Article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of radiotherapy in various head and neck cancers: comparing photons, carbon-ions and protons.

Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Cancer Treatment Reviews (Impact Factor: 6.02). 05/2011; 37(3):185-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2010.08.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To synthesize and compare available evidence considering the effectiveness of carbon-ion, proton and photon radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
A systematic review and meta-analyses were performed to retrieve evidence on tumor control, survival and late treatment toxicity for carbon-ion, proton and the best available photon radiotherapy.
In total 86 observational studies (74 photon, 5 carbon-ion and 7 proton) and eight comparative in-silico studies were included. For mucosal malignant melanomas, 5-year survival was significantly higher after carbon-ion therapy compared to conventional photon therapy (44% versus 25%; P-value 0.007). Also, 5-year local control after proton therapy was significantly higher for paranasal and sinonasal cancer compared to intensity modulated photon therapy (88% versus 66%; P-value 0.035). No other statistically significant differences were observed. Although poorly reported, toxicity tended to be less frequent in carbon-ion and proton studies compared to photons. In-silico studies showed a lower dose to the organs at risk, independently of the tumor site.
For carbon-ion therapy, the increased survival in mucosal malignant melanomas might suggest an advantage in treating relatively radio-resistant tumors. Except for paranasal and sinonasal cancer, survival and tumor control for proton therapy were generally similar to the best available photon radiotherapy. In agreement with included in-silico studies, limited available clinical data indicates that toxicity tends to be lower for proton compared to photon radiotherapy. Since the overall quantity and quality of data regarding carbon-ion and proton therapy is poor, we recommend the construction of an international particle therapy register to facilitate definitive comparisons.

1 Bookmark
 · 
72 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background. Intestinal-type adenocarcinoma (ITAC) is a rare and locally-aggressive occupation-related tumour. Nowadays, endoscopic-assisted resection and advances in irradiation modalities (3D-CRT/IMRT) are emerging as an alternative to traditional open surgery and conventional radiotherapy. Methods. Retrospective analysis of 30 consecutive patients affected with sinonasal ITAC, primarily treated by an endoscopic approach followed by 3D-CRT/IMRT at a single Institution, from 2003 to 2010. Results. The 5-year overall, disease-specific, disease-free and recurrence-free survivals were 72.7±9.6%, 78±9.5%, 67.9±10.7% and 69.2±9.4%, respectively (mean follow-up, 48 months). No major complications or serious toxicities were observed. Prognostic factors were: stage of disease at diagnosis, development of recurrences, status of surgical margins, grading, tumoural pattern of growth and proliferative index (Ki67). Conclusion. The low morbidity of endoscopic approaches, the acceptable toxicity of modern irradiation modalities and this promising survival rates, indicate that this treatment strategy might be considered a safe, minimally-invasive and maximally-effective option for treating selected sinonasal ITAC. Head Neck, 2014.
    Head & Neck 03/2014; · 2.83 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on its potent capacity to induce tumor cell death and to abrogate clonogenic survival, radiotherapy is a key part of multimodal cancer treatment approaches. Numerous clinical trials have documented the clear correlation between improved local control and increased overall survival. However, despite all progress, the efficacy of radiation-based treatment approaches is still limited by different technological, biological, and clinical constraints. In principle, the following major issues can be distinguished: (1) The intrinsic radiation resistance of several tumors is higher than that of the surrounding normal tissue, (2) the true patho-anatomical borders of tumors or areas at risk are not perfectly identifiable, (3) the treatment volume cannot be adjusted properly during a given treatment series, and (4) the individual heterogeneity in terms of tumor and normal tissue responses toward irradiation is immense. At present, research efforts in radiation oncology follow three major tracks, in order to address these limitations: (1) implementation of molecularly targeted agents and 'omics'-based screening and stratification procedures, (2) improvement of treatment planning, imaging, and accuracy of dose application, and (3) clinical implementation of other types of radiation, including protons and heavy ions. Several of these strategies have already revealed promising improvements with regard to clinical outcome. Nevertheless, many open questions remain with individualization of treatment approaches being a key problem. In the present review, the current status of radiation-based cancer treatment with particular focus on novel aspects and developments that will influence the field of radiation oncology in the near future is summarized and discussed.
    Biophysik 10/2013; · 1.70 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To study the oncological outcome of the patients with unresectable locally advanced primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base, treated with particle radiotherapy. Fifty-seven patients with unresectable primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base received proton or carbon ion radiotherapy as definitive treatment at Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center between 2003 and 2009. Forty-seven patients were treated with proton radiotherapy and 10 patients were treated with carbon ion radiotherapy. A retrospective review was performed with clinical charts and recorded imagings. With a median follow-up of 32 months, the 3-year actual survival and local progression-free rates of all the patients were 61 and 56%, respectively. The 3-year actual survival rates of adenoid cystic carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, adenocarcinoma and malignant melanoma were 83, 44, 75, 0 and 38%, respectively. The 3-year actual local control rates of adenoid cystic carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, olfactory neuroblastoma, adenocarcinoma and malignant melanoma were 63, 31, 83, 50 and 0%, respectively. Distant metastasis was observed in 13 of 25 patients in adenoid cystic carcinoma, two of 14 patients in squamous cell carcinoma, one of six patients with olfactory neuroblastoma, two of four patients with adenocarcinoma, three of four patients with malignant melanoma and two of three patients with undifferentiated carcinoma. Mucositis and dermatitis were seen as acute toxicities. The most common late toxicity was visual disorder. Grades 2, 3 and 4 visual disorders were observed in seven, five and two patients, respectively. Proton and carbon ion radiotherapy resulted in satisfactory local control in patients with locally advanced unresectable primary head and neck cancers invading the skull base.
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology 03/2014; · 1.90 Impact Factor