Article

Warning: google can be hazardous to your health: fertility preservation is an important part of cancer care.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cancer treatment and research 01/2010; 156:467-8. DOI:10.1007/978-1-4419-6518-9_36
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT As a resident, I had the opportunity to take care of a young woman with an ovarian germ cell tumor. She initially presented
to an outside facility with an ovarian cyst believed to be benign. Following a cystectomy at this facility where the frozen
pathologic specimen was determined benign, the final pathology unexpectedly returned as malignant. She then presented to the
University of Chicago oncology service for a second opinion. She underwent conservative surgery with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy
and lymph node sampling, and the contralateral ovary and uterus were grossly normal and preserved. This fertility-preserving
surgery is standard of care for women with germ cell tumors confined to one ovary that have not completed childbearing. She
was to return to the inpatient chemotherapy service for her BEP (bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin) regimen following recovery
from the surgery.

0 0
 · 
0 Bookmarks
 · 
35 Views
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare malignant ovarian germ cell tumor survivors with a matched control group of females on menstrual and reproductive outcomes, sexual functioning, and dyadic adjustment. Eligible patients met the following criteria: (1) history of malignant ovarian germ cell tumor; (2) treatment with surgery plus platinum-based chemotherapy; (3) age at least 18 years and continuously disease-free with minimum follow-up of 2 years; (4) capability of completing questionnaire and telephone interview; and (5) completion of written informed consent. The control group was drawn from acquaintances recommended by survivors and matched for age, race, and education. Scales with established reliability and validity were used to measure quality-of-life concepts of sexual functioning and social networks. One hundred thirty-two survivors and 137 controls completed the study. Of 132 survivors, 71 (53.8%) had fertility-sparing surgery. Of fertile survivors, 62 (87.3%) reported still having menstrual periods. Twenty-four survivors reported 37 offspring after cancer treatment. Compared with controls, survivors had significantly greater reproductive concerns (P < .0001), less sexual pleasure (P = .003), and lower scores on the total Sexual Activity Scale Score (P = .001). However, survivors had better dyadic consensus (P = .004), dyadic satisfaction (P = .005), and dyadic cohesion (P = .014). Women who had fertility-sparing surgery were very likely to retain menstrual function and fertility after chemotherapy. Although there is some increase in gynecologic symptoms and diminution in sexual pleasure, survivors tended to have stronger, more positive relationships with significant others.
    Journal of Clinical Oncology 07/2007; 25(19):2792-7. · 18.04 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To analyze the long-term effects on reproductive function of fertility-preserving treatment for malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary. A case series analysis was performed on patients with malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary seen or consulted on at our institution between 1975 and 1995. Follow-up information regarding reproductive function was obtained by a mailed or telephone questionnaire. A total of 106 patients with malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary were included in the study. Twenty patients were excluded because of loss of follow-up or death. For the remaining 86 patients, the median follow-up was 122 months (24-384 months). Fertility-preserving surgery was performed in 64 patients. Thirty-eight have attempted conception and 29 have achieved at least one pregnancy (76%). Among the patients who conceived, 20 were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, one was stage II, and eight were stage III. Sixteen received vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide; three received cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin; three received bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin; one received etoposide and cisplatin; four did not receive any chemotherapy; and two were treated with other combinations. Among the nine patients who could not conceive, seven were FIGO stage I and two were stage III. Four of these patients received vincristine, actinomycin D, and cyclophosphamide; three received etoposide and cisplatin; one received cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin; and one patient received no chemotherapy. A total of 38 children were born to these women. Follow-up was available for 16 of these children, who have no evidence of congenital anomalies. Fertility-preserving surgery followed by chemotherapy, even in advanced-stage malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary, is effective in conserving the reproductive function of women with malignant germ cell tumors of the ovary.
    Obstetrics and Gynecology 03/2003; 101(2):251-7. · 4.80 Impact Factor
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Aggressive chemotherapy and radiotherapy or radical oncological surgery in young women with cancer has greatly enhanced these patients' life expectancy, but these treatments often cause infertility or premature ovarian failure due to a massive destruction of the ovarian reserve. The objective of this review is to discuss the effect of the various cancer treatments on fertility and present the various fertility sparing operations and fertility preservation strategies. An extensive survey of the most up-to-date literature was performed. This review discusses the impact of current cancer treatment on fertility potential and the various surgical and assisted-reproduction innovations available today for the most common cancers in young women. Although the ability to retain reproductive potential is becoming a major quality-of-life factor in an increasing number of young female cancer survivors, they are still being poorly counseled with regard to the negative impact of the treatment on their fertility and on their options for fertility preservation. As the emerging discipline of fertility preservation is steadily attracting increasing interest, developments in the near future promise to be very exciting. However, in everyday routine work, better interdisciplinary cooperation between gynecological and pediatric oncologists, surgeons, immunologists, and endocrinologists is necessary so that individualized options for fertility preservation can be offered in advance of surgical procedures or cancer treatments.
    Gynecologic Oncology 01/2007; 103(3):1109-21. · 3.93 Impact Factor

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from

Jennifer Hirshfeld-Cytron