Article

Sweet Diversity: Colonial Goods and the Rise of European Living Standards after 1492

SSRN Electronic Journal 01/2009; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1402322
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT Did living standards stagnate before the Industrial Revolution? Traditional real-wage indices typically show broadly constant living standards before 1800. In this paper, we show that living standards rose substantially, but surreptitiously because of the growing availability of new goods. Colonial luxuries such as tea, coffee, and sugar transformed European diets after the discovery of America and the rounding of the Cape of Good Hope. These goods became household items in many countries by the end of the 18th century. We use the Greenwood-Kopecky (2009) method to calculate welfare gains based on data about price changes and the rate of adoption of new colonial goods. Our results suggest that by 1850, the average Englishman would have been willing to forego 15% or more of his income in order to maintain access to sugar and tea alone. These findings are robust to a wide range of alternative assumptions, data series, and valuation methods.

0 Followers
 · 
105 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The welfare gain to consumers from the introduction of personal computers (PCs) is estimated. A simple model of consumer demand is formulated that uses a slightly modified version of standard preferences. The modification permits marginal utility, and hence total utility, to be finite when the consumption of computers is zero. This implies that the good will not be consumed at a high enough price. It also bounds the consumer surplus derived from the product. The model is calibrated/estimated using standard national income and product account data. The welfare gain from the introduction of PCs is 2%–3% of consumption expenditure. (JEL E01, E21, O33, O47)
    Economic Inquiry 01/2013; 51(1). DOI:10.1111/j.1465-7295.2011.00447.x · 0.98 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Motivated by the basic adage that man does not live by bread alone, we offer a theory of historical economic growth and demographic transition where human beings need food to survive, but enjoy other things, too. We show using our model that technology change is sufficient for explaining historical consumption patterns and population dynamics, including both the Neolithic and the Industrial Revolutions. Our theory stands in contrast to a vast literature where “Malthusian” models are derived to match the assumption that differences in living standards across time and space prior to the Industrial Revolution were negligible. We show that stagnation is a poor approximation of historical growth patterns and argue that theories based on it are therefore wrong.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article considers an example of the impact of a new good on producers of close substitutes: the invention of margarine and its rapid introduction into the British market from the mid-1870s. This presented a challenge to the traditional suppliers of that market, butter producers from different European countries. We argue that the capacity to react quickly to the appearance of this cheap substitute by improving quality and establishing product differentiation was critical for the fortunes of butter producers. This is illustrated by a discussion of the different reactions to margarine and quality upgrading in Ireland, Denmark, and the Netherlands. A statistical analysis using monthly data for Britain from 1881–7 confirms that margarine had a greater impact on the price of poor quality butter than that of high quality butter, presumably because it was a stronger substitute.
    The Economic History Review 04/2014; 67(3). DOI:10.1111/1468-0289.12046 · 0.78 Impact Factor

Preview (2 Sources)

Download
0 Downloads
Available from