Article

Peripheral modulation of pheromone response by inhibitory host compound in a beetle.

Chemical Ecology, Department of Plant Protection Biology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-230 53 Alnarp, Sweden.
Journal of Experimental Biology (Impact Factor: 3.24). 10/2010; 213(Pt 19):3332-9. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.044396
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We identified several compounds, by gas chromatographic-electroantennographic detection (GC-EAD), that were antennally active in the bark beetle Ips typographus and also abundant in beetle-attacked spruce trees. One of them, 1,8-cineole (Ci), strongly inhibited the attraction to pheromone in the field. Single-sensillum recordings (SSRs) previously showed olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) on I. typographus antennae selectively responding to Ci. All Ci neurons were found within sensilla co-inhabited by a pheromone neuron responding to cis-verbenol (cV); however, in other sensilla, the cV neuron was paired with a neuron not responding to any test odorant. We hypothesized that the colocalization of ORNs had a functional and ecological relevance. We show by SSR that Ci inhibited spontaneous activity of the cV neuron only in sensilla in which the Ci neuron was also present. Using mixtures of cV and Ci, we further show that responses to low doses (1-10 ng) of cV were significantly reduced when the colocalized Ci neuron simultaneously responded to high doses (1-10 μg) of Ci. This indicated that the response of the Ci neuron, rather than ligand-receptor interactions in the cV neuron, caused the inhibition. Moreover, cV neurons paired with Ci neurons were more sensitive to cV alone than the ones paired with the non-responding ORN. Our observations question the traditional view that ORNs within a sensillum function as independent units. The colocalization of ORNs might sharpen adaptive responses to blends of semiochemicals with different ecological significance in the olfactory landscape.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
128 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The sense of smell is crucial for fitness of most animals, enabling them to find mates, food, and egg laying sites, and to stay away from danger. Hence, odour molecules are detected by sensitive and specific olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs). In insects, the OSNs are stereotypically grouped into olfactory sensilla located mainly on the antennae. The functional significance of this co-localisation principle is poorly understood, but it has been hypothesised that it allows for coincidence detection of odour filaments, improving discrimination of closely separated odour sources.Using an insect in its natural environment, we conducted the first experimental test of the hypothesis. We manipulated the distance between odour sources of an attractive pheromone and either of two host-derived attraction antagonists (1,8-cineole and verbenone) and investigated the effect on trap catches of the bark beetle, Ips typographus (Coleoptera). 1,8-Cineole is detected by an OSN co-localised with an OSN for one of the pheromone components, while verbenone is detected by OSNs in other sensilla, not co-localised with pheromone OSNs.Consistent with the hypothesis, trap catch increased with distance between odour sources more for 1,8-cineole than for verbenone. The strongest effect was found among the males, i.e. the gender that first locates and attacks the host tree.Our data from the beetle provide, for the first time, direct experimental support for the hypothesis that co-localisation of OSNs in sensilla improves the discrimination of closely separated odour sources. Thus, selection for improved odour source discrimination could well be one of the factors explaining the strict co-localization of OSNs that is seen across the Insecta class. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
    Functional Ecology 10/2014; 28(5):1216-1223. · 4.86 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the search for compounds that contribute to the host or habitat discrimination, antennae of Ips typographus were screened for sensitivity to volatiles released by spruce trap-trees using gas chromatography linked to electroantennography. The antennally active compounds were determined using comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography with time-of-flight mass spectrometric detection. Data show that I. typographus antennae respond to compounds emitted by the host. In total, 18 of antennally active compounds were detected: alpha-pinene, camphene, sabinene, beta-pinene, myrcene, delta-3-carene, p-cymene, limonene, beta-phellandrene, 1,8-cineole, gamma-terpinene, terpinolene, nonanal, camphor, trans-pinocamphone, cis-pinocamphone, terpinen-4-ol, and verbenone. Unequivocal identification of all active minor compounds is provided and confirmed using synthetic standards. Compounds in minor quantities like 1,8-cineole, beta-phellandrene, camphor, cis-pinocamphone, and trans-pinocamphone were more active than major spruce monoterpenes. We hypothesize that the minor spruce compounds may play so far unrecognized role in conveying information about host suitability for I. typographus.
    Arthropod-Plant Interactions 06/2014; · 1.57 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Chemically mediated behaviour of insects is often strongly affected by mixtures of odour stimuli and their temporal characteristics. Both sensory transduction and central processing of odour mixtures can give rise to several different kinds of interaction, which can influence how individual components are perceived and processed. In particular, odour mixtures have been examined in model experiments as premixed binary mixtures in comparison with pure odour stimuli. Only in few experiments, the influence of the temporal structure of odour mixtures on odour perception has been taken into account. Natural odour stimuli often have a pulsed structure and may in general be superimposed on a background of irrelevant or interfering compounds, which can fluctuate with different frequencies, depending on their source. To achieve a better representation of these natural conditions, our odour mixing experiments apply a new kind of stimulation protocol: odours were not premixed but superimposed with a specific time pattern; one odour stimulus was presented as a longer persisting background and the second stimulus was a superimposed short test signal. To gain an overview of odour interaction patterns in the Colorado potato beetle by causing adaptation of one receptor population at naturally occurring levels of concentration and time intervals, electroantennographic recordings were made on excised antennae. A matrix of 12 stimulus compounds led to 132 pairs of compounds tested, each in the role of background and test stimulus. In 64 cases, the interaction was significantly different, when the role of background and stimulus was exchanged. Interaction patterns ranging from no interference (independence) to suppression were found and assigned to four clearly distinguishable types. We discuss that the observed effects of the presentation sequence in odour mixtures may contribute to the mechanisms of olfactory pattern recognition and olfactory contrast perception by insects.
    Journal of Applied Entomology 01/2012; 136(5). · 1.56 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
39 Downloads
Available from
May 28, 2014