Rakha EA, Reis-Filho JS, Baehner F, et al. Breast cancer prognostic classification in the molecular era: the role of histological grade. Breast Cancer Res.12:207

Department of Histopathology, Nottingham City Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham University, Nottingham, UK.
Breast cancer research: BCR (Impact Factor: 5.88). 07/2010; 12(4):207. DOI: 10.1186/bcr2607
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease with varied morphological appearances, molecular features, behavior, and response to therapy. Current routine clinical management of breast cancer relies on the availability of robust clinical and pathological prognostic and predictive factors to support clinical and patient decision making in which potentially suitable treatment options are increasingly available. One of the best-established prognostic factors in breast cancer is histological grade, which represents the morphological assessment of tumor biological characteristics and has been shown to be able to generate important information related to the clinical behavior of breast cancers. Genome-wide microarray-based expression profiling studies have unraveled several characteristics of breast cancer biology and have provided further evidence that the biological features captured by histological grade are important in determining tumor behavior. Also, expression profiling studies have generated clinically useful data that have significantly improved our understanding of the biology of breast cancer, and these studies are undergoing evaluation as improved prognostic and predictive tools in clinical practice. Clinical acceptance of these molecular assays will require them to be more than expensive surrogates of established traditional factors such as histological grade. It is essential that they provide additional prognostic or predictive information above and beyond that offered by current parameters. Here, we present an analysis of the validity of histological grade as a prognostic factor and a consensus view on the significance of histological grade and its role in breast cancer classification and staging systems in this era of emerging clinical use of molecular classifiers.

Download full-text


Available from: Stephen Fox, Aug 30, 2015
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There are several independent but interrelated prognostic factors predictive of recurrence and survival in breast cancer. These include axillary nodal status, histopathology, steroid receptors, proliferative rate, ploidy, and oncogene amplification. Axillary nodal status has been the traditional mainstay predictor for recurrence and survival in primary breast cancer. In addition, the presence of the estrogen and progesterone receptors has correlated with longer disease-free interval and overall survival in stage I and II breast cancer. Thymidine-labeling index and percent S-phase as measured by flow cytometry are indices of cell proliferation that correlate with relapse rate in pre- and postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Estrogen and progesterone receptor-negative tumors are more commonly aneuploid, and have higher percent S-phase, factors that predict for recurrence in Stage I breast cancer.
    Seminars in Surgical Oncology 01/1989; 5(2):102 - 110. DOI:10.1002/ssu.2980050206
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) represents the single most important prognostic indicator in patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The proportion of < or = 1-cm (T1a, T1b) invasive breast carcinomas is increasing. The incidence and predictive factors associated with ALNM in patients with < or = 1-cm tumors remains unclear and the role of axillary lymph node dissection in these patients has been questioned. The purpose of this study was to determine clinical and pathologic factors predictive of ALNM in patients with < or = 1-cm invasive breast carcinomas by univariate and multivariate analyses. Review analysis from a prospective database identified patients with < or = 1-cm invasive breast cancers treated at our institution between 1990 and 1996. All patients underwent a resection of the primary tumor and axillary lymph node dissections. Routine patient and tumor characteristics evaluated included: age, race, tumor size, histologic grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and lymphatic and vascular invasion. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are presented. A total of 919 patients were identified in this study with tumors < or = 1 cm. These included 199 patients (21.7%) with T1a tumors and 720 patients (78.3%) with T1b tumors. ALNM was detected in 165 patients with an overall incidence of 18.0%. Of the ALNM group, 32 patients (19.4%) had T1a tumors and 133 patients (80.6%) had T1b tumors. Four variables were found to be significant in univariate analysis. These included: increasing tumor size, poor histologic grade, presence of lymphatic or vascular invasion, and younger age of the patient. An increase in tumor size was associated with a significant risk of ALNM (OR = 2.66, 95% CI = 1.28 to 5.75; p = 0.01). Poor tumor grade and the presence of lymphatic or vascular invasion were also associated with an increased risk of ALNM (OR = 2.69, p = 0.003 and OR = 5.52, p = 0.0001, respectively). Patients with ALNM were more likely to have a tumor grade of 3 (25.0% ALNM versus 12.5% node-negative, p = 0.004) and lymphatic or vascular invasion (16.9% ALNM versus 3.5% node-negative, p < 0.0001). In multivariate analysis, an increased risk of ALNM was demonstrated with increasing tumor size (0.1-cm increments), poor histologic grade, and younger age. This study investigated clinical and pathologic factors influencing ALNM in patients with T1a and T1b breast carcinomas. We have identified three factors by multivariate analysis as significant independent predictors of ALNM in this group of patients. These include increasing tumor size, poor histologic grade, and younger age. Given the significant amount of ALNM demonstrated in this study (overall 18%) and the inability to identify a subgroup of patients that had an acceptable low risk of ALNM, the complete omission of assessing the axilla for metastatic disease in patients with small breast cancers cannot be advocated. Our recommendation for patients diagnosed with T1a and T1b tumors is to have their axilla investigated for metastatic disease either by traditional axillary lymph node dissections or by intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy techniques.
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons 07/2000; 191(1):1-6; discussion 6-8. · 4.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Nottingham Prognostic Index (NPI) is an integrated prognostic index used to predict patient survival for women with invasive breast cancer. The index is based on invasive tumour size, histological lymph node stage and tumour grade. The value of such an index has been questioned in small invasive breast cancers and it has been suggested that size is the only necessary prognostic determinant. The aims of this study were to determine the extent of regional lymph node involvement and survival in women with small invasive breast cancers and to assess the value of the NPI. Between 1976 and 1994, 2684 women aged < or = 70 years were treated for primary operable invasive breast cancers of < or = 5 cm in maximum diameter, of which 318 measured < or = 1 cm. Follow-up data were evaluated to determine histological factors important in predicting survival outcomes in women with cancers < or = 1 cm in diameter and comparing their survival according to the NPI with all women treated for primary operable breast cancers < or = 5 cm in maximum diameter. Histological lymph node involvement was demonstrated in 56/318 (18%) of cancers of < or = 1 cm in diameter. Significant survival differences were demonstrated for small breast cancers according to lymph node stage, vascular invasion and histological tumour grade. Only lymph node stage and histological tumour grade were independent prognostic indicators using a multivariate Cox model. The survival curves for small tumours stratified by the NPI were similar to those of cancers up to 5 cm in diameter. The results indicate that lymph node staging and histological grading are still important prognostic determinants for breast cancers < or = 1 cm in diameter. An axillary node staging procedure should be performed for all invasive breast cancers < or = 1 cm in diameter. The NPI remains relevant for small breast cancers.
    European Journal of Cancer 07/1999; 35(6):908-12. DOI:10.1016/S0959-8049(99)00056-8 · 4.82 Impact Factor
Show more