Article

Nanotechnology in ophthalmology. Can J Ophthalmol

Institute of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, New Jersey Medical School, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, NJ 07103, USA.
Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology (Impact Factor: 1.3). 10/2010; 45(5):457-76. DOI: 10.3129/i10-090
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Nanotechnology involves the creation and use of materials and devices at the size scale of intracellular structures and molecules, and involves systems and constructs in the order of <100 nm. The aim of nanomedicine is the comprehensive monitoring, control, construction, repair, defence, and improvement of human biological systems at the molecular level, using engineered nanodevices and nanostructures that operate massively in parallel at the single-cell level, ultimately to achieve medical benefit. In this review we consider general principles of nanotechnology as applied to nanomedicine (e.g., biomimicry and pseudointelligence). Some applications of nanotechnology to ophthalmology are described (including treatment of oxidative stress; measurement of intraocular pressure; theragnostics; use of nanoparticles to treat choroidal new vessels, prevent scarring after glaucoma surgery, and treat retinal degenerative disease with gene therapy; prosthetics; and regenerative nanomedicine). Nanotechnology will revolutionize our approach to current therapeutic challenges (e.g., drug delivery, postoperative scarring) and will enable us to address currently unsolvable problems (e.g., sight-restoring therapy for patients with retinal degenerative disease). Obstacles to the incorporation of nanotechnology remain, such as safe manufacturing techniques and unintended biological consequences of nanomaterial use. These obstacles are not insurmountable, and revolutionary treatments for ophthalmic diseases are expected to result from this burgeoning field.

4 Followers
 · 
695 Views
  • Source
    • "More recently, nanotechnology applications have been directed also towards retinal diseases, including the development of nanoparticles capable of delivering genes and neuroprotective molecules (reviewed in Ref. [26]) as well as the fabrication of scaffolds with nanoscale topographies for the intraocular delivery of cells [27]. Another treatment modality being tested to treat retinal degenerations involves the use of sub or epiretinal implants [26] [28] [29], a field where nanocomponents have a great potential, in particular those that allow a good control of their surface topography. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We have established long-term cultures of postnatal retinal cells on arrays of gallium phosphide nanowires of different geometries. Rod and cone photoreceptors, ganglion cells and bipolar cells survived on the substrates for at least 18 days in vitro. Glial cells were also observed, but these did not overgrow the neuronal population. On nanowires, neurons extended numerous long and branched neurites that expressed the synaptic vesicle marker synaptophysin. The longest nanowires (4 μm long) allowed a greater attachment and neurite elongation and our analysis suggests that the length of the nanowire per se and/or the adsorption of biomolecules on the nanowires may have been important factors regulating the observed cell behavior. The study thus shows that CNS neurons are amenable to gallium phosphide nanowires, probably as they create conditions that more closely resemble those encountered in the in vivo environment. These findings suggest that gallium phosphide nanowires may be considered as a material of interest when improving existing or designing the next generation of implantable devices. The features of gallium phosphide nanowires can be precisely controlled, making them suitable for this purpose.
    Biomaterials 11/2012; 34(4). DOI:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.10.042 · 8.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There have been considerable advances in the field of nanotechnology-based biosensors and diagnostics (NBBD) during the last two decades. These include the production of nanomaterials (NMs), employing them for new biosensing and diagnostic applications, their extensive characterization for in vitro and in vivo applications, and toxicity analysis. All these developments have led to tremendous technology push and successful demonstrations of several promising NBBD. However, there has been a significant lag in their commercialization, especially due to the lack of international regulatory guidelines for evaluating the safety of NMs and the growing public concerns about their toxicity. Despite these numerous advances and the recent regulatory approval of several NMs, it still remains to be seen if NBBD are superior to conventional ones (not based on NMs), reliable, reproducible, cost effective, and robust enough to meet the requirements of industries and healthcare. This manuscript provides a critical review of NBBD, the technology push, and the industrial/healthcare requirements.
    09/2012; 2(3). DOI:10.1007/s12668-012-0047-4
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Genetic eye diseases (GEDs) are clinically and genetically heterogeneous. Results from molecular genetic testing are redefining the etiology and clinical spectrum of these heritable diseases, helping to explain the observed overlap in clinical phenotypes. Patients and parents benefit from DNA analysis when results confirm a diagnosis or make a diagnosis more specific. Accurate counseling can then be provided regarding the prognosis, presymptomatic diagnosis, life and family-planning issues and whether to anticipate other ocular or systemic medical problems. Patients hope that mutation identification will enable their participation in future clinical trials for treatment. Requests for molecular testing are increasing while those in the visually impaired world and the healthcare professionals who manage them wait to learn long-term results of the first human clinical trials for a GED to be treated with gene therapy, RPE65-type Leber congenital amaurosis. The advantages and disadvantages of molecular testing for ocular diseases are discussed in general, followed by specific details for over 40 GEDs. Some cases are presented to demonstrate testing issues.
    Expert Review of Ophthalmology 03/2011; 6(2):221-245. DOI:10.1586/eop.11.2
Show more