Uncertainties in climate change projections and regional downscaling: implications for water resources management

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (Impact Factor: 3.64). 01/2010; DOI: 10.5194/hessd-7-1821-2010
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT Climate change is expected to have a large impact on water resources worldwide. A major problem in assessing the potential impact of a changing climate on these resources is the difference in spatial scale between available climate change projections and water resources management. Regional climate models (RCMs) are often used for the spatial disaggregation of the outputs of global circulation models. However, RCMs are time-intensive to run and typically only a small number of model runs is available for a certain region of interest. This paper investigates the value of the improved representation of local climate processes by a regional climate model for water resources management in the tropical Andes of Ecuador. This region has a complex hydrology and its water resources are under pressure. Compared to the IPCC AR4 model ensemble, the regional climate model PRECIS does indeed capture local gradients better than global models, but locally the model is prone to large discrepancies between observed and modelled precipitation. It is concluded that a further increase in resolution is necessary to represent local gradients properly. Furthermore, to assess the uncertainty in downscaling, an ensemble of regional climate models should be implemented. Finally, translating the climate variables to streamflow using a hydrological model constitutes a smaller but not negligible source of uncertainty.


Available from: Rolando Célleri, May 28, 2015
1 Follower
  • Source
    Chapter: Urban areas
    01/2014: pages 535-612; Cambridge University Press.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Glaciers store water over a range of temporal scales with important implications for downstream human and natural systems. Assessment of the contribution of glacial meltwater runoff to total watershed discharge is an essential part of climate change risk assessment and sustainable water management in glacierized watersheds. Over the past decade, a range of techniques for quantifying the proportional contribution of glacial meltwater has been presented in the scientific literature. Here we examine five different methodological approaches: direct discharge measurement, glaciological approaches, hydrological balance equations, hydrochemical tracers, and hydrological modeling. After a brief summary of the role of glaciers in watershed hydrology, we evaluate each approach, with regard to their respective data requirements, assumptions, and associated uncertainties. Next, we discuss factors that researchers must consider in deciding upon a particular methodological approach, then conclude with a discussion of future research needs. We underscore the need for expanded meteorological, hydrological, and glaciological monitoring networks in glacierized watersheds worldwide, for more comprehensive assessment of uncertainty and for better integration of research with the specific needs of watershed stakeholders.
    Progress in Physical Geography 01/2014; 38(2):173. DOI:10.1177/0309133313516161 · 3.89 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Uncertainties associated with General Circulation Models (GCMs) and the downscaling methods used for regional or local scale hydrological modelling can result in substantial differences in estimates of future water resources availability. This paper assesses the skill of nine statistically downscaled GCMs in reproducing historical climate for 15 catchments in five regions of South Africa. The identification of skilled GCMs may reduce the uncertainty in future predictions and the focus is on rainfall skill as the GCMs show very similar patterns of change in temperature. The skill tests were designed to assess whether the GCMs are able to realistically reproduce precipitation distribution statistics and patterns of seasonality, persistence and extremes. Some models are consistently less skilful for the regions assessed, while some are generally more skilful with some regionally specific exceptions. There are differences in the GCMs skill across the different regions and in the skill ranking between coastal areas and inland regions. However, only a limited reduction in uncertainty is achieved when using only the downscaled GCM outputs identified as being skilled in a hydrological model for one of the regions. Further modelling studies are required to determine the general applicability of this observation.
    Hydrology Research 02/2014; 45(1):134. DOI:10.2166/nh.2013.027 · 1.94 Impact Factor