Does It Matter Where You Go for Breast Surgery? Attending Surgeon's Influence on Variation in Receipt of Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

Division of General Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Medical care (Impact Factor: 3.23). 10/2010; 48(10):892-9. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181ef97df
Source: PubMed


Concerns about the use of mastectomy and breast reconstruction for breast cancer have motivated interest in surgeon's influence on the variation in receipt of these procedures.
To evaluate the influence of surgeons on variations in the receipt of mastectomy and breast reconstruction for patients recently diagnosed with breast cancer.
Attending surgeons (n = 419) of a population-based sample of breast cancer patients diagnosed in Detroit and Los Angeles during June 2005 to February 2007 (n = 2290) were surveyed. Respondent surgeons (n = 291) and patients (n = 1780) were linked. Random-effects models examined the amount of variation due to surgeon for surgical treatment. Covariates included patient clinical and demographic factors and surgeon demographics, breast cancer specialization, patient management process measures, and attitudes about treatment.
Surgeons explained a modest amount of the variation in receipt of mastectomy (4%) after controlling for patient clinical and sociodemographic factors but a greater amount for reconstruction (16%). Variation in treatment rates across surgeons for a common patient case was much wider for reconstruction (median, 29%; 5th-95th percentile, 9%-65%) then for mastectomy (median, 18%; 5th-95th percentile, 8% and 35%). Surgeon factors did not explain between-surgeon variation in receipt of treatment. For reconstruction, 1 surgeon factor (tendency to discuss treatment plans with a plastic surgeon prior to surgery) explained a substantial amount of the between-surgeon variation (31%).
Surgeons have largely adopted a consistent approach to the initial surgery options. By contrast, the wider between-surgeon variation in receipt of breast reconstruction suggests more variation in how these decisions are made in clinical practice.

Download full-text


Available from: Ann S Hamilton,
22 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To investigate the relationship between supply of subspecialty care and type of procedure preferentially performed for early stage breast cancer. Three surgical options exist for early stage breast cancer: (1) breast conserving surgery (BCS), (2) mastectomy with reconstruction (RECON), and (3) mastectomy alone. Current guidelines recommend that surgical treatment decisions should be based on patient preference if a patient is eligible for all 3. However, studies demonstrate persistent variation in the use of BCS and RECON. Patients undergoing an operation for DCIS or stage I or II breast cancer at NCCN institutions between 2000 and 2006 were identified. Institutional procedure rates were determined. Spearman correlations measured the association between procedure types. Patient-level logistic regression models investigated predictors of procedure type and association with institutional supply of subspecialty care. Among 10,607 patients, 19% had mastectomy alone, 60% BCS, and 21% RECON. The institutional rate of BCS and RECON were strongly correlated (r = -0.80, P = 0.02). Institution was more important than all patient factors except age in predicting receipt of RECON or BCS. RECON was more likely for patients treated at an institution with a greater supply of reconstructive surgeons or where patients live further from radiation facilities. RECON was less likely at institutions with longer waiting times for surgery with reconstruction. Even within the NCCN, a consortium of multidisciplinary cancer centers, the use of BCS and mastectomy with reconstruction substantially varies by institution and correlates with the supply of subspecialty care.
    Annals of surgery 06/2011; 254(2):339-45. DOI:10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182263bb0 · 8.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this era of rapidly evolving clinical knowledge, clinicians need to be aware of current research and how it might affect their practice. The Internet is a widely available, under-assessed tool for providing this information. In this two-phase pilot study, a novel Web site ( was developed to specifically disseminate relevant clinical information to community breast oncology surgeons. The first phase targeted a sample of community surgeons identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results catchment areas in Los Angeles, CA and Detroit, MI. The second phase broadened availability by linking the site through the American College of Surgeons (ACoS) Commission on Cancer (CoC) homepage. An eight-question, Web-based survey was used to obtain feedback regarding the Web site's utility and potential application to clinical practice. Journal continuing medical education credit was also offered through ACoS. For phase 1, of the 315 community surgeons invited to view the site, 114 (36%) participated in the study and 98 (86%) responded to the survey. Overall, there was a strongly supportive response, with 79 (81%) recommending the site to other clinicians. For phase 2, of the 516 site hits, 411 came from the ACoS site. Only 10 individuals completed the survey during this phase, but all positively endorsed the utility of the site. The implication for clinical practice is that the Internet is a useful tool for providing relevant clinical research to providers. In the future, this could be tailored to an individual's needs, aiding synthesis and, hopefully, improving the quality of clinical care.
    Journal of Oncology Practice 07/2011; 7(4):257-62. DOI:10.1200/JOP.2010.000195
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Many factors influence whether breast cancer patients undergo reconstruction after mastectomy. This study was undertaken to determine the patterns of care and variables associated with the use of reconstruction for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to compare previous results for invasive carcinoma. Postmastectomy reconstruction rates were collected from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (OSHPD) for 2003-2007. International Classification of Disease-9 codes were used to identify patients undergoing reconstruction after mastectomy. Variations in reconstruction rates were examined by type of breast cancer (DCIS vs. invasive), calendar year, age, type of insurance, type of hospital, and race/ethnicity. Univariate and multivariate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated for relative odds of immediate reconstruction versus mastectomy only. For multivariate analysis, age, race/ethnicity, type of insurance, and type of hospital were significantly associated with the use of reconstruction for DCIS patients. DCIS patients were twice as likely to undergo reconstruction as patients with invasive cancer (odds ratio (OR) = 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.75-2.13). DCIS patients with private insurance were nine times more likely to undergo reconstruction as patients with Medicaid (OR = 8.84, 95% CI = 5.92-13.21). Both Hispanic white and Asian patients were one-fifth as likely to undergo reconstruction compared with non-Hispanic white patients (OR = 0.18, 95% CI = 0.1-0.3; OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.09-0.31). Postmastectomy rates for DCIS were twice those for invasive cancer mostly because stage was not a limiting factor. However, significant factors remain that limit the use of reconstruction in this breast cancer population: age, race/ethnicity, type of hospital, and type of insurance.
    Annals of Surgical Oncology 08/2011; 18(11):3210-9. DOI:10.1245/s10434-011-2010-y · 3.93 Impact Factor
Show more