Article

Risk analysis for hospital mortality in patients with acute type a aortic dissection.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fujisawa City Hospital, Fujisawa-city, Kanagawa, Japan.
The Annals of thoracic surgery (Impact Factor: 3.45). 10/2010; 90(4):1246-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.05.069
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Stanford type A acute aortic dissection is a fatal condition requiring emergency surgery. This study was designed to evaluate risk factors for hospital mortality in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection.
We studied consecutive 301 patients (163 men and 138 women; mean age, 63.3 years) who underwent emergency surgery for Stanford type A acute aortic dissection from January 1997 through December 2007. The subjects were divided into two groups: patients who were discharged from the hospital, and those who died during hospitalization. Preoperative and operative clinical factors were compared between the groups.
Overall, 41 patients (13.6%) died during hospitalization. On univariate analysis, significant preoperative risk factors for hospital mortality were cardiopulmonary resuscitation, coagulopathy, renal dysfunction, elevated aspartate aminotransferase levels, myocardial ischemia, and lower-extremity ischemia. As for factors related to surgery, the duration of operation, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp time, and volume of blood transfusion were greater among patients who died during hospitalization than in those who were discharged from the hospital. On multivariate analysis, independent preoperative risk factors were cardiopulmonary resuscitation, renal dysfunction, and lower-extremity ischemia. Shock or cardiac tamponade were not risk factors.
Risk factors for hospital mortality in patients with Stanford type A acute aortic dissection were cardiopulmonary resuscitation, renal dysfunction, and lower-extremity ischemia.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
108 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and Aim of the StudyThe risk factors associated with death in complicated Stanford B acute aortic dissection (AAD) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) are poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the early and late events and mortality of complicated Stanford B AAD associated with TEVAR.Methods Sixty-two patients with complicated Stanford B AAD undergoing TEVAR were included in this study.ResultsPrimary technical success of TEVAR was achieved in 61 (98.39%) cases. The early mortality rate was 9.68%. Procedural type I endoleak (p = 0.007, OR = 7.71, 95% CI: 1.75–34.01) and cardiac tamponade (p = 0.010, OR = 8.86, 95% CI: 1.70–4 6.14) were the significant predictors of early death in the multivariate model. The late mortality was 16.07%. Cox regression analysis revealed rupture of false lumen (p = 0.001, hazard ratio = 21.96, 95% CI: 3.02–82.12), postoperative myocardial infarction (p = 0.001, hazard ratio = 9.86, 95% CI: 2.12–39.64), and acute renal failure (p = 0.024, hazard ratio = 3.98, 95% CI: 1.26–12.11) to be independent risk factors of late mortality.Conclusions Type I procedural endoleak and cardiac tamponade were the significant predictors of early death in patients of complicated Stanford B AAD undergoing TEVAR. Rupture of false lumen, postoperative myocardial infarction, and acute renal failure were the independent risk factors for late death after TEVAR.
    Journal of Cardiac Surgery 05/2014; · 1.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are few data concerning the impact of preoperative renal function, assessed using estimated glomerular filtration rate, on surgical outcomes following acute type A aortic dissection. We investigated the accuracy of estimated glomerular filtration rate (in ml/min/1.73 m(2)) in predicting in-hospital mortality and postoperative renal replacement therapy in such cases. We reviewed 114 consecutive patients with non-dialysis-dependent renal dysfunction who underwent thoracic aortic surgery for acute type A aortic dissection between 1997 and 2012. Preoperative renal function was categorized as normal (estimated glomerular filtration rate >90; n = 15) or as mild (60-89; n = 39), moderate I (45-59; n = 39), moderate II (30-44; n = 14) or severe (15-29; n = 7) renal dysfunction. In-hospital mortality was 14.9%. Eighteen (15.8%) of 114 patients required renal replacement therapy. A more severe stage stratified by preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate levels could effectively predict postoperative renal replacement therapy (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.786). The best cut-off value of estimated glomerular filtration rate for predicting postoperative renal replacement therapy was 60 (sensitivity 95%, specificity 59%). On multiple regression analysis, the independent preoperative and intraoperative risk factors for postoperative renal replacement therapy were estimated glomerular filtration rate (P < 0.0001), coronary ischaemic time (P < 0.01) and total arch replacement (P < 0.01). Cardiopulmonary bypass time was the sole independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality (P < 0.001). On the other hand, among the morbidities, stroke [odds ratio (OR), 8.68; P < 0.01] and postoperative renal replacement therapy (OR, 5.47; P < 0.01) were independent risk factors of in-hospital mortality, according to multiple logistic regression analysis. Preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate can effectively predict the need for renal replacement therapy after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection. However, it is not an effective diagnostic tool to predict in-hospital mortality. The complexity of the characteristics of patients who undergo surgical procedures may make prediction of surgical outcomes difficult. Risk models to predict hospital mortality and morbidities are needed to assist clinicians in determining the optimal treatment. © The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.
    Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 12/2014; · 1.11 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The malperfusion syndrome associated with acute aortic dissection draws attention because the clinical picture is very dramatic, and patients with malperfusion have poorer clinical outcomes. To improve surgical outcomes, the ischemic damages associated with organ malperfusion should be minimized by restoring perfusion as early as possible, which occasionally can hardly coexist with central repair. This paper reviews the current evidence, problems, and dilemma related to the diagnosis and treatment of the malperfusion syndrome caused by acute type A aortic dissection.
    General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery 04/2014;