Reliability and validity study of the Finnish version 2.0 of the oswestry disability index.

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Jyväskylä Central Hospital, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Spine (Impact Factor: 2.16). 02/2011; 36(4):332-8. DOI:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cdd702
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Prospective clinical validation study.
The aims of this study were to translate into Finnish and culturally adapt and study the psycho-metric properties of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 2.0.
The ODI is one of the most commonly reported back-specific disability questionnaires. It is widely used both in clinical work and in medical studies. To date, no validated Finnish version of the ODI version 2.0 has been reported.
The ODI version 2.0 was translated into the Finnish language. A total of 115 patients with back pain, referred by the primary care physician to the outpatient clinic of the department of physical medicine and rehabilitation, were recruited for this study. The patients answered a questionnaire package that included the Finnish ODI 2.0, Back Pain Questionnaire for Visual Analogue Assessment (Million-VAS), Visual Analogue Scales of back and leg pain (VASback, VASleg), the Depressions Scale, and a question on their subjectively perceived health. The package was administered twice; 2 weeks before and at the arrival to the clinic.
Reproducibility of the ODI was 0.90 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.85-0.94) and the internal consistency was 0.86 (95% CI = 0.81-0.90). Factor analysis showed that the ODI was loaded on 2 factors, which explained 51% of the total variance. In testing convergent validity ODI correlated with Million-VAS, r = 0.75 (95% CI = 0.64-0.84); VASback, r = 0.48 (95% CI = 0.32-0.62); and VAS leg, r = 0.41 (95% CI = 0.23-0.57).
The Finnish ODI version 2.0 proved to be a valid and reliable instrument that showed psychometric properties comparable with the original English version. Therefore, it can be used in assessing the disability among Finnish-speaking patients with back pain for both clinical and scientific purposes.

0 0
1 Bookmark
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Study Design. Translation and psychometric testing.Objectives. To cross-culturally adapt the Neck Disability Index (NDI) to Arabic language and to investigate the reliability and validity of the Arabic version of NDI in an Arabic-speaking sample with neck pain.Summary of Background Data. Although largely used, no previous reports exist in the translation process or the testing of the psychometric properties of the Arabic version of the NDI.Methods. Cross-cultural adaptation of an outcome questionnaire. The English version of the NDI was translated into Arabic (NDI-Ar) and back-translated according to established guidelines. Sixty five patients with neck pain completed the NDI -Ar twice over one week, to assess its test-retest reliability. Further psychometric testing was done by assessing internal consistency, construct validity (factor structure) and responsiveness.Results. The internal consistency value (Cronbach alpha) for the NDI-Ar was 0.89. The test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient) was excellent 0.96 (95% CI from 0.93 to 0.97). There was a significant correlation (r = 0.92, P<0.05) between the scores obtained from the first administration of the NDI-Ar and the second administration. Factor analysis demonstrated a 2- factor structure, explaining 67.58% of total variance. The analysis of responsiveness was calculated with an unpaired t-test after one week of treatment and demonstrating a statically significant difference between stable and improved patients (P<0.05).The Spearman's correlation coefficient (rS = 0.81; P = 0.000) revealed strong relation between the change score in the NDI-Ar and Global Rating of Change (GRC). No ceiling or floor effects were detected in the NDI-Ar.Conclusions. The Arabic version of the NDI has a 2-factor 10-item structure and is a reliable, valid and responsive tool that can be used to assess neck pain in Arabic- speaking patients with neck pain. Therefore, it can be recommended for clinical and research purposes.
    Spine 02/2013; · 2.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of the present study was to compare one-year-follow-up data on disability and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) between spinal fusion patients and age- and sex-matched general population. The data on fusion patients were collected prospectively using a spinal fusion data base in two Finnish hospitals. A general population sample matched for age, sex and residential area was drawn from the Finnish Population Register. All participants completed a questionnaire and the main outcome measures were the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36). Altogether 252 (69% females) fusion patients and 682 (67% females) population sample subjects participated in the study. In general population the mean ODI was 15 (SD 17) in females and 9 (SD 13) in males. The corresponding preoperative ODI values were 47 (SD16) and 40 (SD 15) and one year follow-up values 22 (SD 17) and 23 (SD 20). In both sexes the ODI decreased significantly after surgery but remained higher than in the general population, p < 0.001. The physical component summary score (PCS) of the SF-36 was lower in the patients than general population sample both preoperatively and at one-year follow-up (p < 0.001). The mental component summary score (MCS) was lower preoperatively (p < 0.001), but reached the general population level after one year in both men (p = 0.42) and women (p = 0.61). Disability and HRQoL improved significantly after spinal fusion surgery during a one- year follow-up. However, the patients did not reach the level of the general population in the ODI or in the physical component of HRQoL at that time, although in the mental component the difference disappeared.
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 07/2013; 14(1):211. · 1.88 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of depressive symptoms and disability pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after lumbar spine fusion surgery. Data was extracted from a dedicated lumbar spine fusion register, giving 232 patients (mean age 62 years, 158 females) who had undergone instrumented lumbar spine fusion. The frequency of depressive symptoms and disability was evaluated using the Depression Scale (DEPS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Depressive symptoms were found in 34, 13, and 15 % of the patients pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after surgery, respectively. The mean DEPS score decreased from 16.2 to 8.6 (p < 0.001) in patients who had depressive symptoms pre-operatively, and from 6.1 to 3.8 (p < 0.001) in those patients without pre-operative depressive symptoms. The mean ODI values pre-operatively, at 3 months and at 1 year after surgery were 53, 30, and 23, respectively, in patients with pre-operative depressive symptoms and 41, 23, and 20 in those patients without pre-operative depressive symptoms. The differences between the groups were statistically significant at all time points (p < 0.001). One-third of our patients with chronic back pain undergoing spinal fusion had depressive symptoms pre-operatively. The prevalence of depressive symptoms decreased after surgery. Although disability remained higher in those patients who had reported depressive symptoms pre-operatively, disability did decrease significantly in both groups post-operatively. Thus, there is no need to exclude depressive patients from operation, but screening measures and appropriate treatment practises throughout both pre-operative and post-operative periods are encouraged.
    European Spine Journal 07/2013; · 2.13 Impact Factor


Available from
Apr 6, 2013