Article

House Price Volatility and the Housing Ladder

SSRN Electronic Journal 01/2010; DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.1680657
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper investigates the effects of housing price risk on housing choices over the life-cycle. Housing price risk can be substantial but, unlike other risky assets which people can avoid, the fact that most people will eventually own their home creates an insurance demand for housing assets early in life. Our contribution is to focus on the importance of home ownership and housing wealth as a hedge against future house price risk for individuals moving up the ladder – people living in places with higher housing price risk should own their first home at a younger age, should live in larger homes, and should be less likely to refinance. These predictions are tested and shown to hold using panel data from the United States and Great Britain.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Richard Blundell, Sep 05, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
106 Views
 · 
74 Downloads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Are households more likely to be homeowners when "housing risk" is higher? We show that homeownership rates and loan-to-value (LTV) ratios at the city level are strongly nega-tively correlated with local house price volatility. However, causal inference is confounded by house price levels, which are systematically correlated with housing risk in an intuitive way: in cities where the land value is larger relative to the local cost of structures, house prices are higher and more volatile. We confirm this using instruments based on topographic measures. We disentangle the contributions of high price levels from high volatilities by building a life-cycle model of homeownership choices. The model is able to explain much of the cross-city dispersion in homeownership and LTV. We find that higher price levels explain the lower home-ownership, while higher risk explains the lower LTV in high land value cities. The relationship between LTV and risk highlights the importance of including other means of incomplete insur-ance in models of homeownership. Finally, we use the model to show why regression-based inferences about the effect of risk on homeownership are biased.
    Quantitative Economics 12/2011; 5(3). DOI:10.3982/QE346
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In a Bewley model with endogenous price volatility, home ownership and mobility across locations and jobs, we assess the contribution of financial constraints, housing illiquidities and house price risk to home ownership over the life cycle. The model can explain the rise in home ownership and fall in mobility over the life cycle. While some households rent due to borrowing constraints in the mortgage market, factors that affect propensities to save and move, such as risky house values and transactions costs, are equally important determinants of the ownership rate.
    Review of Economic Dynamics 01/2013; 17(2). DOI:10.1016/j.red.2013.06.002 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We use life history data covering households in 13 European countries to analyse residential moves past the age of 50. We observe four types of moves: renting to owning, owning to renting, trading up or trading down for homeowners. We find that in the younger group (aged 50–64), trading up and purchase decisions prevail; in the older group (65+), trading down and selling are more common. Overall, moves are rare, particularly in countries characterised by high transaction costs. Most moves are driven by changes in household composition (divorce, widowhood, nest leaving by children), but economic factors play a role: low-income households who are house-rich and cash-poor are more likely to sell their home late in life.
    Journal of Population Economics 07/2014; 27(3):797-823. DOI:10.1007/s00148-013-0477-5 · 0.92 Impact Factor