Article

Housing wealth or economic climate: Why do house prices matter for well-being?

Department of Economics, University of Bristol, UK, The Centre for Market and Public Organisation 01/2010;
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This study investigates whether and why house prices matter for well-being. House prices may influence well-being via a wealth/access-to-credit mechanism, as a rise in prices increases housing wealth and the collateral value of a house, and via a relative concerns mechanism, if renters compare themselves to homeowners and vice versa. Alternatively, any correlation between house prices and well-being may simply reflect broader economic conditions rather than a causal effect. Using local area house price data, this study distinguishes between these alternative explanations by comparing the correlation between local house prices and well-being for homeowners and renters. A small positive correlation between house prices and well-being exists for both homeowners and renters, indicating the absence of a wealth/credit mechanism or relative concerns mechanism. This correlation cannot be explained by economic variables such as local unemployment, earnings or earnings expectations, hinting at a purely psychological phenomenon.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
57 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Two competing explanations of the UK consumer boom in the late 1980s are the financial liberalisation-imperfect housing market hypothesis of Muellbauer and Murphy and the expectations hypothesis of King. We use 15 years of Family Expenditure Surveys, and cohort analysis, to investigate to what extent these two hypotheses agree with observed changes in consumption patterns. We find that the housing markets explanation accounts for much of the increase by older cohorts, but cannot be reconciled with the marked rise in expenditure levels of younger households. A simple simulation exercise shows instead that the expectations hypothesis can generate increases of expenditure by young consumers of the magnitude observed in our data.
    Attanasio, O. and Weber, G. (1994) The UK consumption boom of the late 1980s: aggregate implications of microeconomic evidence. The Economic Journal, 104 (427). pp. 1269-1302. ISSN 00130133.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this paper we investigate how life satisfaction (or happiness) is affected by a substantial increase in real income. Our context is East Germany in the decade following reunification, and we implement a new fixed-effect estimator for ordinal life satisfaction and develop a decomposition approach that accounts for new entrants and panel attrition. Using data from the German Socio-Economic Panel we find that average life satisfaction in East Germany increased by around 20% between 1991 and 2001, leading to a clear convergence with West Germany. Importantly, increased real household incomes in East Germany accounted for around 35-40% of this increase, which corresponds to the economists' view that money surely matters.
    American Economic Review 02/2004; 94(3):730-740. · 2.69 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper addresses the question of when and to what extent individuals are aected by major positive and negative life events, including changes in …nancial situation, marital status, death of child or spouse and being a victim of crime. The key advantage of our data is that we are able to identify these events on a quarterly basis rather than on the yearly basis used by previous studies. We …nd evidence that life events are not randomly distributed, that individuals to a large extent anticipate major events and that they quickly adapt. These eects have important implications for the calculation of monetary values needed to compensate individuals for life events such as crime or death of spouse. We …nd that our new valuation methodology that incorporates these dynamic factors produces considerably smaller compensation valuations than those calculated using the standard approach. For example, the loss of a partner, which is the most expensive shock, is o¤-set by a windfall income gain of about $200,000, which is less than half the compensation value using the standard approach.

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from