Article

Spinning in the Scanner: Neural Correlates of Virtual Reorientation

Department of Psychology, Brescia University College, 1285 Western Road, London, Ontario, Canada.
Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition (Impact Factor: 3.1). 09/2010; 36(5):1097-107. DOI: 10.1037/a0019938
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Recent studies have used spatial reorientation task paradigms to identify underlying cognitive mechanisms of navigation in children, adults, and a range of animal species. Despite broad interest in this task across disciplines, little is known about the brain bases of reorientation. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine neural activity in adults during a virtual reality version of the reorientation task. Three environments that varied in the cues provided were studied: a rectangular room with 4 identical gray walls (Geometry), a square room with 3 gray walls and 1 red wall (Feature), and a rectangular room with 3 gray walls and 1 red wall (Feature + Geometry). Multiple areas within the medial temporal lobe (MTL) showed increased activation when a feature was present compared with when reorientation was based only on geometric cues. In contrast, reliance on geometric cues significantly activated a number of non-MTL structures, including the prefrontal cortex and inferior temporal gyrus. These results provide neural evidence for processing differences between the 2 types of cue as well as insight into developmental and comparative aspects of reorientation.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Nora Newcombe, Aug 26, 2015
0 Followers
 · 
105 Views
  • Source
    • "riented , so it would be difficult to draw conclu - sions regarding brain regions involved in reorientation per se ( Sutton et al . , 2010 ) . Yet , in virtual reorientation studies , signif - icantly greater hippocampal activation following disorientation was found in conditions where a non - geometric feature ( i . e . , red wall ) was present ( Sutton et al . , 2010 , 2012 ) . The disparity in these findings implies the use of different neuropsychological mechanisms in reorienting . As such , virtual reorientation studies highlight the specific importance of the hippocampus in spatial reorientation . In sum , it appears that the hippocampus plays a sig - nificant role in remembering the locations of"
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Spatial navigation is an adaptive skill that involves determining the route to a particular goal or location, and then travelling that path. A major component of spatial navigation is spatial reorientation, or the ability to reestablish a sense of direction after being disoriented. The hippocampus is known to be critical for navigating, and has more recently been implicated in reorienting in adults, but relatively little is known about the development of the hippocampus in relation to these large-scale spatial abilities in children. It has been established that, compared to school-aged children, preschool children tend to perform poorly on certain spatial reorientation tasks, suggesting that their hippocampi may not be mature enough to process the demands of such a task. Currently, common techniques used to examine underlying brain activity, such as electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), are not suitable for examining hippocampal development in young children. In the present paper, we argue for the use of eyeblink conditioning (EBC), a relatively under-utilized, inexpensive, and safe method that is easy to implement in developing populations. In addition, EBC has a well defined neural circuitry, which includes the hippocampus, making it an ideal tool to indirectly measure hippocampal functioning in young children. In this review, we will evaluate the literature on EBC and its relation to hippocampal development, and discuss the possibility of using EBC as an objective measure of associative learning in relation to large-scale spatial skills. We support the use of EBC as a way to indirectly access hippocampal function in typical and atypical populations in order to characterize the neural substrates associated with the development of spatial reorientation abilities in early childhood. Thus, we advocate for EBC as a simple biomarker for success in various tasks that require the hippocampus, including spatial reorientation.
    Frontiers in Psychology 04/2015; 6. DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00490 · 2.80 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "When adults must remember and relocate an object while navigating through a virtual environment, they automatically encode the position of the object relative to the shape of extended surfaces that form borders of the surrounding layout ( Doeller & Burgess, 2008), as do rats (O'Keefe & Burgess, 1996). Adults encode the object's position relative to a stable landmark object as well, but landmark encoding is demanding of attention and subject to interference ( Doeller & Burgess, 2008), and it depends on neural structures that are distinct from those that encode environmental boundaries ( Doeller, King, & Burgess, 2008; see also Sutton, Joanisse, & Newcombe, 2010). Furthermore, people with Williams Syndrome, a genetic disorder characterized by impaired spatial cognition, show reduced activity in the hippocampus, and they fail to use the geometry of the space in the classic reorientation task when no landmark is present (Lakusta, Dessalegn, & Landau, 2010). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Language has been linked to spatial representation and behavior in humans, but the nature of this effect is debated. Here, we test whether simple verbal expressions improve 4-year-old children's performance in a disoriented search task in a small rectangular room with a single red landmark wall. Disoriented children's landmark-guided search for a hidden object was dramatically enhanced when the experimenter used certain verbal expressions to designate the landmark during the hiding event. Both a spatial expression ("I'm hiding the sticker at the red/white wall") and a non-spatial but task-relevant expression ("The red/white wall can help you get the sticker") enhanced children's search, relative to uncued controls. By contrast, a verbal expression that drew attention to the landmark in a task-irrelevant manner ("Look at this pretty red/white wall") produced no such enhancement. These findings provide further evidence that language changes spatial behavior in children and illuminate one mechanism through which language exerts its effect: by helping children understand the relevance of landmarks for encoding locations.
    Cognition 08/2011; 120(2):186-201. DOI:10.1016/j.cognition.2011.04.004 · 3.63 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the proposal of Tolman (1948) that mammals form maplike representations of familiar environments, cognitive map theory has been at the core of debates on the fundamental mechanisms of animal learning and memory. Traditional formulations of cognitive map theory emphasize relations between landmarks and between landmarks and goal locations as the basis of the map. More recently, several models of spatial coding have taken the boundaries of an environment as the basis of the cognitive map, with landmark relations being processed through alternative, operant learning mechanisms. In this review, the evidence for this proposed dichotomy is analyzed. It is suggested that 2 factors repeatedly confound efforts to compare spatial coding based on landmark arrays, formed by 2 or more landmarks, and that based on the boundaries of an environment. The factors are the perceived stability of the landmark arrays and their placement relative to the larger environment. Although the effects of landmark stability and of placement on spatial navigation have been studied extensively, the implications of this work for debates concerning the role of boundaries in cognitive map formation have not been fully realized. It is argued that when these 2 factors are equated between landmark arrays and bounded environments, current evidence supports a commonality of spatial coding mechanism rather than a dichotomy. The analysis places further doubt on the existence of a dedicated geometric module for reorientation and is consistent with models of navigation containing mapping and operant learning components, both taking as input local views (Sheynikhovich et al., 2009).
    Psychological Bulletin 02/2011; 137(3):484-507. DOI:10.1037/a0022315 · 14.39 Impact Factor
Show more