Comparative Determinants of 4-Year Cardiovascular Event Rates in Stable Outpatients at Risk of or With Atherothrombosis

VA Boston Healthcare System, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02132, USA.
JAMA The Journal of the American Medical Association (Impact Factor: 30.39). 09/2010; 304(12):1350-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2010.1322
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Clinicians and trialists have difficulty with identifying which patients are highest risk for cardiovascular events. Prior ischemic events, polyvascular disease, and diabetes mellitus have all been identified as predictors of ischemic events, but their comparative contributions to future risk remain unclear.
To categorize the risk of cardiovascular events in stable outpatients with various initial manifestations of atherothrombosis using simple clinical descriptors.
Outpatients with coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular disease, or peripheral arterial disease or with multiple risk factors for atherothrombosis were enrolled in the global Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) Registry and were followed up for as long as 4 years. Patients from 3647 centers in 29 countries were enrolled between 2003 and 2004 and followed up until 2008. Final database lock was in April 2009.
Rates of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke.
A total of 45,227 patients with baseline data were included in this 4-year analysis. During the follow-up period, a total of 5481 patients experienced at least 1 event, including 2315 with cardiovascular death, 1228 with myocardial infarction, 1898 with stroke, and 40 with both a myocardial infarction and stroke on the same day. Among patients with atherothrombosis, those with a prior history of ischemic events at baseline (n = 21,890) had the highest rate of subsequent ischemic events (18.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 17.4%-19.1%); patients with stable coronary, cerebrovascular, or peripheral artery disease (n = 15,264) had a lower risk (12.2%; 95% CI, 11.4%-12.9%); and patients without established atherothrombosis but with risk factors only (n = 8073) had the lowest risk (9.1%; 95% CI, 8.3%-9.9%) (P < .001 for all comparisons). In addition, in multivariable modeling, the presence of diabetes (hazard ratio [HR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.36-1.53; P < .001), an ischemic event in the previous year (HR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.57-1.85; P < .001), and polyvascular disease (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.78-2.24; P < .001) each were associated with a significantly higher risk of the primary end point.
Clinical descriptors can assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients within the broad range of risk for outpatients with atherothrombosis.

Download full-text


Available from: Elizabeth Mahoney, Aug 25, 2015
  • Source
    • "Chronic conditions such as atherothrombotic disease remain one of the most significant health problems in terms of morbidity and mortality in the world, and also impose a large burden on health care budgets [1] [2] [3]. Despite improvements in quality of life due to interventions, patients with atherothrombotic disease continue to be undertreated and do not receive secondary preventive medications as per recommended guidelines [2] [4]. Furthermore, the prevalence of disease and excess costs of care are expected to increase even further due to rapidly ageing population and high prevalence of abdominal obesity which in turn will pose a substantial burden [5] among this group of population. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Atherothrombotic diseases are the leading health problems in the world, both in terms of morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to identify and quantify the predictors of medication, hospital and outpatient service use among patients with or at high risk of atherothrombotic disease. Two-year follow-up data were analyzed for 2873 Australian participants of the Reduction of Atherothrombosis for Continued Health (REACH) registry. The analysis was performed using generalized linear models with Poisson and Gamma distributions and log link function. Participants with hypercholesterolemia, diabetes, hypertension, atrial fibrillation (AF), and history of coronary artery disease (CAD) used more medications (p<0.0001). The presence of diabetes predicted higher number of outpatient visits (RR=1.09, 95% CI: 1.07-1.11), as did AF (RR=1.10, 95% CI: 1.08-1.12). The presence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) regardless of ankle brachial index (ABI) status (abnormal or normal) increased the use of outpatient visits (RR=1.24, 95% CI: 1.20-1.29 and RR=1.12, 95% CI: 1.08-1.15), compared to those without PAD. Similarly, the presence of PAD regardless of ABI status increased the risk of vascular interventions, including coronary angioplasty, carotid surgery, amputation affecting lower-limb and peripheral bypass graft (RR=3.64, 95% CI: 2.01-6.60) (RR=2.8, 95% CI: 1.6-4.92) compared to patients without PAD. The presence of PAD regardless of ABI status predicts a higher number of outpatient visits, non-fatal cardiovascular endpoints and vascular-interventions, while diabetes predicts higher pharmaceutical use and outpatient visits. AF predicts the higher number of outpatient visits and non-fatal cardiovascular events.
    International journal of cardiology 04/2014; 175(1). DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.04.230 · 6.18 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "In younger age groups, it is already known that patients with prior CVD are at the highest risk of a recurrent cardiovascular event (Kerr et al. 2009). Within patients with prior CVD, a recent study showed that a history of ischemic events leads to a greater risk of future events than a history of stable coronary, cerebrovascular, or peripheral artery disease (Bhatt et al. 2010). At present , it is unknown whether these findings can also be applied to patients aged 85 and over. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study aimed to explore the prognosis of very old people depending on their cardiovascular disease (CVD) history. This observational prospective cohort study included 570 participants aged 85 years from the general population with 5-year follow-up for morbidity, functional status, and mortality. At baseline, participants were assigned to three groups: no CVD history, "minor" CVD (angina pectoris, transient ischemic attack, intermittent claudication, and/or heart failure), or "major" CVD (myocardial infarction [MI], stroke, and/or arterial surgery). Follow-up data were collected on MI, stroke, functional status, and cause-specific mortality. The composite endpoint included cardiovascular events (MI or stroke) and cardiovascular mortality. At baseline, 270 (47.4 %) participants had no CVD history, 128 (22.4 %) had minor CVD, and 172 (30.2 %) had major CVD. Compared to the no CVD history group, the risk of the composite endpoint increased from 1.6 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1.1-2.4) for the minor CVD group to 2.7 (95 % CI, 2.0-3.9) for the major CVD group. Similar trends were observed for cardiovascular and all-cause mortality risks. In a direct comparison, the major CVD group had a nearly doubled risk of the composite endpoint (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95 % CI, 1.2-2.7), compared to the minor CVD group. Both minor and major CVD were associated with an accelerated decline in cognitive function and accelerated increase of disability score (all p < 0.05), albeit most pronounced in participants with major CVD. CVD disease status in very old age is still of important prognostic value: a history of major CVD (mainly MI or stroke) leads to a nearly doubled risk of poor outcome, including cardiovascular events, functional decline, and mortality, compared with a history of minor CVD.
    Age 07/2012; DOI:10.1007/s11357-012-9443-5 · 3.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: First Page of the Article
    IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 07/1968; DOI:10.1109/T-ED.1968.16255 · 2.36 Impact Factor
Show more