Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta quartz glass-ceramic inserts
Division of Operative Dentistry, Department of Restorative and Preventive Dentistry, Loyola University, USA.Quintessence international (Impact Factor: 0.95). 11/1993; 24(11):793-8.
With the increasing demand for esthetic posterior restorations, numerous techniques have been developed. The direct resin restoration has probably been used most extensively in Class II situations. Problems with Class II direct resin restorations include difficulty in developing proximal contact, occlusal wear, and polymerization shrinkage. Beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts have been developed in an attempt to reduce the incidence of these potential problems. They can be placed in a one-appointment technique, are relatively inexpensive, and can readily be utilized by the clinician adept in placing Class II composite resin restorations.
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: Objectives. Electronic databases are not sufficiently up to date to provide comprehensive notation of the most recent literature for reference in developing scientificpapers. The objective of this summary was to identify and categonize the 1993 dental materials scientific literature that dealt with restorative dentistry. Methods. 17 primary journals were manually searched via the tables of contents, and 101 secondary journals were manually or electronically searched. Dental materials citations were categorized into 15 major sections and several subsections, excluding case reports and all the literature primarily related to dental implants or biomedical materials outside of dentistry. Results. This study identified 786 citations, the largest number being associated with glass ionomers and composites. Significance. This citation list provides a comprehensive source for review by academicians and researchers that bridges the gap between initial publication and electronic citation.Dental Materials 02/1994; 10(1-10):59-76. DOI:10.1016/0109-5641(94)90023-X · 3.77 Impact Factor
- 01/2002; 27(4):394. DOI:10.5395/JKACD.2002.27.4.394
- [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: summary Ceramic inserts are reported to possibly reduce polymerization shrinkage for posterior resin composite fillings. The aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the effect of different insert systems before and after thermomechanical loading. Sixty sound human third molars received occlusomesial Class II cavities, 40 with proximal margins 2 mm above and 20 with proximal margins 1 mm below the cementum-enamel junction. The specimens were randomly assigned to one of the six experimental groups (n = 10). The enamel-bordered cavities were restored with Syntac classic and Tetric Ceram (ST), Syntac classic, Tetric Ceram and beta-quartz inserts (TB), Syntac classic, Tetric Ceram and Cerana inserts (TC), Syntac classic, Tetric flow and SonicSys approx inserts (TS). The dentin-limited cavities were filled with Syntac classic and Tetic Ceram (DT), Syntac classic, Tetric flow and SonicSys approx inserts (DS). Before and after thermomechanical loading (100 000 x 50 N, 2500 x 5 degrees C/55 degrees C), replicas were made and both interfaces tooth/composite and insert/composite were examined under a scanning electron microscope at 200x. The Cerana and SonicSys insert groups showed significantly less gaps in enamel (P < 0.05). With beta-quartz inserts, no reduction of gaps was found (P > 0.05). Marginal integrity in dentine-bordered specimens could not be improved with SonicSys inserts (P > 0.05). The bonding performance insert/composite was promising for all IPS Empress inserts (Cerana, SonicSys enamel) but worse for beta-quartz inserts. Regarding gap formation between resin composite and tooth, Cerana and SonicSys inserts significantly reduced gaps. The use of SonicSys inserts in deep proximal cavities cannot be recommended.Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 09/2005; 32(8):606-13. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01459.x · 1.68 Impact Factor
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.