Increased In-hospital Complications After Primary Posterior versus Primary Anterior Cervical Fusion

Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.88). 03/2011; 469(3):649-57. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1549-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although anterior (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCDF) are relatively common procedures and both are associated with certain complications, the relative frequency and severity of these complications is unclear. Since for some patients either approach might be reasonable it is important to know the relative perioperative risks for decision-making.
The purposes of this study were to: (1) characterize the patient population undergoing ACDF and PCDF; (2) compare perioperative complication rates; (3) determine independent risk factors for adverse perioperative events; and (4) aid in surgical decision-making in cases in which clinical equipoise exists between anterior and posterior cervical fusion procedures.
The National Inpatient Sample was used and entries for ACDF and PCDF between 1998 and 2006 were analyzed. Demographics and complication rates were determined and regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality after ACDF and PCDF.
ACDF had a shorter length of stay and their procedures were more frequently performed at nonteaching institutions. The incidence of complications and mortality was 4.14% and 0.26% among patients undergoing ACDF and 15.35% and 1.44% for patients undergoing PCDF, respectively. When controlling for overall comorbidity burden and other demographic variables, PCDF was associated with a twofold increased risk of a fatal outcome compared with ACDF. Pulmonary, circulatory, and renal disease were associated with the highest odds for in-hospital mortality.
PCDF procedures were associated with higher perioperative rates of complications and mortality compared with ACDF surgeries. Despite limitations, these data should be considered in cases in which clinical equipoise exists between both approaches.
Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Download full-text


Available from: Stavros G Memtsoudis, Jun 21, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Surgical site infections increase the incidence of morbidity and mortality as well as health-care expenses. The cost of care increases threefold to fourfold as a consequence of surgical site infection after spinal surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine the role of subcutaneous fat thickness in the development of surgical site infection following cervical spine fusion surgery. We performed a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of 213 adult patients who underwent posterior cervical spine fusion between 2006 and 2008 at Duke University Medical Center. The horizontal distance from the lamina to the skin surface at the C5 level and the thickness of subcutaneous fat were measured, and the ratio of the fat thickness to the total distance at the surgical site was determined. Previously identified risk factors for the development of surgical site infection were also recorded. Twenty-two of the 213 patients developed a postoperative infection. Obesity (body mass index ≥ 30 kg/m2) was not a significant risk factor for surgical site infection; the body mass index (and 95% confidence interval) was 29.4 ± 1.2 kg/m2 in the patients who developed a surgical site infection compared with 28.9 ± 0.94 kg/m2 in the patients without an infection. However, the thickness of subcutaneous fat and the ratio of the fat thickness to the lamina-to-skin distance were both significant risk factors for infection. The thickness of subcutaneous fat was 27.0 ± 2.5 mm in the patients who developed a surgical site infection group compared with 21.4 ± 0.88 mm in the patients without an infection (p = 0.042). The ratio of fat thickness to total thickness was 0.42 ± 0.019 in the patients who developed a surgical site infection compared with 0.35 ± 0.01 in the patients without an infection (p = 0.020). Multivariate analysis revealed this ratio to be an independent risk factor for developing a postoperative infection (odds ratio, 3.18; 95% confidence interval, 1.02 to 9.97). The study demonstrated that the thickness of subcutaneous fat at the surgical site is a factor in the development of surgical site infection following cervical spine fusion and deserves assessment in the preoperative evaluation. Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 02/2013; 95(4):323-8. DOI:10.2106/JBJS.L.00225 · 4.31 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the frequency of spinal surgical procedures has been increasing, particularly in patients of age 65 and over (geriatric), multiple overlapping comorbidities increase their risk/complication rates. Nevertheless, sometimes these high-risk geriatric patients are considered for "unnecessary", too much (instrumented fusions), or too little [minimally invasive surgery (MIS)] spine surgery. In a review of the literature and reanalysis of data from prior studies, attention was focused on the increasing number of operations offered to geriatric patients, their increased comorbidities, and the offers for "unnecessary" spine fusions, including both major open and MIS procedures. In the literature, the frequency of spine operations, particularly instrumented fusions, has markedly increased in patients of age 65 and older. Specifically, in a 2010 report, a 28-fold increase in anterior discectomy and fusion was observed for geriatric patients. Geriatric patients with more comorbid factors, including diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease (prior procedures), depression, and obesity, experience higher postoperative complication rates and costs. Sometimes "unnecessary", too much (instrumented fusions), and too little (MIS spine) surgeries were offered to geriatric patients, which increased the morbidity. One study observed a 10% complication rate for decompression alone (average age 76.4), a 40% complication rate for decompression/limited fusion (average age 70.4), and a 56% complication rate for full curve fusions (average age 62.5). Increasingly, spine operations in geriatric patients with multiple comorbidities are sometimes "unnecessary", offer too much surgery (instrumentation), or too little surgery (MIS).
    Surgical Neurology International 12/2011; 2:188. DOI:10.4103/2152-7806.91408 · 1.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Retrospective cohort study.Objective. To determine the incidence of and factors predicting thirty day readmission after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).Summary of Background Data. ACDF is being performed on an increasing basis on a wider population of patients, which is accompanied by rising costs. Readmissions have the potential to further deplete health care resources. Though past studies have shown that readmissions after surgery are driven by operative complications, specific predictors of readmission after ACDF are not well researched.Methods. All patients who underwent ACDF or anterior corpectomy and fusion procedures in 2011 were selected from the American College of Surgeon's National Quality Improvement database. Readmissions were analyzed based on demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, and complications were compared in univariate analyses. Multivariate logistic regression models were created to isolate the independent effects of preoperative and postoperative factors on readmission.Results. The nationwide readmission rate after ACDF surgery in this study is 2.5%. Pulmonary complications (8.5%), wound complications (8.5%), and urinary tract infections (8.5%) are the most common complications seen in readmitted patients. Readmitted patients were significantly older (58 vs. 53, p = 0.003), with higher rates of diabetes and hypertension (28.8% vs. 13.9%, p = 0.001; 64.4% vs. 42.6%, p = 0.001, respectively). Though certain preoperative factors such as age ≥ 65 and preoperative stay >24 hours increase the odds of operative complications (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.0-6.0; OR 6.2, 95% CI 3.4-11.1, respectively), hypertension may independently increase the likelihood of readmission outside of any effect on complications (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.4).Conclusion. The data in this study suggests that surgeons are already controlling readmission rates by limiting peri- and post-operative complications, but patients with a history of hypertension could have an increased likelihood of being readmitted despite avoiding a complication.
    Spine 10/2013; 39(2). DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000051 · 2.45 Impact Factor