Effects of a central cholinesterase inhibitor on reducing falls in Parkinson disease(Podcast)(e–Pub ahead of print)(LOE Classification)

Department of Neurology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Neurology (Impact Factor: 8.3). 10/2010; 75(14):1263-9. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f6128c
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT To investigate if a central cholinesterase inhibitor will reduce falling frequency in subjects with Parkinson disease (PD) with advanced postural instability.
Falling due to postural instability is a significant problem in advancing PD, and is minimally impacted by dopaminergic therapy. Anticholinergic medications increase falling in the elderly. Further, CNS cholinergic neuron loss occurs in PD. We hypothesized that acetylcholine augmentation may reduce frequent falling in subjects with PD.
We enrolled 23 subjects with PD who reported falling or nearly falling more than 2 times per week. In a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover design, subjects were given 6 weeks of donepezil or placebo with a 3-week washout between phases. The primary outcomes were daily falls and near falls reported on postcards. Secondary outcomes included scores on the Activities of Balance Confidence Scale, Berg Balance Scale, Clinical Global Impression of Change, Folstein Mini-Mental State Examination, and the motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.
Fall frequency per day on placebo was 0.25 ± 0.08 (SEM) compared with 0.13 ± 0.03 on donepezil (p < 0.05). The frequency of near falls was not significantly different between phases. The secondary outcomes did not differ; however, there was a trend to improvement on the subject-completed Global Impression of Change scale.
Subjects with PD fell approximately half as often during the 6 weeks on donepezil than on placebo. Larger trials of cholinergic augmentation are warranted in subjects with PD with frequent falls. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that donepezil (maximum 10 mg per day) significantly reduced the number of falls in patients with PD (0.13 falls/day, SEM = 0.03) than when taking placebo (0.25 falls/day, SEM = 0.08, p = 0.049).

Download full-text


Available from: Fay Horak, Oct 24, 2014
  • Neurology 10/2010; 75(14):1226-7. DOI:10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181f5d507 · 8.30 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is evidence that deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the pedunculopontine tegmental nucleus (PPTg) improves parkinsonian motor signs. The mechanisms that mediate these effects and the modifications that occur in the PPTg in Parkinson's disease (PD) are not fully known and are the object of current debate. The aim of this paper was to critically review available data with respect to (1) the presence of PPTg neurons linked to reticulospinal projections, (2) the involvement of these neurons in modulating spinal reflexes, and (3) the participation of fibers close to or within the PPTg region in such modulation. The PPTg neurons are distributed in a large pontotegmental region, stimulation of which can evoke activity in hindlimb, shoulder and neck muscles, and potentiate motor responses evoked by stimulation of dorsal roots. This influence seems to be carried out by fast-conducting descending fibers, which likely run in the medial reticulospinal pathway. It is yet unclear which neurotransmitters are involved and on which elements of the gray matter of the spinal cord PPTg fibers synapse. The modulation of spinal cord activity which can be achieved by stimulating the PPTg region seems to be mediated not only by PPTg neurons, but also by tecto-reticular fibers which run in the pontotegmental area, and which likely are activated during PPTg-DBS. The importance of these fibers is discussed taking into account the degeneration of PPTg neurons in PD and the benefits in gait and postural control that PPTg-DBS exerts in PD. The potential usefulness of PPTg-DBS in other neurodegenerative disorders characterized by neuronal loss in the brainstem is also considered.
    Journal of Neural Transmission 12/2010; 118(10):1409-21. DOI:10.1007/s00702-010-0532-2 · 2.87 Impact Factor
Show more