A Cluster-Randomized Trial of a Primary Care Informatics-Based System for Breast Cancer Screening

General Medicine Division, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 02/2011; 26(2):154-61. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1500-0
Source: PubMed


Information technology offers the promise, as yet unfulfilled, of delivering efficient, evidence-based health care.
To evaluate whether a primary care network-based informatics intervention can improve breast cancer screening rates.
Cluster-randomized controlled trial of 12 primary care practices conducted from March 20, 2007 to March 19, 2008.
Women 42-69 years old with no record of a mammogram in the prior 2 years.
In intervention practices, a population-based informatics system was implemented that: connected overdue patients to appropriate care providers, presented providers with a Web-based list of their overdue patients in a non-visit-based setting, and enabled "one-click" mammography ordering or documented deferral reasons. Patients selected for mammography received automatically generated letters and follow-up phone calls. All practices had electronic health record reminders about breast cancer screening available during clinical encounters.
The primary outcome was the proportion of overdue women undergoing mammography at 1-year follow-up.
Baseline mammography rates in intervention and control practices did not differ (79.5% vs 79.3%, p = 0.73). Among 3,054 women in intervention practices and 3,676 women in control practices overdue for mammograms, intervention patients were somewhat younger, more likely to be non-Hispanic white, and have health insurance. Most intervention providers used the system (65 of 70 providers, 92.9%). Action was taken for 2,652 (86.8%) intervention patients [2,274 (74.5%) contacted and 378 (12.4%) deferred]. After 1 year, mammography rates were significantly higher in the intervention arm (31.4% vs 23.3% in control arm, p < 0.001 after adjustment for baseline differences; 8.1% absolute difference, 95% CI 5.1-11.2%). All demographic subgroups benefited from the intervention. Intervention patients completed screening sooner than control patients (p < 0.001).
A novel population-based informatics system functioning as part of a non-visit-based care model increased mammography screening rates in intervention practices.
ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT00462891.

Download full-text


Available from: William Lester, Oct 28, 2014
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We consider a method for signal detection given a small number of data samples, such as in the case of tracking moving sources. By employing a linear transformation, we map the full dimension sensor space data onto a lower dimension space (beamspace) to lower the computation complexity and enhance the signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR). The SINR of the beamspace MVDR beamformer is compared with that of diagonally loaded MVDR. Analysis and simulation show that the beamspace MVDR has better performance when the number of data samples is small.
    Signals, Systems and Computers, 2002. Conference Record of the Thirty-Sixth Asilomar Conference on; 12/2002
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The design and analysis of cluster randomized trials can require more sophistication than individually randomized trials. However, the need for statistical methods that account for the clustered design has not always been appreciated, and past reviews have found widespread deficiencies in methodology and reporting. We reviewed cluster randomized trials of cancer screening interventions published in 1995-2010 to determine whether the use of appropriate statistical methods had increased over time. Literature searches yielded 50 articles reporting outcome analyses of cluster randomized trials of breast, cervix and colorectal cancer screening interventions. Of studies published in 1995-1999, 2000-2002, 2003-2006 and 2007-2010, 55% (6/11), 82% (9/11), 92% (12/13) and 60% (9/15) used appropriate analytic methods, respectively. Results were suggestive of a peak in 2003-2006 (p =.06) followed by a decline in 2007-2010 (p =.08). While the sample of studies was small, these results indicate that many cluster randomized trials of cancer screening interventions have had deficiencies in the application of correct statistical procedures for the outcome analysis, and that increased adoption of appropriate methods in the early and mid-2000's may not have been sustained.
    Contemporary clinical trials 03/2011; 32(4):477-84. DOI:10.1016/j.cct.2011.03.001 · 1.94 Impact Factor

  • Breast Diseases A Year Book Quarterly 12/2011; 22(4):376–377. DOI:10.1016/j.breastdis.2011.10.035
Show more