Inter- and intraobserver variation in the histopathological evaluation of early oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Department of Surgery, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Journal of clinical pathology (Impact Factor: 2.92). 11/2010; 63(11):978-81. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2010.080721
Source: PubMed


According to the classification established by the Japanese Society for Oesophageal Disease, early oesophageal cancer can be subdivided into six successive layers of the mucosa or submucosa, which influences the treatment strategy and prognosis of the individual patient. However, the reproducibility of this classification in terms of inter- and intraobserver variability is unclear.
Histological slides from 105 surgical resection specimens of patients who had undergone oesophagectomy for early oesophageal adenocarcinoma were reviewed independently by three gastrointestinal pathologists, and were classified according to the Japanese criteria (m1/m2/m3/sm1/sm2/sm3 tumours). Inter- and intraobserver variation was determined by κ-statistics.
The interobserver reproducibility was good between pathologist 1 and 2 (κ=0.61, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.67), and moderate between pathologist 1 and 3 (κ=0.51, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.57) and between pathologist 2 and 3 (κ=0.50, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.61). The intraobserver agreement as assessed by the expert pathologist was good (κ=0.76), with a 95% CI that was interpreted as good to very good (0.67 to 0.85). Most agreement was achieved at the lower (m1) and upper site (sm2, sm3) of the spectrum, whereas the m2 tumours reflected the most discrepant stage. The majority of the observed discrepancy included the variation in one substage only.
The reproducibility of the Japanese classification is good in terms of inter- and intraobserver variability when grading early oesophageal adenocarcinoma on surgical resection specimens. The present data confirm that dedicated gastrointestinal pathologists with broad experience are preferred when grading the resection specimens of patients with early oesophageal adenocarcinoma.

4 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To identify differences in survival of patients with pT1 esophageal cancer relating to depth of wall infiltration. Histologic analysis of mucosal and submucosal infiltration in thirds has shown an increasing rate of lymph node metastases (LNM) according to the depth of wall infiltration in pT1 esophageal cancer. One hundred seventy-one patients had transthoracic en bloc (n = 161) or transhiatal esophagectomy (n = 10) for pT1 esophageal cancer [121 adenocarcinomas (AC), 50 squamous cell carcinomas (SCC)]. The histologic analysis of the specimen comprised depth of wall penetration of the carcinoma in thirds of pT1a = mucosa (m1, m2, m3) or pT1b = submucosa (sm1, sm2, sm3) and number and infiltration of the resected lymph nodes. The rate of LNM was 0% for 70 mucosal carcinomas and 34% for 101 submucosal carcinomas (P = 0.001). For sm1, this rate was 13%, for sm2 19% and for sm3 56%. The 5-year survival rate (5Y-SR) was 82% for pN0 and 45% for pN+ patients (P < 0.001). There was no significant prognostic difference between AC and SCC (5Y-SR: 74% vs 71%). The 5Y-SR of the pT1a group was 87% compared with 66% for pT1b (P = 0.046). The 5-year survival rate for sm1 and sm2 were similar; sm1 + sm2 were together significantly better (80%) than sm3 (46%) (P = 0.008). In multivariate analysis, only sm3 was an independent prognostic factor (P = 0.01). After esophagectomy, the prognosis of patients with sm1/sm2 infiltration is as good as for patients with mucosal carcinoma. Sm3 infiltration is the worst prognostic factor in pT1 esophageal cancer.
    Annals of surgery 11/2011; 254(5):802-7; discussion 807-8. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182369128 · 8.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Context: Central pathology review (CPR) was initially designed as a quality control measure. The potential of CPR in clinical trials was recognized as early as in the 1960s and quickly became embedded as an integral part of many clinical trials since. Objective: To review the current experience with CPR in clinical trials, to summarize current developments in virtual microscopy, and to discuss the potential advantages and disadvantages of this technology in the context of CPR. Data sources: A PubMed (US National Library of Medicine) search for published studies was conducted, and the relevant articles were reviewed, accompanied by the authors' experience at their practicing institution. Conclusions: The review of the available literature strongly suggests the growing importance of CPR both in the clinical trial setting as well as in second opinion cases. However, the currently applied approach significantly impedes efficient transfer of slides and patient data. Recent advances in imaging, digital microscopy, and Internet technologies suggest that the CPR process may be dramatically streamlined in the foreseeable future to allow for better diagnosis and quality assurance than ever before. In particular, whole slide imaging may play an important role in this process and result in a substantial reduction of the overall turnaround time required for slide review at the central location. Above all, this new approach may benefit the large clinical trials organized by oncology cooperative groups, since most of those trials involve complicated logistics owing to enrollment of large number of patients at several remotely located participating institutions.
    Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine 04/2013; 137(4):492-5. DOI:10.5858/arpa.2012-0093-RA · 2.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Endoscopic resection is an organ-sparing option for early esophageal adenocarcinoma, but should be used only in patients with a negligible risk of lymph node metastases (LNM). The objective was to develop a simple scoring system to predict LNM in T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma. Study design: All primary esophagectomies performed for T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma without neoadjuvant therapy at 5 university institutions from 2000 to 2011 were analyzed. Patient and pathologic characteristics were compared between patients with LNM at the time of surgical resection and those without. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to establish a simple scoring system that estimated the risk of LNM, using variables from the final surgical pathology. Results: A total of 258 patients were included for analysis (mean age 65.2 years [SD 10.3 years], 88% male). The incidence of LNM was 7% (9 of 122) for T1a and 26% (35 of 136) for T1b. Tumor size (odds ratio [OR] 1.35 per cm, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.71) and lymphovascular invasion (OR 7.50, 95% CI 3.30 to 17.07) were the strongest independent predictors of LNM. A weighted scoring system was devised from the final multivariate model and included size (+1 point per cm), depth of invasion (+2 for T1b), differentiation (+3 for each step of dedifferentiation), and lymphovascular invasion (+6 if present). Total number of points estimated the probability of LNM (low risk [0 to 1 point], ≤ 2%; moderate risk [2 to 4 points], 3% to 6%; and high risk [5+ points], ≥ 7%). Conclusions: We devised a simple scoring system that accurately estimates the risk of LNM to aid in decision-making in patients with T1 esophageal adenocarcinoma undergoing endoscopic resection.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 05/2013; 217(2). DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.03.015 · 5.12 Impact Factor
Show more

Similar Publications