Emergency Department Visits and Primary Care Among Adults With Chronic Conditions

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Community Studies, St Mary's Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Medical care (Impact Factor: 3.23). 11/2010; 48(11):972-80. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181eaf86d
Source: PubMed


An emergency department (ED) visit may be a marker for limited access to primary medical care, particularly among those with ambulatory care sensitive chronic conditions (ACSCC).
In a population with universal health insurance, to examine the relationships between primary care characteristics and location of last general physician (GP) contact (in an ED vs. elsewhere) among those with and without an ACSCC.
A cross-sectional survey using data from 2 cycles of the Canadian Community Health Survey carried out in 2003 and 2005.
The study sample comprised Québec residents aged ≥18 who reported at least one GP contact during the previous 12 months, and were not hospitalized (n = 33,491).
The primary outcome was place of last GP contact: in an ED versus elsewhere. Independent variables included the following: lack of a regular physician, perceived unmet healthcare needs, perceived availability of health care, number of contacts with doctors and nurses, and diagnosis of an ACSCC (hypertension, heart disease, chronic respiratory disease, diabetes).
Using multiple logistic regression, with adjustment for sociodemographic, health status, and health services variables, lack of a regular GP and perceptions of unmet needs were associated with last GP contact in an ED; there was no interaction with ACSCC or other chronic conditions.
Primary care characteristics associated with GP contact in an ED rather than another site reflect individual characteristics (affiliation with a primary GP and perceived needs) rather than the geographic availability of healthcare, both among those with and without chronic conditions.

Download full-text


Available from: Jean-Frederic Levesque,
  • Source
    • "By virtue of their low socio-economic status and lack of attachment they are marginalized in Canada’s health care system. We focus on chronic illnesses because people managing chronic illnesses require timely access to care [40] and yet are more likely to be unattached than those without chronic health conditions [12]. This may be due, in part, to the fact that Canadian family doctors can choose who to accept into their practices, and so it is thought that difficult or challenging patients are screened out [20]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Unattached patients do not have a regular primary care provider. Initiatives are being developed to increase attachment rates across Canada. Most existing attention paid to patient unattachment has focused on quantifying the problem and health system costs. Our purpose is to qualitatively identify the implications of chronically ill patients' experiences of unattachment for health policy and planning to provide policy-relevant insights for Canadian attachment initiatives. Three focus groups were conducted with marginalized chronically ill individuals residing in a mid-sized city in British Columbia who are unattached to a family doctor. We use the term marginalized as a descriptor to acknowledge that by virtue of their low socio-economic status and lack of attachment the participants are marginalized in Canada's health care system Focus groups were structured as an open conversation organized around a series of probing questions. They were digitally recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was employed. Twenty-six individuals participated in the focus groups. The most common chronic illnesses reported were active drug addiction or recovery (and their associated symptoms), depression, arthritis, and hepatitis C. Participants identified life transitions as being the root cause for not having a family doctor. There was a strong sense that unsuccessful attempts to get a family doctor reflected that they were undesirable patients. Participants wanted to experience having a trusting relationship with a regular family doctor as they believed it would encourage greater honesty and transparency. One of the main health concerns regarding lack of access to a regular family doctor is that participants lacked access to preventative care. Participants were also concerned about having a discontinuous medical record due to unattachment. Participants perceived that there are many benefits to be had by having attachment to a regular family doctor and that experiencing unattachment challenged their health and access to health care. We encourage more research to be done on the lived experience of unattachment in order to provide on-the-ground insights that policy-makers require in order to develop responsive, patient-centred supports and programs.
    BMC Family Practice 07/2012; 13(1):69. DOI:10.1186/1471-2296-13-69 · 1.67 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Frail patients have increased chances of access to Emergency Department (ED) and hospital admission. ED discharge of frail patients (FP) implies high risk of poor outcome. A program of early ED discharge of FPs managed by community nurses (CN) for patients whose hospitalization is not indicated, but cannot be discharged is described. Prospective observational study. A CN, in cooperation with other professionals, assessed the feasibility of discharge and activated the appropriate facilities for a safe patient return to the community. Patients' length of stay in ED, mortality and readmission rate to ED 3 months after discharge were measured. The mean age of the 210 enrolled patients was 82.9 years. The reasons for ED access were either acute or worsened chronic diseases, mainly related to orthopedic/traumatic events and pain. Ninety-two persons were sent back home and 118 to residential facilities. In the following 3 months, mortality was 15.7%; almost 36% of discharged patients had at least one access to hospital and the overall readmission rate was 55.7%, higher in sent home group. CNs, when integrated with other ED staff, can successfully manage early discharges of 'at risk' patients. The high readmission rate may reflect some enduring difficulties to manage in the community, problems traditionally treated in hospital.
    Assistenza infermieristica e ricerca: AIR 07/2011; 30(3):117-25. DOI:10.1702/970.10585 · 0.32 Impact Factor
  • Source

Show more