Article

Requiring an amyloid-beta1-42 biomarker for prodromal Alzheimer's disease or mild cognitive impairment does not lead to more efficient clinical trials.

Department of Psychiatry, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Alzheimer's & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer's Association (Impact Factor: 17.47). 09/2010; 6(5):367-77. DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.07.004
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Low cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-beta(1-42) concentration and high total-tau/Abeta(1-42) ratio have been recommended to support the diagnosis of prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD) in patients with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (aMCI) and also to select patients for clinical trials (Shaw et al, Ann Neurol 2009;65:403-13; Dubois et al, Lancet Neurol 2007;6:734-46).
We tested this recommendation with clinical trials simulations using patients from the Alzheimer Disease Neuroimaging Initiative who fulfilled the following entry criteria: (1) aMCI, (2) aMCI with CSF Abeta(1-42) <or=192 mg/mL, (3) and aMCI with total-tau/Abeta(1-42) >0.39. For each criterion, we randomly resampled the database obtaining samples for 1000 trials for each trial scenario, planning for 1 or 2 year trials with samples from 50 to 400 patients per treatment or placebo group, with up to 40% dropouts, outcomes after using the AD assessment scale-cognitive subscale and clinical dementia rating scale with effect sizes ranging from 0.15 to 0.75, and calculated statistical power.
Approximately 70% to 74% of aMCI patients with CSF measures met biomarker criteria. The addition of the low Abeta(1-42) or high tau/Abeta(1-42) requirement resulted in minimal or no increase in the power of the trials compared with enrolling aMCI without requiring the biomarker criteria. Slightly larger mean differences between the placebo and treatment groups fulfilling biomarker criteria were offset by increased outcome variability within the groups.
Although patients with aMCI or patients with prodromal AD meeting CSF biomarkers criteria were slightly more cognitively impaired and showed greater decline than patients with aMCI diagnosed without considering the biomarkers, the requirement of biomarker-positive patients would most likely not result in more efficient clinical trials, and trials would take longer because fewer patients would be available. A CSF Abeta(1-42) marker, however, could be useful as an explanatory variable or covariate when warranted by the action of a drug.

Full-text

Available from: Gary R Cutter, Jul 14, 2014
0 Followers
 · 
71 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Biomarkers are characteristics that are objectively measured and evaluated as indicators of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to a therapeutic intervention. Amyloid measures become abnormal early in the disease process and have only weak correlations with disease progression and cognitive decline; CSF tau, brain atrophy, and reduced cortical metabolism correlate with cognitive measures and disease progression. Combinations of biomarkers have higher correlations and are better predictors of future decline than single biomarkers. Current biomarkers do not account for all of the variance of AD; a more complete repertoire of biomarkers that more comprehensively assay the disease process is needed.Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2013); Accepted article preview online 8 October 2013; doi:10.1038/clpt.2013.205.
    Clinical Pharmacology &#38 Therapeutics 10/2013; 95(1). DOI:10.1038/clpt.2013.205 · 7.39 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To assist investigators in making design choices, we modeled Alzheimer's disease prevention clinical trials. We used longitudinal Clinical Dementia Rating Scale Sum of Boxes data, retention rates, and the proportions of trial-eligible cognitively normal participants age 65 and older in the National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center Uniform Data Set to model trial sample sizes, the numbers needed to enroll to account for drop out, and the numbers needed to screen to successfully complete enrollment. We examined how enrichment strategies affected each component of the model. Relative to trials enrolling 65-year-old individuals, trials enriching for older (minimum 70 or 75) age required reduced sample sizes, numbers needed to enroll, and numbers needed to screen. Enriching for subjective memory complaints reduced sample sizes and numbers needed to enroll more than age enrichment, but increased the number needed to screen. We conclude that Alzheimer's disease prevention trials can enroll elderly participants with minimal effect on trial retention and that enriching for older individuals with memory complaints might afford efficient trial designs.
    Neurobiology of aging 10/2013; 35(3). DOI:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.09.001 · 4.85 Impact Factor
  • JAMA Neurology 06/2014; 71(8). DOI:10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.1120 · 7.01 Impact Factor