Article

The accuracy of the procalcitonin test for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis.

Department of Paediatrics, Nanjing Maternal and Child Health Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Scandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases (Impact Factor: 1.64). 10/2010; 42(10):723-33. DOI: 10.3109/00365548.2010.489906
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT A meta-analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of the procalcitonin (PCT) test for diagnosing neonatal sepsis. The major databases, MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published between January 1996 and May 2009 that evaluated PCT as a diagnostic marker for neonatal sepsis and provided sufficient data to calculate sensitivity and specificity. Twenty-two studies were included in the analysis. Trials that evaluated the PCT test for the diagnosis of early-onset neonatal sepsis at different time points (birth, 0-12 h, 12-24 h, and 24-48 h) and late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) all showed moderate accuracy (Q* = 0.79, 0.86, 0.81, 0.82, and 0.77, respectively). The PCT test was more accurate than the C-reactive protein (CRP) test for the diagnosis of LONS. A sensitivity analysis found that differences in PCT assay producer, gestational age and severity of sepsis in the study population may partially explain the between-studies heterogeneity. The PCT test showed moderate accuracy in diagnosing neonatal sepsis, regardless of differences in diagnostic criteria and time points for testing. For the diagnosis of LONS, the PCT test showed better accuracy than the CRP test. PCT is a valuable additional tool for the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis.

3 Followers
 · 
159 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The identification of early noninvasive biochemical markers of disease is a crucial issue of the current scientific research, particularly during the first period of life, since it could provide useful and precocious diagnostic information when clinical and radiological signs are still silent. The ideal biomarker should be practical and sensitive in the precocious identification of at risk patients. An earlier diagnosis may lead to a larger therapeutic window and improve neonatal outcome. Brain damage and sepsis are common causes of severe morbidity with poor outcome and mortality during the perinatal period. A large number of potential biomarkers, including neuroproteins, calcium binding proteins, enzymes, oxidative stress markers, vasoactive agents, and inflammatory mediators, have been so far investigated. The aim of the present review was to provide a brief overview of some of the more commonly investigated biomarkers used in case of neonatal brain damage and sepsis.
    01/2015; 2015:1-10. DOI:10.1155/2015/253520
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this prospective study, we examined the usefulness of C-reactive protein (CRP), soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells (s-TREM-1), and procalcitonin (PCT), in identifying serious bacterial infection (SBI) among neonates. Infants younger than 3 months with suspected SBI were included and serum concentrations of CRP, PCT, and s-TREM-1 were determined. Results. A total of 112 patients (19 with SBI and 93 with negative cultures) were evaluated. There were no statistical differences between the 2 groups regarding age, presence of fever, and serum concentrations of the different biomarkers. Performance of the different biomarkers were as follows: The sensitivities were 45%, 55%, and 82% for CRP, PCT, and s-TREM-1, respectively, whereas the specificities we 82%, 75%, and 48% for CRP, PCT, and s-TREM-1, respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve were 0.6, 0.63, and 0.61, for CRP, PCT, and s-TREM-1, respectively. Conclusions. In real-life pediatric practice, none of the tested biomarkers was sufficiently accurate to serve as a reliable indicator for the identification of SBI in neonates.
    Clinical Pediatrics 10/2014; DOI:10.1177/0009922814553435 · 1.26 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As neonatal sepsis is a severe condition, there is a call for reliable biomarkers to differentiate between infected and noninfected newborns. Although blood culture has been considered as the gold standard, this analysis is still too slow and limited by false negative results. Use of CRP is hampered by a physiological 3-day increase, resulting in a low sensitivity to detect sepsis at an early stage. A moderate diagnostic accuracy of other acute phase proteins has been demonstrated (serum amyloid A, procalcitonin, lipopolysaccharide binding protein, mannose binding lectin and hepcidin).
    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry 02/2015; DOI:10.1016/j.cca.2015.01.031 · 2.76 Impact Factor