Cognitive impairment of vascular origin: Neuropathology of cognitive impairment of vascular origin

Institut de Neuropatologia, Servei Anatomia Patològica, IDIBELL-Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, 08907 Hospitalet de LLobregat, Spain.
Journal of the neurological sciences (Impact Factor: 2.26). 12/2010; 299(1-2):139-49. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2010.08.039
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The term cognitive impairment of vascular origin is used to designate global cognitive deficits as well as focal neurological deficits such as aphasia, apraxia and agnosia of vascular/circulatory origin. It has been useful for identifying early clinical and neuroradiological alterations that might permit therapeutic strategies geared to curbing the progression of cerebrovascular disease. Multi-infarct encephalopathy, infarcts in strategic areas, lacunae and lacunar status, Binswanger's encephalopathy, hippocampal sclerosis, cortical granular atrophy and watershed infarcts are common lesions. Hypertension and vascular diseases such as arteriosclerosis, small blood vessel disease, inflammatory diseases of the blood vessels, Sneddon syndrome, cerebral amyloid angiopathies, cerebral autosomic dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL), and Maeda's syndrome are causative of cognitive impairment of vascular origin. Other less common causes are hereditary endotheliopathy with retinopathy, neuropathy and strokes (HERNS), cerebro-retinian vasculopathy (CRV), hereditary vascular retinopathy (HVR) (all three linked to 3p21.1-p21.3), hereditary infantile hemiparesis with arteriolar retinopathy and leukoencephalopathy (HIHRATL) (not linked to 3p21), fibromuscular dysplasia, and moya-moya disease. Lack of uniformity of clinical manifestations, the variety of vascular diseases and circulatory factors, the diverse, but often convergent, neuropathological substrates, and the common association with unrelated neurodegenerative diseases in the elderly, make it hard to assume a single clinical approach in the diagnosis and treatment of cognitive impairment of vascular origin. Rather, environmental and genetic risk factors, underlying vascular diseases, associated systemic, metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases and identification of extent and distribution of lesions with morphological and functional neuroimaging methods should be applied in every individual patient.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Cerebrovascular diseases are caused by interruption or significant impairment of the blood supply to the brain, which leads to a cascade of metabolic and molecular alterations resulting in functional disturbance and morphological damage. These pathophysiological changes can be assessed by positron emission tomography (PET), which permits the regional measurement of physiological parameters and imaging of the distribution of molecular markers. PET has broadened our understanding of the flow and metabolic thresholds critical for the maintenance of brain function and morphology: in this application, PET has been essential in the transfer of the concept of the penumbra (tissue with perfusion below the functional threshold but above the threshold for the preservation of morphology) to clinical stroke and thereby has had great impact on developing treatment strategies. Radioligands for receptors can be used as early markers of irreversible neuronal damage and thereby can predict the size of the final infarcts; this is also important for decisions concerning invasive therapy in large ("malignant") infarctions. With PET investigations, the reserve capacity of blood supply to the brain can be tested in obstructive arteriosclerosis of the supplying arteries, and this again is essential for planning interventions. The effect of a stroke on the surrounding and contralateral primarily unaffected tissue can be investigated, and these results help to understand the symptoms caused by disturbances in functional networks. Chronic cerebrovascular disease causes vascular cognitive disorders, including vascular dementia. PET permits the detection of the metabolic disturbances responsible for cognitive impairment and dementia, and can differentiate vascular dementia from degenerative diseases. It may also help to understand the importance of neuroinflammation after stroke and its interaction with amyloid deposition in the development of dementia. Although the clinical application of PET investigations is limited, this technology had and still has a great impact on research into cerebrovascular diseases.
    Neuroscience Bulletin 08/2014; 30(5). DOI:10.1007/s12264-014-1463-y · 1.83 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Vascular dementia (VaD) is the second most common cause of dementia and leads to a decline in cognitive thinking via conditions that lead to blockage or reduced blood flow to the brain. It is a poorly understood disease, and the changes that occur are often linked to other types of dementia such as Alzheimer's disease. To date, there are no approved therapies or drugs to treat the symptoms of VaD, even though there is some evidence of drugs approved for Alzheimer's that might have some benefit in patients diagnosed with VaD. The altered blood flow that precedes VaD may result in compensatory mechanisms, such as angiogenesis, to increase blood flow in the brain. Angiogenesis, the process of new blood vessel formations from pre-existing ones, involves several pro-angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and is regulated by a variety of growth factors from neurons, astrocytes, and pericytes in the brain as well the extracellular matrix (ECM). The ECM highly regulates angiogenesis and other processes in the brain. One such ECM component is the heparan sulfate proteoglycan perlecan and its bioactive region, Domain V (DV). Here we discuss the potential role of DV as a novel therapy to treat VaD.
    Metabolic Brain Disease 06/2014; 30(1). DOI:10.1007/s11011-014-9576-6 · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A major problem in elderly patients is the high incidence of multiple pathologies, referred to as multimorbidity, in the aging brain. It has been increasingly recognized that co-occurrence of neurodegenerative proteinopathies and other pathologies including cerebrovascular disorders is a frequent event in the brains of both cognitively intact and impaired aged subjects. Although clinical and neuropathological diagnostic criteria of the major neurodegenerative diseases have been improved, major challenges arise from cerebral multimorbidity, and the thresholds to cause clinical overt dementia are ill defined. More than 80 % of aged human brains show neurodegenerative non-Alzheimer type proteinopathies and other pathologies which, however, frequently have been missed clinically and are even difficult to identify at neuropathological examination. Autopsy studies differ in selection criteria and the applied evaluation methods. Therefore, irrespective of the clinical symptoms, the frequency of cerebral pathologies vary considerably: Alzheimer-related pathology is seen in 19-100 %, with "pure" Alzheimer's disease (AD) in 17-72 %, Lewy pathology in 6-39 % (AD + Lewy disease 9-28 %), vascular pathologies in 28-93 % (10.7-78 % "pure" vascular dementia), TDP-43 proteinopathy in 6-39 %, hippocampal sclerosis in 8-1 %, and mixed pathologies in 10-93 %. These data clearly suggest that pathologically deposited proteins in neurodegenerating diseases mutually interact and are influenced by other factors, in particular cardiovascular and cerebrovascular ones, to promote cognitive decline and other clinical symptoms. It is obvious that cognitive and other neuropsychiatric impairment in the aged result from a multimorbid condition in the CNS rather than from a single disease and that the number of complex pathologies progresses with increasing age. These facts have implications for improvement of the clinical diagnosis and prognosis, the development of specific biomarkers, preventive strategies and better treatment of cerebral multimorbidity.
    Journal of Neural Transmission 08/2014; 122(4). DOI:10.1007/s00702-014-1288-x · 2.87 Impact Factor