The issue of measuring information system success has an impact on evaluating e-learning systems success as well. This study aims to fill this void by proposing an evaluation methodology model to assess e-learning systems success. The contribution of this study is the proposed model to assess e-learning systems success. The model is based on a thorough review of the e-learning success literature and existing IS success models. A range of stakeholders such as Academic staff, students, and ICT staff are considered in this model.
    Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems, PACIS 2011: Quality Research in Pacific Asia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 7-11 July 2011; 07/2011
Show more