Article

A fulminant colitis index greater or equal to 8 is not predictive of colectomy risk in infliximab-treated moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis attacks

Pôle reins-digestif-nutrition, service d'hépato-gastroentérologie et nutrition, CHU de Caen, BP 95182, 14033 Caen cedex 9, France.
Gastroentérologie Clinique et Biologique (Impact Factor: 1.14). 11/2010; 34(11):612-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.gcb.2010.07.013
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT In severe attacks of ulcerative colitis (UC) treated with intravenous corticosteroids, a fulminant colitis index (FCI) greater or equal to 8 has been associated with a greater likelihood of colectomy (72 vs 16% with an FCI<8). This retrospective study aimed to assess the accuracy of such an association in infliximab-treated patients with moderate-to-severe bouts of UC.
The study was based on the medical files of 43 patients who had received at least one infusion of infliximab to treat moderate-to-severe UC (partial Mayo Clinic score). Remission and clinical response were also assessed using the partial Mayo score. The accuracy of an FCI greater or equal to 8 to predict the likelihood of colectomy was assessed by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, Yule's Q coefficient, Youden's index and statistical significance (Chi(2) test).
After treatment with infliximab, 10 patients were in remission (23.3%), 21 (48.8%) had a clinical response, four (9.3%) had treatment failure (without, however, requiring colectomy) and eight (18.6%) had a colectomy. Calculation of the above-mentioned indicators revealed that an FCI greater or equal to 8 was not an indicator of the risk of colectomy in this patient population, and found that only an FCI greater or equal to 16 was statistically significant. However, low values for sensitivity, positive predictive value and Youden's index preclude the clinical application of this latter result.
In patients treated with infliximab for moderate-to-severe UC attacks, the FCI is not a predictor of colectomy. In such patients, the factors predictive of a response to treatment or likelihood of colectomy, currently acknowledged with corticosteroid treatment, need to be further assessed for infliximab treatment.

0 Followers
 · 
140 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is consistent evidence that 50% of patients with acute, steroid-resistant flare of ulcerative colitis (UC) may achieve remission and avoid colectomy if treated with cyclosporin (CsA). However, follow-up of the responders has shown that most of them relapse and need surgery shortly after the response. We compared the records of our CsA-treated patients with those of other groups in order to help clarify this matter. All patients admitted consecutively to our Unit with an attack of UC and treated with CsA between January 1991 and December 1999 were studied. Patients were begun on continuously-infused CsA at 2 mg/kg/day (1991-1996), or on NEORAL at an initial dose of 5 mg/kg/day (1996-1999). The maintenance treatment included oral CsA for 3-6 months with or without azathioprine (AZA). CsA failure was defined as a relapse requiring steroids with or without progression to colectomy; the cumulative probability of relapse/colectomy was assessed by Fisher's exact tests and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Among the patients, 39/61 (63%) initially responded. These 39 included a fatality and 4 drop-outs (unrelated to the side-effects of CsA), leaving 34 patients for the study. Of these, 61% and 35% were colectomy-free at 1 and 7 years, respectively; the corresponding figures were 80 and 60% respectively in the subset treated with AZA, but 47% and 15% in the AZA-untreated subgroup (p= 0.0007 at 7 years). Among the 34 patients, 44% were relapse-free at 1 year, but all had relapsed at 7 years (p = 0.0635). The overall resort to colectomy was 72%, while 19% of the patients remained colectomy-free. Sixty percent of a cohort of patients with steroid-refractory colitis responded to CsA and 60% of these responders retained the colon after 1 year. These figures fell to 35% at 7 years but improved to 60% on AZA. The overall need for colectomy remains high in these patients and toxicity must be monitored.
    BMC Gastroenterology 02/2007; 7:13. DOI:10.1186/1471-230X-7-13 · 2.11 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Iv cyclosporin A (CSA) is an effective therapy in patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC). It remains unclear if this treatment affects the course of the disease in the long run. We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety in 86 patients with ulcerative colitis treated with i.v. CSA at our center. The records of all patients treated with i.v. CSA between 11/1992 and 11/2000 were reviewed. Seventy-two of 86 patients (83.7%) responded to i.v. CSA therapy, administered for a mean of 9 +/- 2 days. Following the initial treatment, 69 patients (96%) were discharged on oral CSA with mean blood CSA concentrations of 192 +/- 55 ng/mL. Azathioprine was added in 64 (89%) patients. A second treatment with CSA was necessary in 11 patients; 1 patient received three courses of i.v. treatment. The duration of follow-up averaged 773 +/- 369 days. Patients who were responders but were still having certain symptoms at discharge had a higher incidence of colectomy during follow-up. Of all initial responders, 18 (25%) underwent colectomy after a mean interval of 178 +/- 141 days. The life-table predicts that of all treated patients, 55% will avoid a colectomy during a period of 3 years. Complications of CSA treatment were mostly reversible, but 3 patients (3.5%) died of opportunistic infections (1 of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and 2 of Aspergillus fumigatus pneumoniae). One patient with anaphylactic shock caused by the CSA solvent was successfully resuscitated. CSA is an effective treatment of the majority of patients with severe attacks of UC, although the toxicity and even mortality associated with its use necessitates careful evaluation, selection, and follow-up.
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 04/2004; 10(2):73-8. DOI:10.1097/00054725-200403000-00002 · 5.48 Impact Factor
  • Gastroenterology 03/2007; 132(2):763-86. DOI:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.12.038 · 13.93 Impact Factor