A Spatial Explanation for the Balassa-Samuelson Effect

Center for Firms in the Global Economy, CeFiG Working Papers 01/2008;
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT We propose a simple spatial model to explain why the price level is higher in rich countries. There are two sectors: manufacturing, which is freely tradable, and non-tradable services, which have to locate near customers in big cities. As countries develop, total factor productivity increases simultaneously in both sectors. However, because services compete with the population for scarce land, labor productivity will grow slower in services than in manufacturing. Services become more expensive, and the aggregate price level becomes higher. The model hence provides a theoretical foundation for the Balassa--Samuelson assumption that productivity growth is slower in the non-tradable sector than in the tradable sector. Empirical results confirm two key implications of the theory. First, we compare countries where land is scarce (densely populated, highly urban countries) to rural countries. The Balassa--Samuelson effect is stronger among urban countries. Second, we compare sectors that locate at different distance to consumers. The Balassa--Samuelson effect is stronger within sectors that locate closer to consumers.


Available from: Miklós Koren, Jun 12, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: I assess the relative performance of several empirical proxies developed in the literature of asset pricing to capture time-variation in expected future returns using data for the U.S. and the U.K.. I show that the wealth composition risk by Sousa (2010) exhibits strong forecasting power.
    SSRN Electronic Journal 01/2005; 54(5333). DOI:10.2139/ssrn.596462
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper studies the Balassa-Samuelson effect in 9 CEECs . Using panel cointegration techniques, we find strong empirical evidence in favour of what we call the internal transmission mechanism since productivity growth in the open sector is found to bring about non-tradable inflation. However, we also shed new light on the fact that the impact of the internal transmission mechanism on overall inflation is considerably attenuated by the low share of non-tradables in the consumer price index. Furthermore, we argue that because of this and the high share of food items and regulated prices, the CPI may be misleading when analysing the Balassa-Samuelson effect. The paper also shows that the appreciation of the transition economies' real exchange rate, which has become something of a stylised fact over the last decade is only partly caused not the Balassa-Samuelson effect. Instead, we argue that a trend increase in tradable prices is behind this phenomenon.
    SSRN Electronic Journal 08/2002; DOI:10.2139/ssrn.320884
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we document that the disparity in employment densities across US metropolitan areas has lessened substantially over the postwar period. To account for this deconcentration of metropolitan employment, we develop a system-of-cities model in which an increase in aggregate metropolitan employment causes congestion costs to increase faster for the more dense metro areas. A calibrated version of the model reveals that the (roughly) two-and-a-half-fold increase in postwar aggregate metropolitan employment implies, by itself, more deconcentration than actually observed. Thus, rising aggregate metropolitan employment is a powerful force favoring deconcentration, although some benefit of greater employment density appears to have partially offset the effects of rising congestion costs for the more dense metro areas.
    Journal of Monetary Economics 02/2001; 48(3-48):549-583. DOI:10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00085-X · 1.89 Impact Factor