An Analysis of Public Health Policy and Legal Issues Relevant to Mobile Food Vending

Department of Preventive Cardiology, Children's Hospital and Research Center Oakland, Oakland, CA 94609, USA.
American Journal of Public Health (Impact Factor: 4.23). 11/2010; 100(11):2038-46. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.185892
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Mobile food vending is a component of the food environment that has received little attention in the public health literature beyond concerns about food sanitation and hygiene issues. However, several features of mobile food vending make it an intriguing venue for food access. We present key components of mobile vending regulation and provide examples from 12 US cities to illustrate the variation that can exist surrounding these regulations. Using these regulatory features as a framework, we highlight existing examples of "healthy vending policies" to describe how mobile food vending can be used to increase access to nutritious food for vulnerable populations.

Download full-text


Available from: June M Tester, Jul 05, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This review summarizes several avenues of planning inquiry into food systems research, revealing gaps in the literature, allied fields of study and mismatches between scholarly disciplines and the food system life cycle. Planners and scholars in associated fields have identified and defined problems in the food system as 'wicked' problems, complex environmental issues that require systemic solutions at the community scale. While food justice scholars have contextualized problem areas, planning scholars have made a broad case for planning involvement in solving these wicked problems while ensuring that the functional and beneficial parts of the food system continue to thrive. This review maps the entry points of scholarly interest in food systems and planning's contributions to its study, charting a research agenda for the future.
    International Planning Studies 04/2013; 18(2):243-266. DOI:10.1080/13563475.2013.774150
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The environments where people live, learn, work and play have a profound influence on health. Policies affecting physical activity, access to healthy foods, and the prevalence of tobacco products in our neighbourhoods can either promote or discourage behaviour associated with cancer and other chronic diseases. Given the regulatory landscape in the USA, where federal law controls venues with the widest possible scope (such as television and the Internet), states and cities have tremendous latitude in regulating the physical environments that residents experience every day. This paper explores innovative and meaningful ways to improve public health through policy initiatives targeted specifically at places such as homes and neighbourhoods, schools, shops, restaurants, bars and recreational areas.
    Public health 09/2011; 125(12):889-95. DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2011.04.010 · 1.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: On my first day of law school, I was introduced to the law of contracts, and the law of torts. In five years of lectures, however, not once did I come across the “law of obesity prevention”. Hitherto, preventing obesity has never been considered part of the role of law or lawyers. Lawyers have never been called on to defend the role of law in obesity prevention, or to identify the content of a package of legal interventions having that goal.Nevertheless, steadily rising rates of overweight and obesity among adults and children in Australia and elsewhere are fueling debate about the most effective and appropriate strategies for obesity prevention. This chapter defends a role for law in policy efforts to prevent obesity and to improve nutrition at the population level. Rather than targeting individuals and seeking to directly influence their dietary choices and patterns of physical activity, I argue that the best opportunities for law lie in improving the environment in order to support healthier choices and to reduce exposure to the wide range of factors that have made weight gain increasingly common. Secondly, this chapter presents four Australian case studies, with comparisons from the United States and Britain, to illustrate the variety of priority interventions that could take legal form.