Gingival Fibroblasts as a Promising Source of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

University of Colorado, Boulder, United States of America
PLoS ONE (Impact Factor: 3.23). 09/2010; 5(9):e12743. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012743
Source: PubMed


Induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells efficiently generated from accessible tissues have the potential for clinical applications. Oral gingiva, which is often resected during general dental treatments and treated as biomedical waste, is an easily obtainable tissue, and cells can be isolated from patients with minimal discomfort.
We herein demonstrate iPS cell generation from adult wild-type mouse gingival fibroblasts (GFs) via introduction of four factors (Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4 and c-Myc; GF-iPS-4F cells) or three factors (the same as GF-iPS-4F cells, but without the c-Myc oncogene; GF-iPS-3F cells) without drug selection. iPS cells were also generated from primary human gingival fibroblasts via four-factor transduction. These cells exhibited the morphology and growth properties of embryonic stem (ES) cells and expressed ES cell marker genes, with a decreased CpG methylation ratio in promoter regions of Nanog and Oct3/4. Additionally, teratoma formation assays showed ES cell-like derivation of cells and tissues representative of all three germ layers. In comparison to mouse GF-iPS-4F cells, GF-iPS-3F cells showed consistently more ES cell-like characteristics in terms of DNA methylation status and gene expression, although the reprogramming process was substantially delayed and the overall efficiency was also reduced. When transplanted into blastocysts, GF-iPS-3F cells gave rise to chimeras and contributed to the development of the germline. Notably, the four-factor reprogramming efficiency of mouse GFs was more than 7-fold higher than that of fibroblasts from tail-tips, possibly because of their high proliferative capacity.
These results suggest that GFs from the easily obtainable gingival tissues can be readily reprogrammed into iPS cells, thus making them a promising cell source for investigating the basis of cellular reprogramming and pluripotency for future clinical applications. In addition, high-quality iPS cells were generated from mouse GFs without Myc transduction or a specific system for reprogrammed cell selection.

Download full-text


Available from: Hiroshi Egusa, Jul 05, 2014
  • Source
    • "); gingival tissue (Egusa et al. 2010; Wada et al. 2011); and PDL stem cells (Wada et al. 2011). A comparison performed by Yan et al. (2010) identified that the reprogramming efficiency appeared to be greater from dental-derived tissues than human fibroblast cells. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are the newest member of a growing list of stem cell populations that hold great potential for use in cell-based treatment approaches in the dental field. This review summarizes the dental tissues that have successfully been utilized to generate iPSC lines, as well as the potential uses of iPSCs for tissue regeneration in different dental applications. While iPSCs display great promise in a number of dental applications, there are safety concerns with these cells that need to be addressed before they can be used in clinical settings. This review outlines some of the apprehensions to the use of iPSCs clinically, and it details approaches that are being employed to ensure the safety and efficacy of these cells. One of the major approaches being investigated is the differentiation of iPSCs prior to use in patients. iPSCs have successfully been differentiated into a wide range of cells and tissue types. This review focuses on 2 differentiation approaches-the differentiation of iPSCs into mesenchymal stem cells and the differentiation of iPSCs into osteoprogenitor cells. Both these resulting populations of cells are particularly relevant to the dental field. © International & American Associations for Dental Research 2015.
    Journal of dental research 08/2015; DOI:10.1177/0022034515599769 · 4.14 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Very recently, the in vivo efficacy of utilizing GMSCs in bone regeneration was demonstrated in a mandibular defect as well as a critical-sized calvarial defect model in rats [53]. Furthermore, these cells gave rise to high-quality iPS cells, which suggests that gingival tissue is also a promising cell source for investigating the basis of cellular reprogramming and pluripotency for future clinical applications [54]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Periodontitis leading to the progressive destruction of tooth-supporting tissues (including periodontal ligament, alveolar bone and cementum) is the major cause of tooth loss in adults. Currently available therapies for periodontal morbidities are clearly inadequate, with significant limitations in the predictable regeneration of the multiple lost/damaged periodontal tissues and the reconstruction of their complex structures. Recent scientific advances, however, have facilitated the identification of a wide variety of stem cells that may serve as novel ‘tools’ for cellular replenishment and tissue regeneration. Meanwhile, great progress has been made in developing biomaterials to support transplanted cells and to act as templates for the growth of new tissue. Furthermore, these biomaterials are routinely being designed to display and deliver regulatory signals in a precise and near-physiological fashion, which may orchestrate wound healing and regeneration. The concept of tissue engineering has been integrated into research and applications which attempt to regenerate the damaged periodontium by selective combination of stem cells, growth factors and such materials systems. This chapter provides an overview of the components involved in the established and proposed periodontal bioengineering strategies. Certain fundamental issues and design endeavors in relation to the cell-free and cell-based approaches that are being actively pursued to address specific demands are evaluated and illustrated. Future development highlights the importance of translational research to create a clinically feasible treatment regimen that may improve health care for patients.
    Principles of Tissue Engineering, Fourth edition 2014 edited by Robert Lanza, Robert Langer, Joseph Vacanti, 06/2014: chapter Periodontal Tissue Engineering: pages 1507-1540; Elsevier., ISBN: 978-0-12-398358-9
  • Source
    • "The oral palatal, sublingual and tongue tissues are dissected by incising the joint on both sides of the mouth, opening the jaws and exposing the mouth [15]. The tissues from two mice are collected in ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) with antibiotics (penicillin (100 U/ml) and streptomycin (100 U/ml). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Utilizing mouse models provides excellent immunological and experimental tools to study oral immune responses. However for functional assays, isolating T lymphocytes from the oral tissues has proved to be challenging due to the absence of reliable methods that yield viable cells with consistency. To study adaptive immune cell interactions in the oral mucosal tissues, it is necessary to isolate T cells with a good viability and study them at the single cell level. We have established an improved method to isolate immune cells, including Tregs and Th17 cells from intra-epithelial niches and lamina propria of the tongue, gingival and palatal tissues in the oral mucosa of mice. This new method of isolating immune cells from oral tissues will enable us to further our understanding of oral tissue immune cells and their role during oral infections and oral inflammation.
    Biological Procedures Online 03/2014; 16(1):4. DOI:10.1186/1480-9222-16-4 · 1.79 Impact Factor
Show more