Article

Increased In-hospital Complications After Primary Posterior versus Primary Anterior Cervical Fusion

Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research (Impact Factor: 2.88). 03/2011; 469(3):649-57. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1549-4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although anterior (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusion (PCDF) are relatively common procedures and both are associated with certain complications, the relative frequency and severity of these complications is unclear. Since for some patients either approach might be reasonable it is important to know the relative perioperative risks for decision-making.
The purposes of this study were to: (1) characterize the patient population undergoing ACDF and PCDF; (2) compare perioperative complication rates; (3) determine independent risk factors for adverse perioperative events; and (4) aid in surgical decision-making in cases in which clinical equipoise exists between anterior and posterior cervical fusion procedures.
The National Inpatient Sample was used and entries for ACDF and PCDF between 1998 and 2006 were analyzed. Demographics and complication rates were determined and regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality after ACDF and PCDF.
ACDF had a shorter length of stay and their procedures were more frequently performed at nonteaching institutions. The incidence of complications and mortality was 4.14% and 0.26% among patients undergoing ACDF and 15.35% and 1.44% for patients undergoing PCDF, respectively. When controlling for overall comorbidity burden and other demographic variables, PCDF was associated with a twofold increased risk of a fatal outcome compared with ACDF. Pulmonary, circulatory, and renal disease were associated with the highest odds for in-hospital mortality.
PCDF procedures were associated with higher perioperative rates of complications and mortality compared with ACDF surgeries. Despite limitations, these data should be considered in cases in which clinical equipoise exists between both approaches.
Level II, prognostic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

1 Follower
 · 
169 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Object Anterior cervical plating decreases the risk of pseudarthrosis following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Dysphagia is a common complication of ACDF, with the anterior plate implicated as a potential contributor. A zero-profile, stand-alone polyetheretherketone (PEEK) interbody spacer has been postulated to minimize soft-tissue irritation and postoperative dysphagia, but studies are limited. The object of the present study was to determine the clinical and radiological outcomes for patients who underwent ACDF using a zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device, with a focus on the course of postoperative prevertebral soft-tissue thickness and the incidence of dysphagia. Methods Using a surgical database, the authors conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who had undergone ACDF between August 2008 and October 2011. All patients received a Zero-P implant (DePuy Synthes Spine). The Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for arm and neck pain were documented. Dysphagia was determined using the Bazaz criteria. Prevertebral soft-tissue thickness, spinal alignment, and subsidence were assessed as well. Results Twenty-two male and 19 female consecutive patients, with a mean age of 58.4 ± 14.68, underwent ACDF (66 total operated levels) in the defined study period. The mean clinical follow-up in 36 patients was 18.6 ± 9.93 months. Radiological outcome in 37 patients was assessed at a mean follow-up of 9.76 months (range 7.2-19.7 months). There were significant improvements in neck and arm VAS scores and the NDI following surgery. The neck VAS score improved from a median of 6 (range 0-10) to 0 (range 0-8; p < 0.001). The arm VAS score improved from a median of 2 (range 0-10) to 0 (range 0-7; p = 0.006). Immediate postoperative dysphagia was experienced by 58.4% of all patients. Complete resolution was demonstrated in 87.8% of affected patients at the latest follow-up. The overall median Bazaz score decreased from 1 (range 0-3) immediately postoperatively to 0 (range 0-2; p < 0.001) at the latest follow-up. Prevertebral soft-tissue thickness significantly decreased across all levels from a mean of 15.8 ± 4.38 mm to 10.1 ± 2.93 mm. Postoperative lordosis was maintained at the latest follow-up. Mean subsidence from the immediate postoperative to the latest follow-up was 4.1 ± 4.7 mm (p < 0.001). Radiographic fusion was achieved in 92.6% of implants. No correlation was found between prevertebral soft-tissue thickness and Bazaz dysphagia score. Conclusions A zero-profile integrated plate and spacer device for ACDF surgery produces clinical and radiological outcomes that are comparable to those for nonintegrated plate and spacer constructs. Chronic dysphagia rates are comparable to or better than those for previously published case series.
    Journal of Neurosurgery Spine 08/2014; 21(4):1-9. DOI:10.3171/2014.6.SPINE12951 · 2.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Retrospective cohort studyObjective. To determine the impact of spine surgeon specialty on 30-day post-operative complication rates of single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs).Summary of Background Data. ACDFs are performed by both neurological and orthopaedic surgeons. Although previous studies have examined pre-operative risk factors for post-operative complications in ACDFs, no studies have shown the impact of surgical specialty on these variables.Methods. All patients who underwent any single-level ACDF between 2006 and 2012 were selected from the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Propensity-score matching was utilized to reduce confounding pre-operative differences. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, and complications were compared between the two surgical specialties using univariate analyses. Multivariate logistic regression models were created to isolate independent effects of surgeon specialty on complications.Results. A total of 1,944 patients undergoing single-level ACDFs were included in our analysis. 19.9% and 80.1% of ACDFs were performed by orthopaedic surgeons (ORTHO) and neurosurgeons (NEURO), respectively. NEURO patients had a higher number of comorbidities. After propensity matching, however, all preoperative variables did not vary significantly between the specialty cohorts. Multivariate analysis of the propensity-matched groups revealed that for single-level ACDFs, treating physician cohort (ORTHO vs NEURO) was not associated with higher odds for overall complications (OR 1.708, 95% CI 0.849-3.436, p = 0.133), surgical site complications (OR 0.869, 95% CI 0.233-3.247, p = 0.835), or medical complications (OR 1.863, 95% CI 0.805-4.311, p = 0.146).Conclusion. Spine surgeon specialty is not a risk factor for any reported post-operative complication in patients undergoing single-level ACDFs.
    Spine 06/2014; 39(20). DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000499 · 2.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The sequelae of atlantoaxial instability (AAI) range from axial neck pain to life-threatening neurologic injury. Instrumentation and fusion of the C1-2 joint is often indicated in the setting of clinical or biomechanical instability. This is the first clinical report of anterior Smith-Robinson C1-2 transarticular screw (TAS) fixation for AAI. The first patient presented with ischemic brain tissue secondary to post-traumatic C1-2 segment instability from a MVC 7 years prior to presentation. The second patient presented with a 3 year history of persistent right-sided neck and upper scalp pain. Both were treated with transarticular C1-2 fusion through decortication of the atlantoaxial facet joints and TAS fixation via the anterior Smith-Robinson approach. At 16 months follow-up, the first patient maintained painless range of motion of the cervical spine and denied sensorimotor deficits. The second patient reported 90% improvement in her pre-operative symptoms of neck pain and paresthesia. Anterior Smith-Robinson C1-2 TAS fixation provides a useful alternative to the posterior Goel and Magerl techniques for C1-2 stabilization and fusion.
    Journal of craniovertebral junction and spine 07/2013; 4(2):85-9. DOI:10.4103/0974-8237.128540

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
44 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014